SPONTANEOUS
INCIDENTS
THE only
spontaneous incidents which can serve as evidence of survival are
apparitions. And among these the penchant for telepathy as an
explanation of so many types of coincidences requires us to select only
phantasms of the dead. As we have already seen, phantasms of the living
and the dying cannot be quoted as evidence, at least as evidence free
from the suspicion of telepathy. We are therefore obliged to select
apparitions which cannot so easily be referred to that process. Some of them at
least, if not all of them,
may be exposed to simpler objections than is telepathy; but I am sure that, if telepathy has
supplanted chance coincidence and subjective casual hallucination as an
explanation for phantasms of the living and of the dying, these latter
explanations will not any more easily apply to certain phantasms of the
dead. We shall suppose here that chance coincidences and subjective
hallucinations have been excluded from the collection with sufficient
care; the remaining experiences are impressive collectively, and, so far
as they go, are suggestively evidential. We resort to experiment for
more conclusive testimony.
In taking up
apparitions, however, as preliminary evidence for survival, I shall
first select from a special type that are perhaps more impressive than
the others and that have more or less corroborative support. I refer to
visions of
the dying. They are
peculiarly free from the ordinary objections to apparitions, though they
may have to contend with other difficulties in the way of proof. They have the
advantage of being identified by the dying person at the outset, and are not
exposed to the suspicion of being ordinary illusions caused by some casual
stimulus. Chance coincidence may account for some of them, but
hallucination and illusion due to sensory stimuli are less applicable to them
than to many other types of
apparition. Besides, they are numerous enough to deserve special
consideration.
The first examples of visions of the
dying are taken from the first number of the "Journal" of the
American Society.
The first of this group was dictated
to me by the two persons who knew the facts and was taken down verbatim.
Both are intelligent and trustworthy witnesses, no more liable
to errors in such matters than all of us. It involved circumstances
which give peculiar value to the incident, as the story itself
will show. I quote the narrative as I took it down.
"Four or five weeks
before my son's death Mrs. S—— was with me—she was my friend and a
psychic—and a message was given me that little Bright Eyes (control)
would
be with
my son who was then ill with cancer. The night before his death he complained that there was a little girl about his
bed and asked who it was. This was at Muskoka, 160 miles north of Toronto. He had not
known what Mrs. S—— had told me, just before his death, about five
minutes, he roused, called his nurse for
a drink of water, and said clearly: 'I think they are taking me.'
Afterward seeing
the possible significance of this I wrote to Miss Aand asked her to see
Mrs. S—— and try to find why the word 'they' was used, underscoring it
in the letter, as I always supposed the boy's father would be with him
at death. Miss Awent went to see Mrs. S——, and did not mention the
letter. When I saw Mrs. S—— more than a
week later we were having a sitting and Guthrie, my son, came and told me how he died. He said he was lying
on the bed and felt he was being lifted out of his body and at that
point all pain left. His first impulse was to get back into his body,
but he was being drawn away. He was taken up into a
cloud
and he seemed to be a part of it. His feeling was that he was being
taken by
invisible hands into rarified air that was so delightful. He spoke of
his freedom
from pain and said that he saw his father beyond."
The
intimate friendship of Mrs. S—— with Mrs. G——, the mother of the boy,
makes it possible to suppose that hints or suggestions may have been unconsciously conveyed to the
boy before his death or that something was said at the experiment which
might deprive the incidents of that importance which they superficially
seem to have. The boy's experience of a strange girl at his bedside, and
the allusion to the plural of the pronoun are quite possibly correct accounts
of the facts. A record of the later sitting would be necessary to be assured that
the allusion to the father was not in response to a suggestion.
I quote next a well authenticated
instance on the authority of Dr. Minot J. Savage. He records it in his
"Psychic Facts and Theories." He also told me personally of the facts and gave
me the names and addresses of the persons on whose authority he tells
the incidents. I am not permitted to mention them;
but the story is as follows:
"In a neighboring
city were two little girls, Jennie and Edith, one about eight years of
age, and the other but a little older. They were schoolmates and
intimate friends. In June, 1889, both were taken ill of diphtheria. At
noon on Wednesday, Jennie died. Then the parents of Edith, and her
physician as well, took particular pains to keep from her the fact that
her little playmate was gone. They feared the effect of the knowledge on
her own condition. To prove that they succeeded and that she did not
know, it may be mentioned that on Saturday, June 8, at noon, just before she became
unconscious of all that was passing about her, she selected two of her photographs to be sent to Jennie, and also
told her attendants to bid her good-by.
"She died at
half-past six o'clock on the evening of Saturday, June 8. She had roused
and bidden her friends good-by, and was talking of dying, and seemed to
have no fear. She appeared to see one and another of the friends she
knew were dead. So far, it was like the common cases. But now suddenly,
and with every appearance of surprise, she turned to her father, and
exclaimed, 'Why, papa, I am going to take Jennie with me!' Then she
added, 'Why, papa! Why, papa! You did not tell me that Jennie was here!'
And immediately she reached out her arms as if in welcome, and
said, 'O, Jennie, I'm so glad you are here."'
As
Dr. Savage remarks in connection with the story, it is not so easy to
account for this incident by the ordinary theory of hallucination. We
have to suppose a casual coincidence at
the same time, and while we should have to suppose this for any isolated
case like the present, the multiplication of
cases, with proper credentials, would suggest some other explanation.
I shall turn next to two instances
which are associated with the experiments and records of Mrs. Piper.
Both present the allegation of death-bed apparitions, and give
statements through Mrs. Piper purporting to be communications from the
deceased, showing a coincidence with what was otherwise known or alleged
to have taken place at the crisis of death. The records in these cases are
unusually good, having been made by Dr. Richard Hodgson. I quote his
reports. The first instance is the experience of a man who gives only
initials for his name, but was well known to Dr. Hodgson. It occurred at
a sitting with Mrs. Piper.
"About the end of
March of last year (1888) I made her (Mrs. Piper) a visit— having been
in the habit of doing so, since early in February, about once a
fortnight. She told me that the death of a near relative of mine would
occur in about six weeks, from which I should realize some pecuniary
advantages. I naturally thought of my father, who was in advanced years,
and whose description Mrs. Piper had given me very accurately some week
or two
previously. She had not spoken of him as my father, but merely as a
person nearly connected with me. I
asked her at this sitting whether this person was the one who would die, but she declined to state anything more
clearly to me. My wife, to whom I was then engaged, went to see Mrs.
Piper a few days afterward, and she told her (my wife) that my father would die in a few weeks.
About the middle of
May my father died very suddenly in London
from heart failure, when he was recovering from a very slight attack of
bronchitis, and the very day that his doctor had pronounced him out of
danger. Previous to this Mrs. Piper (as Dr.
Phinuit) had told me that she would endeavor to influence my father about certain
matters connected with his will before he died. Two days after I
received the cable announcing his death my wife and I went to see Mrs.
Piper, and she (Phinuit) spoke of his presence, and his
sudden arrival in the spirit world, and said that he (Dr. Phinuit) had endeavored to persuade
him in these matters while my father was sick. Dr. Phinuit told me the
state of the will, and described the principal executor, and said that
he (the executor) would make a certain disposition in my favor, subject
to the consent of the other two executors when I got to London, England.
Three weeks afterward I arrived in London; found the principal executor to be the man Dr. Phinuit
had described. The will went materially as he (Dr. Phinuit) had stated.
The disposition was made in my favor, and my sister, who was chiefly at
my father's bedside the last three days of his life, told me he had
repeatedly complained of the presence of an old man at the foot of his bed, who annoyed him by discussing his private
affairs."
The
reader will remark that the incident is associated with a prediction,
but that is not the subject under observation at present. The chief
point of interest is, that the prediction
refers to a will affecting private business matters, that the sister
reported a number of visions or apparitions at the man's death-bed, and that after his
death, apparently not known to Mrs. Piper, the statement was made by
Phinuit that he had influenced or tried to persuade the man in reference to
these matters. The coincidence is unmistakable and the cause is
suggested by the very nature of the phenomena and the conditions under
which they occurred. But we need a large mass
of such incidents to give the hypothesis something like scientific
proof.
The next case is a most important
one. It is connected with an experiment by Dr. Hodgson with Mrs. Piper,
and came as an accidental feature of the sitting. The account
is associated in his report with incidents quoted by him in explanation of the
difficulty and confusion accompanying real or alleged
communications from the dead. It will be useful to quote the report on
that point before narrating the incident itself, as the circumstances associated with
the facts are important to the understanding of the case, while they
also suggest a view of the phenomena which may explain the rarity of
them.
"That persons 'just
deceased,"' says Dr. Hodgson, "should be extremely confused and unable
to communicate directly, or even at all, seems perfectly natural after
the shock and wrench of death. Thus in the case of Hart, he was unable to write the
second day after death. In another case a friend of mine, whom I may call D.,
wrote, with what appeared to be much difficulty, his name and the words,
'I am all right now. Adieu,' within two or three days of his death. In
another case, F., a near relative of Madame Elisa, was unable to write
on the morning after his death. On the second day after, when a stranger
was present with me for a sitting, he wrote two or three sentences,
saying, 'I am too weak to articulate clearly,' and not many days later
be wrote fairly well and clearly, and dictated to Madame
Elisa (deceased), as amanuensis, an account of his feelings at finding himself in
his new surroundings."
In
a footnote Dr. Hodgson adds an account of what this Madame Elisa
communicated regarding the man. I quote this in full. Referring to this
F. and Madame Elisa, he says:
"The notice of his
death was in a Boston paper, and I happened to see it on my way to the sitting.
The first writing of the sitting came from Madame Elisa, without my
expecting it. She wrote clearly and strongly, explaining that F. was
there with
her, but unable to speak directly, that she wished to give me an account
of how she
had helped F. to reach her. She said that she had been present at his
death-bed, and had spoken to him, and she repeated
what she had said, an unusual form of expression, and indicated that he had heard and recognized her.
This was confirmed in detail in the only way possible at the time, by a
very intimate friend of Madame Elisa and myself, and also of the nearest
surviving relative of F. I showed my friend the account of the sitting,
and to this friend a day or two later, the relative, who was present at
the deathbed, stated spontaneously that F., when dying, said that he saw
Madame Elisa, who was speaking to him, and he repeated what she
was saying. The expression so repeated, which the relative quoted to my
friend, was that which I had received from Madame Elisa through Mrs.
Piper's trance, when the death-bed incident was of course entirely
unknown to me."
The apparent significance of such a
coincidence is evident, and its value is much enhanced by the cross
reference involved in the work of Dr. Hodgson. The
following incidents are perhaps less evidential, but may be trusted as
actual events.
The next case is a very important
one, because the percipient did not know that his teacher was dead.
Unfortunately the mother took an unreasonable position in regard to
narrating the facts. The state of mind of religious people on such a
matter is incomprehensible, except on the ground that they take a selfish view
of the question of survival after death. This determination not to help
others in such matters only tends to confirm the skeptic's judgment both that
there is no evidence for the belief and that the believers in it have only a
selfish interest in a future life. Unfortunately this is too often true. In the
present instance we have the statement of another witness and though it is not
as complete as we might wish, because she had not
appreciated the value of the incident, the refusal of the mother to testify is a negative confirmation of the facts.
February 4, 1907.
Dr. James H. Hyslop, Dear Doctor:—
"I
am on the track of a very strange circumstance that happened in the
family of a
cousin of mine living in Greeley, Colorado.
"It seems their child was dying and a very short time
before death told his mother that the teacher (public school teacher) was in the room.
The child's mind, so far as they could tell, was clear. The strange part
is that a Very short time before, perhaps an hour or so, the teacher had suddenly died. Her death was
unlooked for
and the child knew nothing of it, and so far as I can learn none of
those with the child knew of teacher's death. Would such a circumstance
properly vouched for be of any value? I find it very hard to persuade
people to relate or tell about such things. This family above mentioned
are worthy people, the mother being for years a teacher in
the Greeley, Colorado,
schools.
Yours truly,
"DR. H. L. COLEMAN."
I
wrote to Dr. Coleman asking him to make an effort to secure
the lady's statement of the facts, for obvious reasons, and the
following is his reply after making the attempt:
March, 15, 1907.
"Dr. James H. Hyslop.
"My Dear Sir:—
"I am sorry to inform you that I have resorted to every
means to obtain from the mother of the child a full account of the
vision, but she absolutely refuses to give me any information. She belongs to the class of people
who regard such things as Psychical Research as unholy and wrong, though in other matters she is a
woman of
education and standing in society. She is strictly orthodox (a
Methodist) and no influence myself or
any of my friends can have on her will in any way change her views. I feel sure
the case was one of great value. A cousin who talked to her about the
matter told me as follows: The day before the little boy died he and his
mother and the nurse were alone together in the room. The child said his
Sunday school teacher was in the room with them, told how she was
dressed, etc. At the time this took place the teacher, who had suddenly
died, was lying in her casket.
The child had not
been informed of her death.
The child talked to
her much as one would talk to himself. The boy was regarded as very
bright and was highly regarded by his Sunday school teacher. The child
was about eight or ten years old. I will take the liberty to send you
part of the letter from one of the cousins who has been trying to help
me find out about the case. Part of the letter is personal, which you will please pardon, as I can send you
nothing of value for the S. P. R., as it all came in too much round about way; I will return the
stamp you sent me. If later I can find out anything more or introduce
you into the case will do so, but can't now.
Yours truly,
"DR. H. L. COLEMAN."
I will try to answer
the question you asked as near as I can; had I been talking to her myself I could have remembered it and wrote
it down, but Annie didn't pay much attention to it.
"The child saw his
teacher the day before he died; he did not know she was dead; he saw her
soon after her death; he described the way she was dressed as she lay in
her coffin. No one said anything to him about it. He talked as if
talking to himself. No one saw child except the mother and nurse. This
child was about eight years old and very bright; and a pet of his
teacher. Now, Harry, I have written about all Annie can tell me and you
will have to content yourself with this. If I get to
see Clara this coming June I will talk to her myself.
Your cousin,
"ELSIE."
The following incident was not dated
in the informant's reply, and, as it was not a new, incident, its interest
has to rest on the authority
of the informant. He was one of the ablest physicians in his city and
himself attached some value to the facts, though not believing in a
spiritistic hypothesis. The
case must stand for what it is worth.
Cordially yours,
FRANK
WHITEHILL H—
BUFFALO,
N. Y., [June, 1908].
"My Dear Mr. Hyslop:—
I have not been
entirely inattentive to your letter of May, though your recent note gave
my purpose a needed jog.
"Mrs. H—— has asked
me to lay the following facts and circumstances before you:—
"Her brother died in
1876, at the age of twenty-one, after an illness whose entire course
extended intermittently over several years. His grandfather had died
when he was a small boy of about five.
"The grandfather's
memory was dear to his mother and her family, but during this brother's
illness, and especially toward the last when he knew he was dying, it
is said that
the grandfather's memory was not especially recalled.
"About seven in the
evening, after he had been sinking and was supposed to be dying, the family
being gathered about him, he opened his eyes and said "Grandfather," and
looked as though he saw some one whom he addressed thus. He lingered through the night and died the next
morning early.
"So, long a time has
elapsed that more detailed incidents are not available, and would
scarcely be reliable, I fancy.
"An aunt of Mrs. H——
died a few years after the death of her sister, Mrs. H— —'s mother. As she was dying she in the same manner
as though recognizing some One dear to her, said 'Sis'—a title she was
accustomed to giving her sister. The bystanders remarked the similarity to the manner and
speech of the long-time dead brother of Mrs. H——.
"So far as these
incidents are of service you are welcome to make use of them without name, unless
necessary for verification of their truthfulness. With kind regards I am,
The following incident came from one of my former students, now a lawyer.
His special interest in the matter was not awakened until he lost his
wife. At my request he
reported the present incident, after narrating it to me personally. The
gentleman who might have corroborated it in writing was reluctant to do
so, though he confirmed it
viva voce
[verbally].
March 3, 1908.
"Dear Professor:—
"I wish to give you
the written account which you asked for of my observation when my wife
died; she was a very spiritual girl and I always imagined in consequence
that she did not have a very strong grip on life and was ready—
psychologically and not voluntarily—to relinquish her hold. She was the
youngest of a large family and was the particular pet of her father when
a girl. Both her parents had been dead about ten years. She was not in
the habit of mentioning her parents particularly, and all her interests
were centered in her home. The last thing she said to me before she died
was that she complained of being sleepy and from then on to the end,
some two hours, she was not very conscious, as far as we could see, of
her surroundings. When she was in the last struggle she called out
'Mama' once or twice, and later 'Papa! Papa! take me up,
they are killing me.'
(I remember this
distinctly.) Shortly afterwards, some ten minutes, she passed away.
"Considering that
she did not frequently speak of her parents, that at and shortly prior to her death she was too weak to
speak to me, but nevertheless called out in a loud voice just as she was
passing away, the incident is interesting as bearing upon the mental
states at such transitional periods.
Yours faithfully,
"HARRISON CLARK,
JR."
The following incidents explain
themselves; one of them is especially interesting because it is
associated with a death vision by the lady herself of the same
personality that had appeared as a warning of the death of others. That is, we have an ordinary
apparition premonitory of the death of others and also of the subject
herself when she died, giving a double interest to the facts and showing
that the two types must have the same explanation.
"MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN,
March 18,
1907.
"Dr. James H. Hyslop.
"Dear Sir:
"My mother used to
say that whenever there was about to occur the death of a friend or relative,
she saw her own mother standing beside her and looking at her. The first time that
I knew of this vision of hers was when I was a girl of about twelve. My
mother's most intimate friend, outside her own family, was dangerously
ill. In the evening mother came from the friend's house and coming into
my room got into bed with me. When I awoke in the morning mother was
sitting on the edge of the bed in a brown study. I spoke to her and she
roused herself and said: 'I fear Mrs. F—— is no more.' I asked
her why she said that and she replied: 'Mother appeared to me just now.' Then she explained her
belief that
grandmother always appeared to her before the death of anyone she
loved, and added: 'As I opened my eyes this morning, lying there beside
you, I saw mother; standing looking over the foot-board
of the bed at me, very intently.'
"In less than an
hour my aunt came up from Mrs. F.'s to say that she had passed away early in the
morning.
"I do not distinctly
recall any other instance of this hallucination of hers until the morning before
her own death, about fifteen years later. She had had an attack of pneumonia, but the doctor had said that she was
better and I was feeling much easier about her. I was taking care of her
alone that night. About four in the morning, when I went up to the bed
to give her medicine or stimulant—I have forgotten which—she aroused
from a light slumber, looked up, at me very keenly and said: 'Mother has just been with me.' The significance of it flashed
over me at
once and I could hardly control myself enough to give her the medicine I
had in my hand. I went into the other room at once to call father to go
for the doctor. Before he could arrive she had sunk into a stupor, and
passed away in a few hours. Those were the last conscious words, or
rather I should say intelligible words that she ever spoke to me. They
were spoken in as clear and distinct a voice as she ever used.
"She died of heart
failure, a reaction from pneumonia. My grandmother died a month before I
was born.
"Another incident
that I have only by hearsay was this: My mother told me that her father, on his
death-bed, and when they thought he was just about gone, suddenly raised
a little from his pillow, opened his eyes wide and called out in a
glad, clear tone: 'Why, Dada!' This was the name
of his wife's brother with whom, as a young man, he had been very intimate, and who had
been dead for many years."
Instances of the same kind are much
more numerous than those we have quoted, though they are not recorded
as they should have been. One good instance, which happened in the
family of Mr. James G. Blaine, mentioned in the preceding chapter, should have
been recorded in detail. But the witnesses of it seem not to have
appreciated its scientific interest. Probably the majority of similar incidents
escape all but the immediate witnesses and generally they are regarded as
too personal for scientific notice. They are not quoted here as of
themselves satisfactory scientific proof of survival, though in sufficient
numbers and properly observed they might be adequate even to that purpose.
They at least suggest what other methods might establish or corroborate, and
are so free from objections obtrusive in other phenomena that they deserve a
first place among spontaneous incidents in favor of survival.
I next take up another type of
apparition which requires specially good credentials to escape the
suspicion of casual hallucination. But, as chance has been excluded from the
explanation even of phantasms of the living, we may illustrate a type
from whose interpretation telepathy is also excluded, though,
apparently at least, they are not so common as phantasms of the living, including
those of dying persons.
Phantasms of the dead are not easily
classified as examples of telepathy. We cannot specify the agent without
either unwarrantably extending the telepathy or making the deceased
person the agent. The latter assumes that the facts are evidence of survival;
and we may take such instances as spontaneous evidence for survival,
though we may not regard this evidence as conclusive unless the facts become
numerous enough and well enough established to
be on the same level as experimental phenomena.
The first report of the English
Committee on Haunted Houses mentions a number of good instances. One of
them involves experiences by two persons.*
"In the early
spring of 1852, Mr. X. Z. went to reside in a large old house near C——.
Mr. X. Z. only occupied part of the house, the remainder being inhabited
by a friend of his own, Mr. G——, and some pupils. Mr. G—— had occupied
the house about a year before Mr. X. Z.'s arrival; and two servants had,
in that interval, given him warning, on account of strange noises which
they had heard. The house, which is
a large one, was let at an extremely low rent.
"On the night of
the 22nd of September, 1852, at about 1 A.M. Mr. X. Z. went up to his bedroom. The house was in complete darkness, and
he took no candle with him; but on opening a door which led into the
passage where his room was situated, he found the whole passage filled
with light. The light was white like daylight, or electric light, and
brighter than moonlight. At first Mr. X. Z. was dazzled by the light,
but when his eyes became used to it he saw, standing at the end of the
passage, about thirty-five feet from him, an old man in a figured
dressing-gown. The face of this old man, which Mr. X. Z. saw quite
clearly, was most hideous; so evil was it that both expression and
features were firmly imprinted on his memory. As Mr. X. Z. was still
looking, figure and light both vanished, and left him in pitch darkness. Mr. X. Z. did
not, at that time, believe in ghosts, and his first thought was (he had lately read Brewster's 'Natural
Magic,' and
had been much impressed with the striking cases of spectral illusion
recorded in
that work) that he was the subject of a hallucination. He did not feel at all frightened, but resolved to, take a
dose of physic in the morning. The next day, however, remembering the
tales told by the two servants who had left, be made inquiries in the
village as to the past history of the house. At
first he could find out nothing, but finally an old lawyer told him
that he had
heard that the grandfather of the present owner of the house had
strangled his wife and then cut his own throat, on the very spot where
Mr. X. Z. had seen the figure. The lawyer was unable to give the exact
date of this occurrence, but Mr. X. Z. consulted the parish register,
and found the two deaths recorded as having
taken place on the 22nd September, 179—
(the precise year he could not now (1882)
remember). The lawyer added he had heard that the old man was in the
habit of walking about the house in a figured dressing-gown, and had the
reputation of being half an imbecile.
"On the 22nd September, 1853, a friend of Mr. G——'s arrived to make a short stay. He
came down to breakfast the following morning, looking very pale, and
announced his intention of terminating his visit immediately. Mr. G——
rather angrily insisted on knowing the reason of his sudden departure;
and the young man, when pressed, reluctantly explained that he had been
kept awake all night by the sound of cryings and groanings, blasphemous
oaths, and cries of despair. The door of his bedroom opened on to the
spot where the murderer had committed suicide; and it was in the bedroom
which he had occupied that the murder had been committed. In 1856, Mr.
X. Z. and his friend had occasion to call on their landlord, who lived
in London.
On being shown into the room, Mr. X. Z. at once recognized a picture
above the mantel-piece as being that of the figure which he had seen.
The portrait, however, had been taken when the man was younger, and the
expression was not so hideous. He called Mr. G——'s attention to the
painting, saying: 'That is the man whom I saw!
"The landlord, on
being asked whom the portrait represented, replied that it was the
portrait of his grandfather, adding that he had been no credit to the
family."
The
incident lacks nothing in dramatic interest, but is old, though well
authenticated. It would take many such to enforce a conclusion; and only the certification of a large number
of more recent cases, such as those which "Phantasms of the Living"
presents, could justify the use of such an incident for
illustration. But there are similar instances.
In a paper by Mrs. Sidgwick on
"Phantasms of the Dead"* an incident is recorded, which will have to be
abbreviated. Its interest lies in the unconscious testimony of a child
to an experience whose meaning he did not know.
A man died in 1875,
leaving a widow and six children. The three eldest children were
admitted to an orphanage. Three years afterwards the widow died, and
then the three remaining children were admitted to the orphanage. Some
visitors came one day; and, as the place was full, the warden took a bed
in the little ones' dormitory. In the night he suddenly awoke and saw a
soft light in the room. He saw that it was not the gas light from the
hall, and, turning round, he saw a wonderful vision. Over the second bed
from his, and on the same side of the room, there was floating a small
cloud of light, forming a halo of the brightness of the moon on an
ordinary moonlight night. In this bed slept the youngest of the six
children. The warden took the trouble to note that he was not dreaming,
but went to sleep again. In the morning, while dressing, this youngest
child looked
at the warden with an extraordinary expression, and said:
"Oh, Mr. Jupp, my
mother came to me last night. Did you see her?" The warden did not
answer the child, though astonished at the statement, and nothing more
was said about it.
This
is practically a case of shared experience, as two persons had an
experience at approximately the same time. The following is from the same list by Mrs.
Sidgwick. It was received from Mrs. Windridge, whose address was given
in the account.
"November 9, 1882.
"About the year
1869, I was much interested in a poor woman who was dying in my
neighborhood. I used to visit her frequently, until my friends prevented
me from going any more, as the excitement rendered me ill. Eventually,
when she died, they concealed the fact from me for some
days.
"I was taking my
little boy, three years old, up to bed one evening. It was dusk; and, when half-way
up the first flight of stairs, I distinctly felt a pressure and a
rustling of a dress at my side, as if a woman had brushed past me. There
was no one
there. On the second flight the pressure was repeated, but more
unmistakably. The occurrence made
me so nervous that, having put the boy to bed, I decided to remain with
him until my husband came in. I accordingly lay down on the bed, facing
him.
"Suddenly the boy
started up. 'Oh, mother, there is a lady standing behind you!' At the same moment I
felt a pressure which I knew to be that of my friend. I dared not look
round.
"When my husband
returned, I heard for the first time that my friend had died three days
before."
Again the experience was shared, and
bears the marks of purpose. The next has a human interest and is from
the same collection. It was recorded by the Rev. C.
C. Wambey.
"During my residence in B. C., as curate in charge, it was my custom in
the summer
evenings to walk over the neighboring downs.
"On the evening of
Sunday, August 20, 1874, I was strolling on the downs skirting Maricombe
Hill, composing a congratulatory letter, which I proposed to write and post to
my very dear friend W., so that he might have it on his birthday, the
twenty-second, when I bhard a voice saying, 'What, write to a dead man;
write to a
dead man!' I turned sharply round, fully expecting to see some one close
behind me. There was no one. Treating the matter as an illusion, I went
on with my composition. A second time I heard the same voice, saying,
more loudly than before, 'What, write to a dead man; write to a
dead man!'
Again I turned round. I was alone, at least bodily. I now fully
understood the meaning of that voice; it was no illusion.
"Notwithstanding
this, I sent the proposed letter, and in reply received from Mrs. W. the
sad, but to me not unexpected, intelligence that her husband was dead."
Here is another brief instance from
the same collection; it was the only experience of Mrs. Haly, who
reported it.
"On waking in broad
daylight, I saw, like a shadowed reflection, a 'Very long coffin stretching
quite across the ceiling of my room, and as I lay gazing at it, and
wondering at
its length and whose death it could foreshadow, my eyes fell on a
shadowy figure of an absent nephew, with his back towards me, searching,
as it were, in my book-shelf. That morning's post brought the news of
his death in Australia. He was six foot two or
three inches in
height, and a book, taken from that very bookcase,
had been my last present to him on his leaving England.
The
next instance from the same list, a long one, is also reported by a
clergyman. The writer was the Rev. Gerrard Lewis, of St. Paul's Vicarage, Margate. The account was given in a
letter to Mr. Podmore. The story had been published in "Temple Bar."
"I have nothing to
add to my 'true ghost story' in 'Temple Bar.' As to dates, be died on
Thursday,
September 19, 1866. I saw his appearance on Sunday, September 22, and
officiated at his funeral on Wednesday, September 25.
"My wife's mother
had in her service a coachman named P., with one son, James Henry P.,
who had been brought up by friends at a distance, and was apprenticed to
a trade in London. His father had only twice casually mentioned him to me,
and he had almost entirely slipped out of my mind, for, with a large
seaside parish on my hands, of which I was curate, my time and attention
were fully taken up with matters nearer home. I mention this, lest in
the course of the following story my readers should chance to think that
a deep impression, previously made on my own mind, had predisposed me to
see what I saw, and afterwards to regard it in a supernatural light. I
cannot, therefore, too emphatically repeat that I knew next to
nothing about James Henry P., my friend's son; that I had never seen him; and
seldom, if ever, thought of him at all.
"It was a hot and
bright afternoon in summer, and, as if it were only yesterday, I
remember perfectly well walking down the broad bright street in the
broad bright afternoon. I had to pass the house of P. I remarked indeed
that all his window blinds were drawn carefully down, as if to screen
his furniture, of which his wife was
inordinately proud, from the despoiling blaze of the afternoon sun. I
smiled
inwardly at the thought. I then left the road, stepped up on the side
pavement, and looked over the area rails into the front
court below. A young man, dressed in dark clothes, and without a hat, and apparently about twenty
years of age, was standing at the door beneath the front steps. On the
instant, from his likeness to my
friend P., I seemed to recognize his son. We both stood and looked
very hard at
each other. Suddenly, however, he advanced to that part of the area
which was
immediately below where I was standing', fixed on me a wide, dilated,
winkless sort of stare, and halted. The desire to
speak was evidently legible on his face, though nothing audible escaped from his lips. But
his eyes spoke; every feature in his countenance spoke, spoke, as it
were, a silent language, in which reproach and pain seemed equally
intermingled. At first I was startled; then I began to feel angry.
'Why,' I said to myself, 'does he look at me in that manner?' At last,
annoyance prevailing over surprise, I turned away with the half-muttered
thought: 'He certainly knows me by sight as a
friend of his father, and yet has not the civility to salute me. I will call on the first
opportunity and ask his reason for such behavior.' I then pursued my way
and thought no more of what had just occurred.
"On Wednesday it
was my turn to officiate at the local cemetery. On my asking who was to be
buried, I was told that it was a young man from my quarter of the town,
who had died of consumption. I cannot give the reason, but immediately I
felt startled and ill at ease. It was not that I had the least suspicion
that anything extraordinary was about to happen. I had quite forgotten
young P. The feeling which I think was uppermost in my mind was
annoyance at the fact that anyone should have died of
such a slow disease in my parish, but without my knowledge. I asked without delay for the registrar's certificate. My
eyes fell on the words, 'James Henry P., aged twenty-one years! I could scarcely believe my own
senses.
"I lost but little
time before calling on P. and his wife. I found the latter at home, and
what she had to say only made me more uncomfortable still. James Henry
P. bore such a close resemblance to his father that all who saw him
remarked on the striking likeness. In addition to this, during the last
three months of his life, which
he spent under his father's roof, he had often wondered that I did
not come to
see him. His longing for an interview with me had been most intense;
and every time he saw me pass the house without
going in he had both felt and expressed a keen disappointment. In fact,
he died terribly in earnest, wishing in vain to the last that I would come. That thought pierced
me through and through. I had not gone to him, but he had come to me. And yet I would
have gone, if I had but known. I blame the doctor for not telling me; I
blame the parents for not sending for me; and with that awful look he
gave me in my remembrance, I blame
myself, though I cannot tell why.
"James Henry P. had
died on the Thursday before the Sunday on which I had seen him. He had died, too, in the front room, on a
level with the area, into which its window opened. He had also lain
there till the Wednesday following, awaiting burial. His corpse then was lying in that very room on
that very Sunday, and at the very moment, too, when I had seen his
living likeness, as it were, in the area outside. Nobody, I found, had passed through the area
that day; the door there had been locked and unused all the Sunday. The very milkman, the only person
who called,
had come by the front steps to the house; and P. and his wife were the
only inmates
at the time."
Another
long case follows this, and tells of the appearance of a young man, to say that he did not do what
he was accused of. Inquiry showed that
he had been accused of committing
suicide. Later it was found that the accusation was not true. Another
represents two persons seeing a phantasm, of the
same person whose relation to the place was wholly unknown to them,
though afterwards verified.
Mr. Myers quotes from the "Census of
Hallucinations," Volume X of the English "Proceedings," a case of
which that report says: "Unless we accept the hypothesis of chance coincidence,
the evidence for the agency of the dead is certainly strong, because
any other explanation compatible with the veracity of the
narrators requires a very complicated and improbable hypothesis." The following is the narrative [p. 3831:
"Rio DE JANEIRO,
March 12, 1892.
[After relating his
first meeting, in June, 1886, with "Deolinda," a child whom he had found
in great poverty and had taken charge of, and her death from consumption shortly
afterwards, Senor Cabral continues:—]
"Some months passed,
and my family (which now included my wife's other sister, Amelia) went
to stay at a plantation belonging to friends. I escorted them thither,
and returned to attend to my obligations in the city. In order not to be
alone, I accepted the invitation of my friend, Barboza de Andrade, and
went to live
with him in S. Christovam. One!month afterwards, a sister of Barboza's,
who was ill, came into his house. She grew daily worse,
and after the lapse of a few months had sunk so low that we had to sit up with her at
night.
"One
night when I had taken my turn at nursing, I felt sleepy, and
went to lie down. Two sisters, Donnas Anna Ignez Dias Fortes and
Feliciana. Dias (now deceased), took my place. I had made their
acquaintance but a few days before. After stretching myself on the bed,
I was filled with a feeling of unbounded joy. I was happy, and could not
imagine what was the cause of my happiness. I had a sensation as if some
one were holding my head and placing something round it.
"Astonished at my
experience, I called to the ladies who were watching in the next room, and Donna
Feliciana, though from the place where she was seated she could not see
me, answered me back, 'I see at your bedside a spirit child clothed in
white. She places on your head a crown of roses. She says her name is
Deolinda, and she comes to thank you for the kindness and charity with
which you behaved to her.' I was amazed at such a declaration, for that
very day was the anniversary of
Deolinda's death, and neither I nor any other person in the house had recollected this. Besides, I had never spoken
on the subject.
"ULYSSES CABRAL."
The two ladies write that they knew
nothing of the story of Deolinda and confirm the narrative as told. The
incident is especially interesting as involving a tactual phantasm by
Senor Cabral himself, veridical in nature, and probably affected by the
condition of the dying woman, as it is possible that phantasms of the kind
require some energy supplied by the living who are in a state to
generate it, a state on the borderland of death.
The next case is remarkably
interesting, as it is not only a phantasm of the dead, but is
accompanied by the account of a phantasm of another person definitely
related to the decedent and appearing to other persons as a premonition of her death, and is
also a vision of the dying person, so that it combines three characteristics of
great interest. It also is quoted by Mr. Myers from the "Census of
Hallucinations." Mrs. B. is the writer of the narrative.
April, 1892.
At Fiesole, on March
11, 1869, I was giving my little children their dinner at half-past one
o'clock. It was a fine hot day. As I was in the act of serving macaroni
and milk from a high tureen, so that I had to stand to reach it, and
give my attention to what I was doing, on raising my head (as much from
fatigue as for any purpose), the
wall opposite me seemed to open, and I saw my mother lying dead on her
bed in her little house at ——. Some flowers were at her side and on
her breast:
she looked calm, but unmistakably dead, and the coffin was there.
"It was so real that I could scarcely believe that the wall was really
brick and
mortar, and not a transparent window—in fact, it was a wall dividing the
hotel in which we were living from the Carabinieri. "I was in very weak
health—suffering intensely with neuralgia—having gone through 'a bad
confinement, brought on by traveling, the baby was almost still born, on
January 31.
"Owing to a family
quarrel, I had left England without telling my people where I was going; but I
was so fond of my mother that, when in Paris, I made an excuse to write to an old
servant, who lived with my mother, to ask her for a toy which we had
left with her,—the object being to get news of my mother. Reply came
that for years she had not been so well and strong; thus I had no reason
for imagining her to be dead.
"I was so distressed
at the vision, that I wrote to her (my mother) to give her my address,
and entreat her to let me know how she was. By return of post came the
statement that she had died on March 5, and was buried on the eleventh.
At the hour I saw her, she was removed from her home to Kensal Green
Cemetery. She had wished to see me so much that letters had been sent to
a great many continental cities, hoping I might be found; but I never
got a letter from my sister till long after I
had received the news of my mother's death.
"When I was married,
my mother made me promise, as I was leaving home, to be sure to let her
know in any way God permitted if I died, and she would try to find some
way of communicating to me the fact of her death—supposing that
circumstances prevented the usual methods of writing or telegraphing. I
considered the vision a fulfilment of this promise, for my mind was
engrossed with my own grief and pain—the loss of baby, and my neuralgia,
and the anxieties of starting a new life.
"My youngest sister,
since dead, was called to my mother and left Devonshire, where she was
staying with friends, to come home. When she arrived at home, she
entered the drawing-room, but rushed out terrified, exclaiming that she
had seen godmamma, who was seated by the fire in my mother's chair.
Godmamma had been dead since 1852. She had been my mother's
governess—almost fostermother; had lived with her during her married
life, been godmother to her eldest girl, and when my father died had
accepted the duty of taking his place as far as possible in the family,
to shield her from trouble and protect her—a duty which she fulfilled
nobly.
"My other sister
went into the drawing-room to see what had scared K——, and saw the
figure of godmamma, just as K—— had. Later in the day, the same figure
stood by, then sat on the edge of my mother's bed, and was seen by both my sisters and the old servant, looking just as she
had when alive, except that she wore a gray dress, and, as far as we could remember, she
had always worn black. My mother saw her, for she turned towards her and said 'Mary'—her name."
This is also an instance of what the
English investigators call a it compact case," which means an instance
in which the parties concerned had made a promise between them to
return. George Pelham was a case of the kind and Mr. Myers enumerates
twelve such cases. But I turn now to some American instances of the
kind; I shall only summarize the first case.
A man died on
April 12,1905. On the twentieth of May following, the sister-in-law was
washing the dishes in the kitchen, and her sister was playing the piano,
when the sister in the kitchen saw an apparition of her brother-in-law
lying in bed straight in front of her just where she had seen him for
the last month of his life. The music played on the piano was the same that the sister had played for
him during his last illness.
The next case I
must also abbreviate, as it is very long. It is reported by Dr. Heysinger, who took it from the
autobiography of Captain Little, of the merchant service out of Baltimore.
The book was entitled, "Life on the Ocean; or, Twenty Years at Sea."
It was a clear
night. All had turned in. About midnight the captain was called by the
sailor on the watch, who said that there was on deck a woman dressed in black, who was calling for
him. Believing the sailor to be half drunk, as was generally the case at
that period, the captain drove him away; but the sailor persisted in his
statement and pointed out the place where he had seen and talked with
the woman. Diligent search revealed nothing and they all turned in
again. About two hours later another sailor, who was a perfectly sober
man, called the captain again with the same story of a woman calling for
the captain. The crew corroborated his testimony. Search was made again
but without effect. The sailors, being somewhat superstitious, wanted to
be discharged, but the captain would not listen to it. They felt that the
apparition was a premonition that the ship was going down. On the captain's
stubborn refusal they went to work, and the ship stood out to sea. On
the second day they encountered a terrific storm and all were fearful of the
consequences. At midnight, precisely, the ghostly visitor appeared again, but neither Captain C—— nor the narrator
of the story saw it. The vessel reached Martinique safely and went thence to
Guadaloupe, where yellow fever seized some of the crew; during the
raging of this malady the same visitor was seen again by the crew. On
reaching home after the return voyage, Captain C—— received a letter
saying that his wife was dead.
On comparing the time of her demise
with that of the first appearance of the lady in black, while the ship Jay
in Annapolis Roads, he found that the time exactly corresponded.
But for the subsequent apparitions
this case would be classified with phantasms of the living or of those
just dying. The next instance is a "compact case" and was reported to me
by the Rev. A. B. Weymouth, a missionary in the Hawaiian Islands.
"LAHAINA, HAWAIIAN ISLANDS, October 24, 1910.
Dear Dr. Hyslop:
"When I was living
in Los Angeles, California, I became acquainted with Mrs. Jennie D—— who
seemed to be a congenial soul. In the autumn of 1888, Mrs. D—— and I
made a verbal agreement that the one who should first enter the
spiritual world should return (d.v.) and appear to the other. In the
spring of 1898, the lady became
seriously ill and after a few months of suffering passed away. As no tidings came from the deceased, I supposed that
some unexpected obstacle prevented her return. But at last the long
silence was broken. On Saturday evening, October 22, 1910, I retired to rest soon after nine o'clock. After
refreshing sleep I awoke with the impression that something unusual was
about to happen. Then I distinctly heard a voice saying: 'Jennie D. is
coming.' A few moments later,
something like a bright cloud appeared in my bedroom.
In the midst of the
cloud I recognized the form of my long lost friend. While hovering in
the air she sang two verses sweetly. Then other spirit forms appeared
(the faces
not recognized) and joined in the refrain.
I had never heard
the words or the music before; and I regret that I cannot recall the words.
They were very beautiful and so was the melody.
When the music
ceased, the bright cloud and the celestial visitors disappeared and my
room was dark again. I arose immediately, lighted a lamp, looked at my
watch and made a record of the incident. The time of the vision was
12.30 on Sunday morning.
Sincerely yours,
"A. B.WEYMOUTH."
Mr. Albert J. Edmunds, librarian of
the Pennsylvania Historical Society, reports a case in fuller detail
than that given in the report published by the English Society, and
again by Mr. Myers in his great work, "Human Personality and its
Survival of Bodily Death." We shall have to abbreviate it, though it is published in detail
in the "Journal," of the American Society for Psychic Research (Volume VI, PP. 439-448). The man who saw the
apparition was well known to Mr. Myers, who took down the statement from
this man himself.
"In 1880 I succeeded
a Mr. Q. as librarian of the X Library. I had never seen Mr. Q. nor any
photograph nor likeness of him, when the following incidents occurred. I
may, of course, have heard the library assistants describe his appearance, though I have no recollection of this.
I was sitting alone in the library one evening late in March, 1884,
finishing some work after hours, when it suddenly occurred to me that I
should miss the last train to H., where I was then living, if I did not
make haste. It was then 10:55, and the last train left X. at 11:05. I gathered
up some books in one hand, took the lamp in the other, and prepared to
leave the librarian's room, which communicated by a passage with the
main room of the library. As my lamp illuminated
this passage, I saw apparently at the further end of it a man's face. I
instantly thought a thief had got into the library. This was by no means
impossible, and the probability of it had occurred to me before. I turned back into my room, put down the
books and took a revolver from the safe, and, holding the lamp cautiously behind me, I made my way
along the
passage which had a corner behind which I thought my thief might be
lying in
wait—into the main room. Here I saw no one, but the room was large and
encumbered with bookcases. I called out loudly several times to the
intruder to show himself, more with the hope of attracting a passing
policeman than of drawing the intruder. Then I saw a face looking round one
of the bookcases. I say looking
round, but it had an odd appearance as if the
body were
in the bookcase, as the face came so closely to the edge and I could see
no body. The face was pallid and
hairless, and the orbits of the eyes were very deep. I advanced towards
it, and as I
did so I saw an old man with high shoulders seem to rotate, and with a
shuffling
gait walk rather quickly from the bookcase to a small lavatory, which
opened from the library and had no other access. I heard no noise. I
followed the man at once into the lavatory; and to my extreme surprise
found no one there. I examined the window (about twelve by fourteen
inches), and found it closed and fastened. I opened it and looked out.
It opened into a well, the bottom of which, ten feet below, was a
sky-light, and the top open to the sky some twenty feet above. It was in
the middle of the building and no one could have dropped into it without smashing the
glass nor climbed out of it without a ladder, but no one was there. Nor had there
been anything like time for a man to get out of the window, as I
followed the intruder instantly. Completely mystified, I even looked
into the
little cupboard under the fixed basin. There was nowhere hiding for a
child, and I
confess I began to experience for the first time what novelists describe
as an 'eerie' feeling.
"I left the library,
and found I had missed my train. Next morning I mentioned what I had seen to
a local clergyman who, on hearing my description, said, 'Why, that's old Q!' Soon
after I saw a photograph (from a drawing) of Q., and the resemblance was certainly striking. Q. had lost all his
hair, eyebrows and all, from (I believe) a gunpowder accident. His walk
was a peculiar, rapid, high-shouldered shuffle.
"Later inquiry proved he had died at about the time of year at which I
saw the figure."
Two assistants in
the library some time later saw a spectral light in the room in which
Mr. Q.
used
to sit late at night writing articles.
This was in 1884. About 4 P.M., April 1, 1885, Mr. J., one of the persons who had seen the spectral light, was sitting at
the head of a long table, and asked Mr. Edmunds, the sponsor for this story,
to stay a minute, as something was the matter with the table. The upshot of
the matter was, that Mr. Edmunds, after proving that other conjectures
were not correct, shouted out the suspicion that it had something to do
with "old Q." What they had heard was a "half bell-like vibration,
which sounded something like a tuning fork when struck and held to the
ear." just as Mr. Edmunds suggested that it had something to do with "old Q.," Mr.
R., who had seen the illuminated room, came in. "He was the only member
of the staff that had worked under Q." The three men put their fingers
lightly on the table, and, as soon as Mr. R. touched the table, the
sound came ringing out of his sleeve. Two of the party rushed to R. and
looked into his sleeve, but found nothing there. Recalling that such phenomena
sometimes occurred on the anniversaries of deaths they decided to find out when
Mr. Q. had died. A messenger was dispatched to some one who knew and he
returned with the information that Mr. Q. had died on the first of
April, 1880, between four and five o'clock in the afternoon.
Mr. Edmunds
then asked R. whether, when Q. was alive, he was accustomed to hear in
this library any sound that at all resembled the ringing; he replied
that he was. Upon that spot on the table whence the sound appeared to
proceed there used to stand an old cracked gong, which when Q. wanted
one of his boys, he used to strike; it sounded like the vibration which
the three men had heard. Thus, on the fifth anniversary, to the very
hour, of the old man's death, a phantasmal bell reminded them of his
presence.
A number of
experiments were then held, and the alleged Q. was interrogated with
some success. But the important fact is, that a series of shared experiences and of real or
alleged messages came, strengthening the significance of the first apparition;
it is only the phantasmal phenomena that are important in this
connection.
The
following incident has a romantic and perhaps pathetic interest.
It was in the collection of Dr.
Hodgson, which came to me after his death; and, as I knew the person who
had reported it, I took the pains to have it fully confirmed. It was
written out by the lady herself and reported to Dr. Hodgson in 1904. Mrs. Howell
did not date her account.
"In the year 1865 I
had a lover by the name of John A. Broadhead. Owing to several
circumstances I was obliged to give him up, although I was deeply
attached to him. When he found that he could not marry me, he left the
town of Mount Morris, where I lived, but before he left he said to me:
'Mary, I think this separation will kill me, but if I die and a spirit can
come back to earth, I will come to you.'
"I replied, 'Oh, no,
don't; for that would frighten me dreadfully! 'No, it would not,' he
answered, 'for I should come so calmly that you would not be at all
afraid.'
"In 1868 I married
George R. Howell, a Presbyterian minister who knew all about my
affection for John Broadhead. In April, 1871, I was visiting my old home with my husband and baby boy. About one
o'clock one Sunday afternoon (I think it was April 12) I sat in the parlor of my father's
house, my baby in my arms, on the long old fashioned sofa on which I had
so often sat with my old lover. My husband
sat across the room with his back to me, reading. The sofa was unusually
long and I sat at the end of it near a door opening into the hall.
"Suddenly I felt a
pressure against my knee and limb as though some one had come very close
to me, and I looked up expecting to see one of my brothers, but to my great
surprise saw my old lover, John Broadhead, standing there beside me. I felt greatly distressed, for he lived in a
distant city. I had not seen him since 1865, and I thought it an
unwarrantable intrusion that he should enter my father's house thus
unannounced. It never occurred to me that he was not alive. I noticed
every detail of his dress and can even now distinctly remember the black
and white necktie which he wore. Before I had a chance to speak he
raised his right hand and said, speaking very slowly and gently: 'Be
very calm, Mary. I am what they call dead. I died in the West three
weeks ago to-day.' Then, lifting his left hand, he pointed to
a newspaper which lay at the other end of the sofa about three feet away from me
and said: 'You will find my death in that paper.' Then without moving a
muscle he vanished while I gazed at him.
"I was not at all
afraid, but felt completely overcome by the shock of suddenly learning
that he was dead, for, much as I loved my husband, I had never gotten
over my old
feeling for John Broadhead; and if it had not been for the baby in my arms I think
I would have fainted away. As it was, I could not speak or call my
husband, but I managed to hitch along the sofa till I could reach the
paper to which he had pointed. This turned out to be a copy of the New
York 'Times' that had never been
taken out of the wrapper in which it had come through the mails. I
tore it open
and there, among the death notices, I found this paragraph:
Died in Burlington, Iowa,
March 22, 1871, John A. Broadhead of this city in the thirty-fourth year
of his age.'
"MARY SEYMOUR HOWELL."
It is certain that these phantasms of
the dead cannot be explained by telepathy between living persons, except
by proving an extension of
thought-transference that has never been justified by any facts
whatever. It is an interesting
fact that out of the twelve cases of compact before death, three fulfilled their pledge before
they died! They were very ill, near death, when they appeared to the
other party to the promise, but recovered health, some of them still living when the
facts were reported. This circumstance strongly supports the application
of telepathy; and the scientific men who had to consider them were
entirely right to pause before accepting a spiritistic interpretation of
phantasms of the dying. The facts made it necessary, if phantasms of any
kind were to be regarded as testimony of survival, that they should be
of the type to which no proved telepathy could apply. The present
instances seem to be illustrations of the desired kind. If telepathy
applies to them at all, it will be that form of it which is not an
alternative theory to belief in spirits, but the name of a process of communication which will apply alike to the agency of the dead and of the
living. It is probable that the same process lies at the basis of all
phantasms and that the
differences lie only in the agents. But the main point here is that the
phantasms of the dead show no traces of being initiated or instigated by the living. I have chosen for the most part those which
have a teleological aspect;
and teleology is not suggested by any known telepathy.
Such phenomena,
however, can never constitute the scientific proof for survival that the
experimental investigator will require. It is conceivable that they
might be accumulated until they did establish the probabilities so
overwhelmingly that experiment would not seem imperative. But always
experimental proof is more satisfactory than spontaneous phenomena. The
spontaneous phenomena suggest the problem and go far toward making the
conclusion reasonable, though we may feel some hesitation in each case
about accepting their evidential character. They often contain features
that associate them
psychologically with the phenomena obtained through mediumistic sources.
We cannot dwell on this circumstance. We only remark it as an additional
characteristic that tends to support the genuineness and significance of
the facts.
|