Index

 

 

 

Contact with The Other World by James H. Hyslop 1919

 

SPONTANEOUS INCIDENTS

 THE only spontaneous incidents which can serve as evidence of survival are apparitions. And among these the penchant for telepathy as an explanation of so many types of coincidences requires us to select only phantasms of the dead. As we have already seen, phantasms of the living and the dying cannot be quoted as evidence, at least as evidence free from the suspicion of telepathy. We are therefore obliged to select apparitions which cannot so easily be referred to that process. Some of them at least, if not all of them, may be exposed to simpler objections than is telepathy; but I am sure that, if telepathy has supplanted chance coincidence and subjective casual hallucination as an explanation for phantasms of the living and of the dying, these latter explanations will not any more easily apply to certain phantasms of the dead. We shall suppose here that chance coincidences and subjective hallucinations have been excluded from the collection with sufficient care; the remaining experiences are impressive collectively, and, so far as they go, are suggestively evidential. We resort to experiment for more conclusive testimony.

 In taking up apparitions, however, as preliminary evidence for survival, I shall first select from a special type that are perhaps more impressive than the others and that have more or less corroborative support. I refer to visions of the dying. They are peculiarly free from the ordinary objections to apparitions, though they may have to contend with other difficulties in the way of proof. They have the advantage of being identified by the dying person at the outset, and are not exposed to the suspicion of being ordinary illusions caused by some casual stimulus. Chance coincidence may account for some of them, but hallucination and illusion due to sensory stimuli are less applicable to them than to many other types of apparition. Besides, they are numerous enough to deserve special consideration.

The first examples of visions of the dying are taken from the first number of the "Journal" of the American Society.

The first of this group was dictated to me by the two persons who knew the facts and was taken down verbatim. Both are intelligent and trustworthy witnesses, no more liable to errors in such matters than all of us. It involved circumstances which give peculiar value to the incident, as the story itself will show. I quote the narrative as I took it down.

"Four or five weeks before my son's death Mrs. S—— was with me—she was my friend and a psychic—and a message was given me that little Bright Eyes (control) would be with my son who was then ill with cancer. The night before his death he complained that there was a little girl about his bed and asked who it was. This was at Muskoka, 160 miles north of Toronto. He had not known what Mrs. S—— had told me, just before his death, about five minutes, he roused, called his nurse for a drink of water, and said clearly: 'I think they are taking me.'

 Afterward seeing the possible significance of this I wrote to Miss Aand asked her to see Mrs. S—— and try to find why the word 'they' was used, underscoring it in the letter, as I always supposed the boy's father would be with him at death. Miss Awent went to see Mrs. S——, and did not mention the letter. When I saw Mrs. S—— more than a week later we were having a sitting and Guthrie, my son, came and told me how he died. He said he was lying on the bed and felt he was being lifted out of his body and at that point all pain left. His first impulse was to get back into his body, but he was being drawn away. He was taken up into a cloud and he seemed to be a part of it. His feeling was that he was being taken by invisible hands into rarified air that was so delightful. He spoke of his freedom from pain and said that he saw his father beyond."

 The intimate friendship of Mrs. S—— with Mrs. G——, the mother of the boy, makes it possible to suppose that hints or suggestions may have been unconsciously conveyed to the boy before his death or that something was said at the experiment which might deprive the incidents of that importance which they superficially seem to have. The boy's experience of a strange girl at his bedside, and the allusion to the plural of the pronoun are quite possibly correct accounts of the facts. A record of the later sitting would be necessary to be assured that the allusion to the father was not in response to a suggestion.

I quote next a well authenticated instance on the authority of Dr. Minot J. Savage. He records it in his "Psychic Facts and Theories." He also told me personally of the facts and gave me the names and addresses of the persons on whose authority he tells the incidents. I am not permitted to mention them; but the story is as follows:

"In a neighboring city were two little girls, Jennie and Edith, one about eight years of age, and the other but a little older. They were schoolmates and intimate friends. In June, 1889, both were taken ill of diphtheria. At noon on Wednesday, Jennie died. Then the parents of Edith, and her physician as well, took particular pains to keep from her the fact that her little playmate was gone. They feared the effect of the knowledge on her own condition. To prove that they succeeded and that she did not know, it may be mentioned that on Saturday, June 8, at noon, just before she became unconscious of all that was passing about her, she selected two of her photographs to be sent to Jennie, and also told her attendants to bid her good-by.

 "She died at half-past six o'clock on the evening of Saturday, June 8. She had roused and bidden her friends good-by, and was talking of dying, and seemed to have no fear. She appeared to see one and another of the friends she knew were dead. So far, it was like the common cases. But now suddenly, and with every appearance of surprise, she turned to her father, and exclaimed, 'Why, papa, I am going to take Jennie with me!' Then she added, 'Why, papa! Why, papa! You did not tell me that Jennie was here!' And immediately she reached out her arms as if in welcome, and said, 'O, Jennie, I'm so glad you are here."'

 As Dr. Savage remarks in connection with the story, it is not so easy to account for this incident by the ordinary theory of hallucination. We have to suppose a casual coincidence at the same time, and while we should have to suppose this for any isolated case like the present, the multiplication of cases, with proper credentials, would suggest some other explanation.

I shall turn next to two instances which are associated with the experiments and records of Mrs. Piper. Both present the allegation of death-bed apparitions, and give statements through Mrs. Piper purporting to be communications from the deceased, showing a coincidence with what was otherwise known or alleged to have taken place at the crisis of death. The records in these cases are unusually good, having been made by Dr. Richard Hodgson. I quote his reports. The first instance is the experience of a man who gives only initials for his name, but was well known to Dr. Hodgson. It occurred at a sitting with Mrs. Piper.

"About the end of March of last year (1888) I made her (Mrs. Piper) a visit— having been in the habit of doing so, since early in February, about once a fortnight. She told me that the death of a near relative of mine would occur in about six weeks, from which I should realize some pecuniary advantages. I naturally thought of my father, who was in advanced years, and whose description Mrs. Piper had given me very accurately some week or two previously. She had not spoken of him as my father, but merely as a person nearly connected with me. I asked her at this sitting whether this person was the one who would die, but she declined to state anything more clearly to me. My wife, to whom I was then engaged, went to see Mrs. Piper a few days afterward, and she told her (my wife) that my father would die in a few weeks.

 About the middle of May my father died very suddenly in London from heart failure, when he was recovering from a very slight attack of bronchitis, and the very day that his doctor had pronounced him out of danger. Previous to this Mrs. Piper (as Dr. Phinuit) had told me that she would endeavor to influence my father about certain matters connected with his will before he died. Two days after I received the cable announcing his death my wife and I went to see Mrs. Piper, and she (Phinuit) spoke of his presence, and his sudden arrival in the spirit world, and said that he (Dr. Phinuit) had endeavored to persuade him in these matters while my father was sick. Dr. Phinuit told me the state of the will, and described the principal executor, and said that he (the executor) would make a certain disposition in my favor, subject to the consent of the other two executors when I got to London, England. Three weeks afterward I arrived in London; found the principal executor to be the man Dr. Phinuit had described. The will went materially as he (Dr. Phinuit) had stated. The disposition was made in my favor, and my sister, who was chiefly at my father's bedside the last three days of his life, told me he had repeatedly complained of the presence of an old man at the foot of his bed, who annoyed him by discussing his private affairs."

 The reader will remark that the incident is associated with a prediction, but that is not the subject under observation at present. The chief point of interest is, that the prediction refers to a will affecting private business matters, that the sister reported a number of visions or apparitions at the man's death-bed, and that after his death, apparently not known to Mrs. Piper, the statement was made by Phinuit that he had influenced or tried to persuade the man in reference to these matters. The coincidence is unmistakable and the cause is suggested by the very nature of the phenomena and the conditions under which they occurred. But we need a large mass of such incidents to give the hypothesis something like scientific proof.

The next case is a most important one. It is connected with an experiment by Dr. Hodgson with Mrs. Piper, and came as an accidental feature of the sitting. The account is associated in his report with incidents quoted by him in explanation of the difficulty and confusion accompanying real or alleged communications from the dead. It will be useful to quote the report on that point before narrating the incident itself, as the circumstances associated with the facts are important to the understanding of the case, while they also suggest a view of the phenomena which may explain the rarity of them.

"That persons 'just deceased,"' says Dr. Hodgson, "should be extremely confused and unable to communicate directly, or even at all, seems perfectly natural after the shock and wrench of death. Thus in the case of Hart, he was unable to write the second day after death. In another case a friend of mine, whom I may call D., wrote, with what appeared to be much difficulty, his name and the words, 'I am all right now. Adieu,' within two or three days of his death. In another case, F., a near relative of Madame Elisa, was unable to write on the morning after his death. On the second day after, when a stranger was present with me for a sitting, he wrote two or three sentences, saying, 'I am too weak to articulate clearly,' and not many days later be wrote fairly well and clearly, and dictated to Madame Elisa (deceased), as amanuensis, an account of his feelings at finding himself in his new surroundings."

 In a footnote Dr. Hodgson adds an account of what this Madame Elisa communicated regarding the man. I quote this in full. Referring to this F. and Madame Elisa, he says:

"The notice of his death was in a Boston paper, and I happened to see it on my way to the sitting. The first writing of the sitting came from Madame Elisa, without my expecting it. She wrote clearly and strongly, explaining that F. was there with her, but unable to speak directly, that she wished to give me an account of how she had helped F. to reach her. She said that she had been present at his death-bed, and had spoken to him, and she repeated what she had said, an unusual form of expression, and indicated that he had heard and recognized her. This was confirmed in detail in the only way possible at the time, by a very intimate friend of Madame Elisa and myself, and also of the nearest surviving relative of F. I showed my friend the account of the sitting, and to this friend a day or two later, the relative, who was present at the deathbed, stated spontaneously that F., when dying, said that he saw Madame Elisa, who was speaking to him, and he repeated what she was saying. The expression so repeated, which the relative quoted to my friend, was that which I had received from Madame Elisa through Mrs. Piper's trance, when the death-bed incident was of course entirely unknown to me."

The apparent significance of such a coincidence is evident, and its value is much enhanced by the cross reference involved in the work of Dr. Hodgson. The following incidents are perhaps less evidential, but may be trusted as actual events.

The next case is a very important one, because the percipient did not know that his teacher was dead. Unfortunately the mother took an unreasonable position in regard to narrating the facts. The state of mind of religious people on such a matter is incomprehensible, except on the ground that they take a selfish view of the question of survival after death. This determination not to help others in such matters only tends to confirm the skeptic's judgment both that there is no evidence for the belief and that the believers in it have only a selfish interest in a future life. Unfortunately this is too often true. In the present instance we have the statement of another witness and though it is not as complete as we might wish, because she had not appreciated the value of the incident, the refusal of the mother to testify is a negative confirmation of the facts.

February 4, 1907. Dr. James H. Hyslop, Dear Doctor:—

 "I am on the track of a very strange circumstance that happened in the family of a cousin of mine living in Greeley, Colorado.

 "It seems their child was dying and a very short time before death told his mother that the teacher (public school teacher) was in the room. The child's mind, so far as they could tell, was clear. The strange part is that a Very short time before, perhaps an hour or so, the teacher had suddenly died. Her death was unlooked for and the child knew nothing of it, and so far as I can learn none of those with the child knew of teacher's death. Would such a circumstance properly vouched for be of any value? I find it very hard to persuade people to relate or tell about such things. This family above mentioned are worthy people, the mother being for years a teacher in the Greeley, Colorado, schools.

Yours truly,

"DR. H. L. COLEMAN."

I wrote to Dr. Coleman asking him to make an effort to secure the lady's statement of the facts, for obvious reasons, and the following is his reply after making the attempt:

March, 15, 1907.

"Dr. James H. Hyslop.

"My Dear Sir:—

"I am sorry to inform you that I have resorted to every means to obtain from the mother of the child a full account of the vision, but she absolutely refuses to give me any information. She belongs to the class of people who regard such things as Psychical Research as unholy and wrong, though in other matters she is a woman of education and standing in society. She is strictly orthodox (a Methodist) and no influence myself or any of my friends can have on her will in any way change her views. I feel sure the case was one of great value. A cousin who talked to her about the matter told me as follows: The day before the little boy died he and his mother and the nurse were alone together in the room. The child said his Sunday school teacher was in the room with them, told how she was dressed, etc. At the time this took place the teacher, who had suddenly died, was lying in her casket. The child had not been informed of her death. The child talked to her much as one would talk to himself. The boy was regarded as very bright and was highly regarded by his Sunday school teacher. The child was about eight or ten years old. I will take the liberty to send you part of the letter from one of the cousins who has been trying to help me find out about the case. Part of the letter is personal, which you will please pardon, as I can send you nothing of value for the S. P. R., as it all came in too much round about way; I will return the stamp you sent me. If later I can find out anything more or introduce you into the case will do so, but can't now.

Yours truly,

"DR. H. L. COLEMAN."

 

I will try to answer the question you asked as near as I can; had I been talking to her myself I could have remembered it and wrote it down, but Annie didn't pay much attention to it.

"The child saw his teacher the day before he died; he did not know she was dead; he saw her soon after her death; he described the way she was dressed as she lay in her coffin. No one said anything to him about it. He talked as if talking to himself. No one saw child except the mother and nurse. This child was about eight years old and very bright; and a pet of his teacher. Now, Harry, I have written about all Annie can tell me and you will have to content yourself with this. If I get to see Clara this coming June I will talk to her myself.

Your cousin,

"ELSIE."

 

The following incident was not dated in the informant's reply, and, as it was not a new, incident, its interest has to rest on the authority of the informant. He was one of the ablest physicians in his city and himself attached some value to the facts, though not believing in a spiritistic hypothesis. The case must stand for what it is worth.

Cordially yours,

FRANK WHITEHILL H—


 

BUFFALO, N. Y., [June, 1908].

"My Dear Mr. Hyslop:—

I have not been entirely inattentive to your letter of May, though your recent note gave my purpose a needed jog.

"Mrs. H—— has asked me to lay the following facts and circumstances before you:—

"Her brother died in 1876, at the age of twenty-one, after an illness whose entire course extended intermittently over several years. His grandfather had died when he was a small boy of about five.

"The grandfather's memory was dear to his mother and her family, but during this brother's illness, and especially toward the last when he knew he was dying, it is said that the grandfather's memory was not especially recalled.

"About seven in the evening, after he had been sinking and was supposed to be dying, the family being gathered about him, he opened his eyes and said "Grandfather," and looked as though he saw some one whom he addressed thus. He lingered through the night and died the next morning early.

"So, long a time has elapsed that more detailed incidents are not available, and would scarcely be reliable, I fancy.

"An aunt of Mrs. H—— died a few years after the death of her sister, Mrs. H— —'s mother. As she was dying she in the same manner as though recognizing some One dear to her, said 'Sis'—a title she was accustomed to giving her sister. The bystanders remarked the similarity to the manner and speech of the long-time dead brother of Mrs. H——.

"So far as these incidents are of service you are welcome to make use of them without name, unless necessary for verification of their truthfulness. With kind regards I am,

The following incident came from one of my former students, now a lawyer. His special interest in the matter was not awakened until he lost his wife. At my request he reported the present incident, after narrating it to me personally. The gentleman who might have corroborated it in writing was reluctant to do so, though he confirmed it viva voce [verbally].

March 3, 1908.

"Dear Professor:—

"I wish to give you the written account which you asked for of my observation when my wife died; she was a very spiritual girl and I always imagined in consequence that she did not have a very strong grip on life and was ready— psychologically and not voluntarily—to relinquish her hold. She was the youngest of a large family and was the particular pet of her father when a girl. Both her parents had been dead about ten years. She was not in the habit of mentioning her parents particularly, and all her interests were centered in her home. The last thing she said to me before she died was that she complained of being sleepy and from then on to the end, some two hours, she was not very conscious, as far as we could see, of her surroundings. When she was in the last struggle she called out 'Mama' once or twice, and later 'Papa! Papa! take me up, they are killing me.' (I remember this distinctly.) Shortly afterwards, some ten minutes, she passed away.

"Considering that she did not frequently speak of her parents, that at and shortly prior to her death she was too weak to speak to me, but nevertheless called out in a loud voice just as she was passing away, the incident is interesting as bearing upon the mental states at such transitional periods.

Yours faithfully,

"HARRISON CLARK, JR."

The following incidents explain themselves; one of them is especially interesting because it is associated with a death vision by the lady herself of the same personality that had appeared as a warning of the death of others. That is, we have an ordinary apparition premonitory of the death of others and also of the subject herself when she died, giving a double interest to the facts and showing that the two types must have the same explanation.

 

"MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN, March 18, 1907.

"Dr. James H. Hyslop.

"Dear Sir:

"My mother used to say that whenever there was about to occur the death of a friend or relative, she saw her own mother standing beside her and looking at her. The first time that I knew of this vision of hers was when I was a girl of about twelve. My mother's most intimate friend, outside her own family, was dangerously ill. In the evening mother came from the friend's house and coming into my room got into bed with me. When I awoke in the morning mother was sitting on the edge of the bed in a brown study. I spoke to her and she roused herself and said: 'I fear Mrs. F—— is no more.' I asked her why she said that and she replied: 'Mother appeared to me just now.' Then she explained her belief that grandmother always appeared to her before the death of anyone she loved, and added: 'As I opened my eyes this morning, lying there beside you, I saw mother; standing looking over the foot-board of the bed at me, very intently.'

"In less than an hour my aunt came up from Mrs. F.'s to say that she had passed away early in the morning.

"I do not distinctly recall any other instance of this hallucination of hers until the morning before her own death, about fifteen years later. She had had an attack of pneumonia, but the doctor had said that she was better and I was feeling much easier about her. I was taking care of her alone that night. About four in the morning, when I went up to the bed to give her medicine or stimulant—I have forgotten which—she aroused from a light slumber, looked up, at me very keenly and said: 'Mother has just been with me.' The significance of it flashed over me at once and I could hardly control myself enough to give her the medicine I had in my hand. I went into the other room at once to call father to go for the doctor. Before he could arrive she had sunk into a stupor, and passed away in a few hours. Those were the last conscious words, or rather I should say intelligible words that she ever spoke to me. They were spoken in as clear and distinct a voice as she ever used.

"She died of heart failure, a reaction from pneumonia. My grandmother died a month before I was born.

"Another incident that I have only by hearsay was this: My mother told me that her father, on his death-bed, and when they thought he was just about gone, suddenly raised a little from his pillow, opened his eyes wide and called out in a glad, clear tone: 'Why, Dada!' This was the name of his wife's brother with whom, as a young man, he had been very intimate, and who had been dead for many years."

Instances of the same kind are much more numerous than those we have quoted, though they are not recorded as they should have been. One good instance, which happened in the family of Mr. James G. Blaine, mentioned in the preceding chapter, should have been recorded in detail. But the witnesses of it seem not to have appreciated its scientific interest. Probably the majority of similar incidents escape all but the immediate witnesses and generally they are regarded as too personal for scientific notice. They are not quoted here as of themselves satisfactory scientific proof of survival, though in sufficient numbers and properly observed they might be adequate even to that purpose. They at least suggest what other methods might establish or corroborate, and are so free from objections obtrusive in other phenomena that they deserve a first place among spontaneous incidents in favor of survival.

I next take up another type of apparition which requires specially good credentials to escape the suspicion of casual hallucination. But, as chance has been excluded from the explanation even of phantasms of the living, we may illustrate a type from whose interpretation telepathy is also excluded, though, apparently at least, they are not so common as phantasms of the living, including those of dying persons.

Phantasms of the dead are not easily classified as examples of telepathy. We cannot specify the agent without either unwarrantably extending the telepathy or making the deceased person the agent. The latter assumes that the facts are evidence of survival; and we may take such instances as spontaneous evidence for survival, though we may not regard this evidence as conclusive unless the facts become numerous enough and well enough established to be on the same level as experimental phenomena.

The first report of the English Committee on Haunted Houses mentions a number of good instances. One of them involves experiences by two persons.*

 "In the early spring of 1852, Mr. X. Z. went to reside in a large old house near C——. Mr. X. Z. only occupied part of the house, the remainder being inhabited by a friend of his own, Mr. G——, and some pupils. Mr. G—— had occupied the house about a year before Mr. X. Z.'s arrival; and two servants had, in that interval, given him warning, on account of strange noises which they had heard. The house, which is a large one, was let at an extremely low rent.

"On the night of the 22nd of September, 1852, at about 1 A.M. Mr. X. Z. went up to his bedroom. The house was in complete darkness, and he took no candle with him; but on opening a door which led into the passage where his room was situated, he found the whole passage filled with light. The light was white like daylight, or electric light, and brighter than moonlight. At first Mr. X. Z. was dazzled by the light, but when his eyes became used to it he saw, standing at the end of the passage, about thirty-five feet from him, an old man in a figured dressing-gown. The face of this old man, which Mr. X. Z. saw quite clearly, was most hideous; so evil was it that both expression and features were firmly imprinted on his memory. As Mr. X. Z. was still looking, figure and light both vanished, and left him in pitch darkness. Mr. X. Z. did not, at that time, believe in ghosts, and his first thought was (he had lately read Brewster's 'Natural Magic,' and had been much impressed with the striking cases of spectral illusion recorded in that work) that he was the subject of a hallucination. He did not feel at all frightened, but resolved to, take a dose of physic in the morning. The next day, however, remembering the tales told by the two servants who had left, be made inquiries in the village as to the past history of the house. At first he could find out nothing, but finally an old lawyer told him that he had heard that the grandfather of the present owner of the house had strangled his wife and then cut his own throat, on the very spot where Mr. X. Z. had seen the figure. The lawyer was unable to give the exact date of this occurrence, but Mr. X. Z. consulted the parish register, and found the two deaths recorded as having taken place on the 22nd September, 179— (the precise year he could not now (1882) remember). The lawyer added he had heard that the old man was in the habit of walking about the house in a figured dressing-gown, and had the reputation of being half an imbecile.

"On the 22nd September, 1853, a friend of Mr. G——'s arrived to make a short stay. He came down to breakfast the following morning, looking very pale, and announced his intention of terminating his visit immediately. Mr. G—— rather angrily insisted on knowing the reason of his sudden departure; and the young man, when pressed, reluctantly explained that he had been kept awake all night by the sound of cryings and groanings, blasphemous oaths, and cries of despair. The door of his bedroom opened on to the spot where the murderer had committed suicide; and it was in the bedroom which he had occupied that the murder had been committed. In 1856, Mr. X. Z. and his friend had occasion to call on their landlord, who lived in London. On being shown into the room, Mr. X. Z. at once recognized a picture above the mantel-piece as being that of the figure which he had seen. The portrait, however, had been taken when the man was younger, and the expression was not so hideous. He called Mr. G——'s attention to the painting, saying: 'That is the man whom I saw!

"The landlord, on being asked whom the portrait represented, replied that it was the portrait of his grandfather, adding that he had been no credit to the family."

 The incident lacks nothing in dramatic interest, but is old, though well authenticated. It would take many such to enforce a conclusion; and only the certification of a large number of more recent cases, such as those which "Phantasms of the Living" presents, could justify the use of such an incident for illustration. But there are similar instances.

In a paper by Mrs. Sidgwick on "Phantasms of the Dead"* an incident is recorded, which will have to be abbreviated. Its interest lies in the unconscious testimony of a child to an experience whose meaning he did not know.

A man died in 1875, leaving a widow and six children. The three eldest children were admitted to an orphanage. Three years afterwards the widow died, and then the three remaining children were admitted to the orphanage. Some visitors came one day; and, as the place was full, the warden took a bed in the little ones' dormitory. In the night he suddenly awoke and saw a soft light in the room. He saw that it was not the gas light from the hall, and, turning round, he saw a wonderful vision. Over the second bed from his, and on the same side of the room, there was floating a small cloud of light, forming a halo of the brightness of the moon on an ordinary moonlight night. In this bed slept the youngest of the six children. The warden took the trouble to note that he was not dreaming, but went to sleep again. In the morning, while dressing, this youngest child looked at the warden with an extraordinary expression, and said:

"Oh, Mr. Jupp, my mother came to me last night. Did you see her?" The warden did not answer the child, though astonished at the statement, and nothing more was said about it.

 This is practically a case of shared experience, as two persons had an experience at approximately the same time. The following is from the same list by Mrs. Sidgwick. It was received from Mrs. Windridge, whose address was given in the account.

"November 9, 1882.

"About the year 1869, I was much interested in a poor woman who was dying in my neighborhood. I used to visit her frequently, until my friends prevented me from going any more, as the excitement rendered me ill. Eventually, when she died, they concealed the fact from me for some days.

"I was taking my little boy, three years old, up to bed one evening. It was dusk; and, when half-way up the first flight of stairs, I distinctly felt a pressure and a rustling of a dress at my side, as if a woman had brushed past me. There was no one there. On the second flight the pressure was repeated, but more unmistakably. The occurrence made me so nervous that, having put the boy to bed, I decided to remain with him until my husband came in. I accordingly lay down on the bed, facing him.

"Suddenly the boy started up. 'Oh, mother, there is a lady standing behind you!' At the same moment I felt a pressure which I knew to be that of my friend. I dared not look round.

"When my husband returned, I heard for the first time that my friend had died three days before."

Again the experience was shared, and bears the marks of purpose. The next has a human interest and is from the same collection. It was recorded by the Rev. C. C. Wambey.

 "During my residence in B. C., as curate in charge, it was my custom in the summer evenings to walk over the neighboring downs.

"On the evening of Sunday, August 20, 1874, I was strolling on the downs skirting Maricombe Hill, composing a congratulatory letter, which I proposed to write and post to my very dear friend W., so that he might have it on his birthday, the twenty-second, when I bhard a voice saying, 'What, write to a dead man; write to a dead man!' I turned sharply round, fully expecting to see some one close behind me. There was no one. Treating the matter as an illusion, I went on with my composition. A second time I heard the same voice, saying, more loudly than before, 'What, write to a dead man; write to a dead man!' Again I turned round. I was alone, at least bodily. I now fully understood the meaning of that voice; it was no illusion.

"Notwithstanding this, I sent the proposed letter, and in reply received from Mrs. W. the sad, but to me not unexpected, intelligence that her husband was dead."

Here is another brief instance from the same collection; it was the only experience of Mrs. Haly, who reported it.

 "On waking in broad daylight, I saw, like a shadowed reflection, a 'Very long coffin stretching quite across the ceiling of my room, and as I lay gazing at it, and wondering at its length and whose death it could foreshadow, my eyes fell on a shadowy figure of an absent nephew, with his back towards me, searching, as it were, in my book-shelf. That morning's post brought the news of his death in Australia. He was six foot two or three inches in height, and a book, taken from that very bookcase, had been my last present to him on his leaving England.

 The next instance from the same list, a long one, is also reported by a clergyman. The writer was the Rev. Gerrard Lewis, of St. Paul's Vicarage, Margate. The account was given in a letter to Mr. Podmore. The story had been published in "Temple Bar."

 "I have nothing to add to my 'true ghost story' in 'Temple Bar.' As to dates, be died on Thursday, September 19, 1866. I saw his appearance on Sunday, September 22, and officiated at his funeral on Wednesday, September 25.

"My wife's mother had in her service a coachman named P., with one son, James Henry P., who had been brought up by friends at a distance, and was apprenticed to a trade in London. His father had only twice casually mentioned him to me, and he had almost entirely slipped out of my mind, for, with a large seaside parish on my hands, of which I was curate, my time and attention were fully taken up with matters nearer home. I mention this, lest in the course of the following story my readers should chance to think that a deep impression, previously made on my own mind, had predisposed me to see what I saw, and afterwards to regard it in a supernatural light. I cannot, therefore, too emphatically repeat that I knew next to nothing about James Henry P., my friend's son; that I had never seen him; and seldom, if ever, thought of him at all.

 "It was a hot and bright afternoon in summer, and, as if it were only yesterday, I remember perfectly well walking down the broad bright street in the broad bright afternoon. I had to pass the house of P. I remarked indeed that all his window blinds were drawn carefully down, as if to screen his furniture, of which his wife was inordinately proud, from the despoiling blaze of the afternoon sun. I smiled inwardly at the thought. I then left the road, stepped up on the side pavement, and looked over the area rails into the front court below. A young man, dressed in dark clothes, and without a hat, and apparently about twenty years of age, was standing at the door beneath the front steps. On the instant, from his likeness to my friend P., I seemed to recognize his son. We both stood and looked very hard at each other. Suddenly, however, he advanced to that part of the area which was immediately below where I was standing', fixed on me a wide, dilated, winkless sort of stare, and halted. The desire to speak was evidently legible on his face, though nothing audible escaped from his lips. But his eyes spoke; every feature in his countenance spoke, spoke, as it were, a silent language, in which reproach and pain seemed equally intermingled. At first I was startled; then I began to feel angry. 'Why,' I said to myself, 'does he look at me in that manner?' At last, annoyance prevailing over surprise, I turned away with the half-muttered thought: 'He certainly knows me by sight as a friend of his father, and yet has not the civility to salute me. I will call on the first opportunity and ask his reason for such behavior.' I then pursued my way and thought no more of what had just occurred.

"On Wednesday it was my turn to officiate at the local cemetery. On my asking who was to be buried, I was told that it was a young man from my quarter of the town, who had died of consumption. I cannot give the reason, but immediately I felt startled and ill at ease. It was not that I had the least suspicion that anything extraordinary was about to happen. I had quite forgotten young P. The feeling which I think was uppermost in my mind was annoyance at the fact that anyone should have died of such a slow disease in my parish, but without my knowledge. I asked without delay for the registrar's certificate. My eyes fell on the words, 'James Henry P., aged twenty-one years! I could scarcely believe my own senses.

"I lost but little time before calling on P. and his wife. I found the latter at home, and what she had to say only made me more uncomfortable still. James Henry P. bore such a close resemblance to his father that all who saw him remarked on the striking likeness. In addition to this, during the last three months of his life, which he spent under his father's roof, he had often wondered that I did not come to see him. His longing for an interview with me had been most intense; and every time he saw me pass the house without going in he had both felt and expressed a keen disappointment. In fact, he died terribly in earnest, wishing in vain to the last that I would come. That thought pierced me through and through. I had not gone to him, but he had come to me. And yet I would have gone, if I had but known. I blame the doctor for not telling me; I blame the parents for not sending for me; and with that awful look he gave me in my remembrance, I blame myself, though I cannot tell why.

"James Henry P. had died on the Thursday before the Sunday on which I had seen him. He had died, too, in the front room, on a level with the area, into which its window opened. He had also lain there till the Wednesday following, awaiting burial. His corpse then was lying in that very room on that very Sunday, and at the very moment, too, when I had seen his living likeness, as it were, in the area outside. Nobody, I found, had passed through the area that day; the door there had been locked and unused all the Sunday. The very milkman, the only person who called, had come by the front steps to the house; and P. and his wife were the only inmates at the time."

 Another long case follows this, and tells of the appearance of a young man, to say that he did not do what he was accused of. Inquiry showed that he had been accused of committing suicide. Later it was found that the accusation was not true. Another represents two persons seeing a phantasm, of the same person whose relation to the place was wholly unknown to them, though afterwards verified.

Mr. Myers quotes from the "Census of Hallucinations," Volume X of the English "Proceedings," a case of which that report says: "Unless we accept the hypothesis of chance coincidence, the evidence for the agency of the dead is certainly strong, because any other explanation compatible with the veracity of the narrators requires a very complicated and improbable hypothesis." The following is the narrative [p. 3831:

 

"Rio DE JANEIRO, March 12, 1892.

[After relating his first meeting, in June, 1886, with "Deolinda," a child whom he had found in great poverty and had taken charge of, and her death from consumption shortly afterwards, Senor Cabral continues:—]

"Some months passed, and my family (which now included my wife's other sister, Amelia) went to stay at a plantation belonging to friends. I escorted them thither, and returned to attend to my obligations in the city. In order not to be alone, I accepted the invitation of my friend, Barboza de Andrade, and went to live with him in S. Christovam. One!month afterwards, a sister of Barboza's, who was ill, came into his house. She grew daily worse, and after the lapse of a few months had sunk so low that we had to sit up with her at night.

"One night when I had taken my turn at nursing, I felt sleepy, and went to lie down. Two sisters, Donnas Anna Ignez Dias Fortes and Feliciana. Dias (now deceased), took my place. I had made their acquaintance but a few days before. After stretching myself on the bed, I was filled with a feeling of unbounded joy. I was happy, and could not imagine what was the cause of my happiness. I had a sensation as if some one were holding my head and placing something round it.

"Astonished at my experience, I called to the ladies who were watching in the next room, and Donna Feliciana, though from the place where she was seated she could not see me, answered me back, 'I see at your bedside a spirit child clothed in white. She places on your head a crown of roses. She says her name is Deolinda, and she comes to thank you for the kindness and charity with which you behaved to her.' I was amazed at such a declaration, for that very day was the anniversary of Deolinda's death, and neither I nor any other person in the house had recollected this. Besides, I had never spoken on the subject.

"ULYSSES CABRAL."

The two ladies write that they knew nothing of the story of Deolinda and confirm the narrative as told. The incident is especially interesting as involving a tactual phantasm by Senor Cabral himself, veridical in nature, and probably affected by the condition of the dying woman, as it is possible that phantasms of the kind require some energy supplied by the living who are in a state to generate it, a state on the borderland of death.

The next case is remarkably interesting, as it is not only a phantasm of the dead, but is accompanied by the account of a phantasm of another person definitely related to the decedent and appearing to other persons as a premonition of her death, and is also a vision of the dying person, so that it combines three characteristics of great interest. It also is quoted by Mr. Myers from the "Census of Hallucinations." Mrs. B. is the writer of the narrative.

April, 1892.

At Fiesole, on March 11, 1869, I was giving my little children their dinner at half-past one o'clock. It was a fine hot day. As I was in the act of serving macaroni and milk from a high tureen, so that I had to stand to reach it, and give my attention to what I was doing, on raising my head (as much from fatigue as for any purpose), the wall opposite me seemed to open, and I saw my mother lying dead on her bed in her little house at ——. Some flowers were at her side and on her breast: she looked calm, but unmistakably dead, and the coffin was there.

"It was so real that I could scarcely believe that the wall was really brick and mortar, and not a transparent window—in fact, it was a wall dividing the hotel in which we were living from the Carabinieri. "I was in very weak health—suffering intensely with neuralgia—having gone through 'a bad confinement, brought on by traveling, the baby was almost still born, on January 31.

"Owing to a family quarrel, I had left England without telling my people where I was going; but I was so fond of my mother that, when in Paris, I made an excuse to write to an old servant, who lived with my mother, to ask her for a toy which we had left with her,—the object being to get news of my mother. Reply came that for years she had not been so well and strong; thus I had no reason for imagining her to be dead.

"I was so distressed at the vision, that I wrote to her (my mother) to give her my address, and entreat her to let me know how she was. By return of post came the statement that she had died on March 5, and was buried on the eleventh. At the hour I saw her, she was removed from her home to Kensal Green Cemetery. She had wished to see me so much that letters had been sent to a great many continental cities, hoping I might be found; but I never got a letter from my sister till long after I had received the news of my mother's death.

"When I was married, my mother made me promise, as I was leaving home, to be sure to let her know in any way God permitted if I died, and she would try to find some way of communicating to me the fact of her death—supposing that circumstances prevented the usual methods of writing or telegraphing. I considered the vision a fulfilment of this promise, for my mind was engrossed with my own grief and pain—the loss of baby, and my neuralgia, and the anxieties of starting a new life.

"My youngest sister, since dead, was called to my mother and left Devonshire, where she was staying with friends, to come home. When she arrived at home, she entered the drawing-room, but rushed out terrified, exclaiming that she had seen godmamma, who was seated by the fire in my mother's chair. Godmamma had been dead since 1852. She had been my mother's governess—almost foster­mother; had lived with her during her married life, been godmother to her eldest girl, and when my father died had accepted the duty of taking his place as far as possible in the family, to shield her from trouble and protect her—a duty which she fulfilled nobly.

"My other sister went into the drawing-room to see what had scared K——, and saw the figure of godmamma, just as K—— had. Later in the day, the same figure stood by, then sat on the edge of my mother's bed, and was seen by both my sisters and the old servant, looking just as she had when alive, except that she wore a gray dress, and, as far as we could remember, she had always worn black. My mother saw her, for she turned towards her and said 'Mary'—her name."

This is also an instance of what the English investigators call a it compact case," which means an instance in which the parties concerned had made a promise between them to return. George Pelham was a case of the kind and Mr. Myers enumerates twelve such cases. But I turn now to some American instances of the kind; I shall only summarize the first case.

 A man died on April 12,1905. On the twentieth of May following, the sister-in-law was washing the dishes in the kitchen, and her sister was playing the piano, when the sister in the kitchen saw an apparition of her brother-in-law lying in bed straight in front of her just where she had seen him for the last month of his life. The music played on the piano was the same that the sister had played for him during his last illness.

The next case I must also abbreviate, as it is very long. It is reported by Dr. Heysinger, who took it from the autobiography of Captain Little, of the merchant service out of Baltimore. The book was entitled, "Life on the Ocean; or, Twenty Years at Sea."

 It was a clear night. All had turned in. About midnight the captain was called by the sailor on the watch, who said that there was on deck a woman dressed in black, who was calling for him. Believing the sailor to be half drunk, as was generally the case at that period, the captain drove him away; but the sailor persisted in his statement and pointed out the place where he had seen and talked with the woman. Diligent search revealed nothing and they all turned in again. About two hours later another sailor, who was a perfectly sober man, called the captain again with the same story of a woman calling for the captain. The crew corroborated his testimony. Search was made again but without effect. The sailors, being somewhat superstitious, wanted to be discharged, but the captain would not listen to it. They felt that the apparition was a premonition that the ship was going down. On the captain's stubborn refusal they went to work, and the ship stood out to sea. On the second day they encountered a terrific storm and all were fearful of the consequences. At midnight, precisely, the ghostly visitor appeared again, but neither Captain C—— nor the narrator of the story saw it. The vessel reached Martinique safely and went thence to Guadaloupe, where yellow fever seized some of the crew; during the raging of this malady the same visitor was seen again by the crew. On reaching home after the return voyage, Captain C—— received a letter saying that his wife was dead.

 

On comparing the time of her demise with that of the first appearance of the lady in black, while the ship Jay in Annapolis Roads, he found that the time exactly corresponded.

But for the subsequent apparitions this case would be classified with phantasms of the living or of those just dying. The next instance is a "compact case" and was reported to me by the Rev. A. B. Weymouth, a missionary in the Hawaiian Islands.

 

"LAHAINA, HAWAIIAN ISLANDS, October 24, 1910.

Dear Dr. Hyslop:

"When I was living in Los Angeles, California, I became acquainted with Mrs. Jennie D—— who seemed to be a congenial soul. In the autumn of 1888, Mrs. D—— and I made a verbal agreement that the one who should first enter the spiritual world should return (d.v.) and appear to the other. In the spring of 1898, the lady became seriously ill and after a few months of suffering passed away. As no tidings came from the deceased, I supposed that some unexpected obstacle prevented her return. But at last the long silence was broken. On Saturday evening, October 22, 1910, I retired to rest soon after nine o'clock. After refreshing sleep I awoke with the impression that something unusual was about to happen. Then I distinctly heard a voice saying: 'Jennie D. is coming.' A few moments later, something like a bright cloud appeared in my bedroom.

In the midst of the cloud I recognized the form of my long lost friend. While hovering in the air she sang two verses sweetly. Then other spirit forms appeared (the faces not recognized) and joined in the refrain.

I had never heard the words or the music before; and I regret that I cannot recall the words. They were very beautiful and so was the melody.

When the music ceased, the bright cloud and the celestial visitors disappeared and my room was dark again. I arose immediately, lighted a lamp, looked at my watch and made a record of the incident. The time of the vision was 12.30 on Sunday morning.

Sincerely yours,

"A. B.WEYMOUTH."

Mr. Albert J. Edmunds, librarian of the Pennsylvania Historical Society, reports a case in fuller detail than that given in the report published by the English Society, and again by Mr. Myers in his great work, "Human Personality and its Survival of Bodily Death." We shall have to abbreviate it, though it is published in detail in the "Journal," of the American Society for Psychic Research (Volume VI, PP. 439-448). The man who saw the apparition was well known to Mr. Myers, who took down the statement from this man himself. 

"In 1880 I succeeded a Mr. Q. as librarian of the X Library. I had never seen Mr. Q. nor any photograph nor likeness of him, when the following incidents occurred. I may, of course, have heard the library assistants describe his appearance, though I have no recollection of this. I was sitting alone in the library one evening late in March, 1884, finishing some work after hours, when it suddenly occurred to me that I should miss the last train to H., where I was then living, if I did not make haste. It was then 10:55, and the last train left X. at 11:05. I gathered up some books in one hand, took the lamp in the other, and prepared to leave the librarian's room, which communicated by a passage with the main room of the library. As my lamp illuminated this passage, I saw apparently at the further end of it a man's face. I instantly thought a thief had got into the library. This was by no means impossible, and the probability of it had occurred to me before. I turned back into my room, put down the books and took a revolver from the safe, and, holding the lamp cautiously behind me, I made my way along the passage which had a corner behind which I thought my thief might be lying in wait—into the main room. Here I saw no one, but the room was large and encumbered with bookcases. I called out loudly several times to the intruder to show himself, more with the hope of attracting a passing policeman than of drawing the intruder. Then I saw a face looking round one of the bookcases. I say looking round, but it had an odd appearance as if the body were in the bookcase, as the face came so closely to the edge and I could see no body. The face was pallid and hairless, and the orbits of the eyes were very deep. I advanced towards it, and as I did so I saw an old man with high shoulders seem to rotate, and with a shuffling gait walk rather quickly from the bookcase to a small lavatory, which opened from the library and had no other access. I heard no noise. I followed the man at once into the lavatory; and to my extreme surprise found no one there. I examined the window (about twelve by fourteen inches), and found it closed and fastened. I opened it and looked out. It opened into a well, the bottom of which, ten feet below, was a sky-light, and the top open to the sky some twenty feet above. It was in the middle of the building and no one could have dropped into it without smashing the glass nor climbed out of it without a ladder, but no one was there. Nor had there been anything like time for a man to get out of the window, as I followed the intruder instantly. Completely mystified, I even looked into the little cupboard under the fixed basin. There was nowhere hiding for a child, and I confess I began to experience for the first time what novelists describe as an 'eerie' feeling.

"I left the library, and found I had missed my train. Next morning I mentioned what I had seen to a local clergyman who, on hearing my description, said, 'Why, that's old Q!' Soon after I saw a photograph (from a drawing) of Q., and the resemblance was certainly striking. Q. had lost all his hair, eyebrows and all, from (I believe) a gunpowder accident. His walk was a peculiar, rapid, high-shouldered shuffle.

"Later inquiry proved he had died at about the time of year at which I saw the figure."

Two assistants in the library some time later saw a spectral light in the room in which Mr. Q. used to sit late at night writing articles. This was in 1884. About 4 P.M., April 1, 1885, Mr. J., one of the persons who had seen the spectral light, was sitting at the head of a long table, and asked Mr. Edmunds, the sponsor for this story, to stay a minute, as something was the matter with the table. The upshot of the matter was, that Mr. Edmunds, after proving that other conjectures were not correct, shouted out the suspicion that it had something to do with "old Q." What they had heard was a "half bell-like vibration, which sounded something like a tuning fork when struck and held to the ear." just as Mr. Edmunds suggested that it had something to do with "old Q.," Mr. R., who had seen the illuminated room, came in. "He was the only member of the staff that had worked under Q." The three men put their fingers lightly on the table, and, as soon as Mr. R. touched the table, the sound came ringing out of his sleeve. Two of the party rushed to R. and looked into his sleeve, but found nothing there. Recalling that such phenomena sometimes occurred on the anniversaries of deaths they decided to find out when Mr. Q. had died. A messenger was dispatched to some one who knew and he returned with the information that Mr. Q. had died on the first of April, 1880, between four and five o'clock in the afternoon.

 Mr. Edmunds then asked R. whether, when Q. was alive, he was accustomed to hear in this library any sound that at all resembled the ringing; he replied that he was. Upon that spot on the table whence the sound appeared to proceed there used to stand an old cracked gong, which when Q. wanted one of his boys, he used to strike; it sounded like the vibration which the three men had heard. Thus, on the fifth anniversary, to the very hour, of the old man's death, a phantasmal bell reminded them of his presence.

 A number of experiments were then held, and the alleged Q. was interrogated with some success. But the important fact is, that a series of shared experiences and of real or alleged messages came, strengthening the significance of the first apparition; it is only the phantasmal phenomena that are important in this connection.

 The following incident has a romantic and perhaps pathetic interest.

It was in the collection of Dr. Hodgson, which came to me after his death; and, as I knew the person who had reported it, I took the pains to have it fully confirmed. It was written out by the lady herself and reported to Dr. Hodgson in 1904. Mrs. Howell did not date her account.

 "In the year 1865 I had a lover by the name of John A. Broadhead. Owing to several circumstances I was obliged to give him up, although I was deeply attached to him. When he found that he could not marry me, he left the town of Mount Morris, where I lived, but before he left he said to me: 'Mary, I think this separation will kill me, but if I die and a spirit can come back to earth, I will come to you.'

"I replied, 'Oh, no, don't; for that would frighten me dreadfully! 'No, it would not,' he answered, 'for I should come so calmly that you would not be at all afraid.'

"In 1868 I married George R. Howell, a Presbyterian minister who knew all about my affection for John Broadhead. In April, 1871, I was visiting my old home with my husband and baby boy. About one o'clock one Sunday afternoon (I think it was April 12) I sat in the parlor of my father's house, my baby in my arms, on the long old fashioned sofa on which I had so often sat with my old lover. My husband sat across the room with his back to me, reading. The sofa was unusually long and I sat at the end of it near a door opening into the hall.

"Suddenly I felt a pressure against my knee and limb as though some one had come very close to me, and I looked up expecting to see one of my brothers, but to my great surprise saw my old lover, John Broadhead, standing there beside me. I felt greatly distressed, for he lived in a distant city. I had not seen him since 1865, and I thought it an unwarrantable intrusion that he should enter my father's house thus unannounced. It never occurred to me that he was not alive. I noticed every detail of his dress and can even now distinctly remember the black and white necktie which he wore. Before I had a chance to speak he raised his right hand and said, speaking very slowly and gently: 'Be very calm, Mary. I am what they call dead. I died in the West three weeks ago to-day.' Then, lifting his left hand, he pointed to a newspaper which lay at the other end of the sofa about three feet away from me and said: 'You will find my death in that paper.' Then without moving a muscle he vanished while I gazed at him.

"I was not at all afraid, but felt completely overcome by the shock of suddenly learning that he was dead, for, much as I loved my husband, I had never gotten over my old feeling for John Broadhead; and if it had not been for the baby in my arms I think I would have fainted away. As it was, I could not speak or call my husband, but I managed to hitch along the sofa till I could reach the paper to which he had pointed. This turned out to be a copy of the New York 'Times' that had never been taken out of the wrapper in which it had come through the mails. I tore it open and there, among the death notices, I found this paragraph:

Died in Burlington, Iowa, March 22, 1871, John A. Broadhead of this city in the thirty-fourth year of his age.'

"MARY SEYMOUR HOWELL."

It is certain that these phantasms of the dead cannot be explained by telepathy between living persons, except by proving an extension of thought-transference that has never been justified by any facts whatever. It is an interesting fact that out of the twelve cases of compact before death, three fulfilled their pledge before they died! They were very ill, near death, when they appeared to the other party to the promise, but recovered health, some of them still living when the facts were reported. This circumstance strongly supports the application of telepathy; and the scientific men who had to consider them were entirely right to pause before accepting a spiritistic interpretation of phantasms of the dying. The facts made it necessary, if phantasms of any kind were to be regarded as testimony of survival, that they should be of the type to which no proved telepathy could apply. The present instances seem to be illustrations of the desired kind. If telepathy applies to them at all, it will be that form of it which is not an alternative theory to belief in spirits, but the name of a process of communication which will apply alike to the agency of the dead and of the living. It is probable that the same process lies at the basis of all phantasms and that the differences lie only in the agents. But the main point here is that the phantasms of the dead show no traces of being initiated or instigated by the living. I have chosen for the most part those which have a teleological aspect; and teleology is not suggested by any known telepathy.

 Such phenomena, however, can never constitute the scientific proof for survival that the experimental investigator will require. It is conceivable that they might be accumulated until they did establish the probabilities so overwhelmingly that experiment would not seem imperative. But always experimental proof is more satisfactory than spontaneous phenomena. The spontaneous phenomena suggest the problem and go far toward making the conclusion reasonable, though we may feel some hesitation in each case about accepting their evidential character. They often contain features that associate them psychologically with the phenomena obtained through mediumistic sources. We cannot dwell on this circumstance. We only remark it as an additional characteristic that tends to support the genuineness and significance of the facts.

Next EXPERIMENTAL INCIDENTS