CHAPTER ELEVEN
MORE DIRECT VOICE
Sir Henry Segrave helped another speed-boat victim to prove his identity
when a Japanese visitor attended one of my voice séances. The
communication she received not only set her own mind at rest but dulled
the edge of grief of her son’s suffering. She was Mrs. Kingi Yano and
her son was named Haro.
Her husband and his brother, Shingi, had collaborated in racing motor
boats and had won deserved reputations at this sport. Then came the day
when Shingi was killed while practicing for a race. Kingi never got over
it. For five months he mourned his brother and then himself died as the
result of no more than a chill.
This was the background to Dulce Yano’s visit, and for the first hour of
the sitting she sat silent and interested, taking no active part. Then
Red Cloud said: “There is a little man here whom I must help. Hold on!”
Regular members of the circle knew that a stranger was going to manifest
for the first time. Deliberately the trumpet moved to Mrs. Yano and
stopped. Then a voice said in perfect English: “I say, Dulce, this is
Shingi.”
“Yes, Shingi,” she replied, “what have you to say?”
“Kingi and I
are here together. We do not want Haro to grieve always. He saw me die
in the boat . . . but we got the speed. He must take his university
examination in December.”
“How can I make them understand in Japan that we must stay here until
the end of the year?”
“Tell them Kingi and I say so.” “Very Well,” Mrs. Yano said quietly.
“I say, Dulce,” the voice went on quickly with obvious traces of
excitement. “Do you know who brought us here tonight? Sir Henry Segrave.
Tell Lady Segrave that her husband does much to help us here. He has
helped Kingi and me a lot. Kingi wanted to come tonight but could not
manage it. He says he will try next time. He says: “tell Haro to grieve
no more. All is well with us and we are always with him.’ “
Mrs. Yano wrote her own impressions of this séance, from which I quote:
“The voice was Shingi’s own and he had the same mannerisms as when he
was with us here. He invariably prefixed his remarks with `I say’ and
almost the first thing he said at the séance was, ‘I say, Dulce.’ I
could hardly believe my ears when he announced his name, Shingi Yano,
but then he repeated it louder and more clearly.
“Sir Henry Segrave and Shingi were known to one another. My son Haro,
was very grief stricken after the accident, and it interefered greatly
with his studies.
“Shingi had set his heart on achieving a certain speed at the trial run.
My husband was timing him. One lap had been just finished and he was at
the beginning of another when the boat overturned.
“His statement was correct. He achieved his speed.”
One of the difficulties in writing a book from the medium’s viewpoint is
that when you have been in a deep trance you are dependant on the
memories of those present for an accurate description of what
transpired. Because of this the presence of the shorthand writer at the
voice séances was invaluable. It made it possible for me to study the
word-for-word transcriptions of what was said. The result, however, was
curious, for the verbatim accounts, as I read them, produced a feeling
of complete detachment from the events described, even though I was so
intimately concerned in them. Quite often, however, verbatim
records have not been available (the present-day use of the tape
recorder has solved this problem) and so no one has been dependant for
one'’ facts on reliable eyewitnesses.
I have always
been fortunate in those who have testified to events that took place
while I have been entranced. Often they have been distinguished men and
women from many walks of life, frequently well-known writers and
journalists whose names are widely known and whose integrity is
unquestioned. Such people, knowing that Spiritualism is a controversial
subject, bring balanced and inquiring minds to each new manifestation
they witness. They accept nothing on trust, and when they write on the
subject they do so from close experience and not from hearsay.
It is because
I appreciate the value of eyewitnesses account that I asked Maurice
Barbanell’s permission to use the following extract from his recently
published, deeply-absorbing book This
Is Spiritualism. It concerns the case of Bessy Manning, of
whose existence none of us had heard until she was introduced by Red
Cloud in the course of a sitting. It is remarkable, I think, not only in
its evidence for survival after death but also as an example of the
answer to prayer. It is remarkable, too, in that it was extended to
include not only Bessy and her brother but her mother, too. This is how
Maurice Barbanell describes the case of Bessy Manning in his book:
My most moving
experience in Estelle Roberts séance room came when I was addressed by
an unknown spirit communicator. About halfway through one sitting, Red
Cloud said to me, almost casually: “There is a girl here who has
approached me to get in touch with her mother on earth. She will give
her own evidence.”
“Do I know her?” I asked.
“No,” the guide replied, “but you can help her.”
The trumpet slowly moved towards me and a voice, obviously belonging to
a young girl, said: “I will, All right. I will . . . “
From long
experience I knew that the way to get the best results was to encourage
the communicators to speak, not to ply them with questions which could
have a rebuffing effect. “Come along,” I urged, “you are going to try to
give me a message. Come and talk to me.”
The voice replied: “I will if I am allowed to talk. A kind man brought
me here.”
Then, very slowly, but distinctly, she declared: “My name is Bessy
Manning. I died with tuberculosis last Easter. I have brought my
brother, Tommy with me; he was killed by a motor car. My mother has
prayed because she reads your paper, and has asked that some day the
great guide, Red Cloud, would bring me here.”
In the psychic
journal which I edited at the time, I had described some of these voice
séances, and Bessy was indicating that her mother had read what I had
printed. “I will send a message to your mother tomorrow,” I told the
girl.
Bessy expressed gratitude and continued: “Tell mother that I still have
my two long plaits. I am twenty-two, and I have got blue eyes. Tell her
I want her to come here. Could you bring her?” Very wistfully she added,
“She is not rich – she is poor.”
“I will see if I can bring her, “ I replied.
“She is so unhappy,” Bessy went on. “She says she lost both of us. You
will help her, won’t you? God will bless you if you help her. Thank you
. . . thank you . . . . thank you . . .”
“Before I can send a message to your mother,” I told Bessy, “I must know
where she lives, for I do not know her.”
“Bessy’s reply came without hesitation. “I will tell you,” she said.
Slowly and distinctly she gave the address, “14, Canterbury Street,
Blackburn.”
“Red Cloud,” I said, “there must be thousands who pray for comfort like
her mother.”
“I have only one instrument,” he answered, with a note of sadness in his
voice.
“Will
you invite her mother to the next séance?” I asked her.
“Will I?” he replied.
“Would you?”
I had never heard of Bessy Manning. I did not know whether there was a
Mrs. Manning, or whether there was a Canterbury Street in Blackburn, but
my confidence, built on years of experience
with Red Cloud, was such that I knew the spirit information was correct.
On the following morning, without the slightest doubt in my mind, I sent
this telegram to Mrs. Manning at 14, Canterbury Street in Blackburn:
“Your daughter, Bessy, spoke to us at Red Cloud’s circle last night.” I
received no reply, so I telegraphed again. Two days later, on the
Monday, there were two letters from Mrs. Manning.
The first one read: “I don’t know whom I have to thank for the great joy
you have given me. I thank you with all my heart and soul for the
telegram I received last Saturday. I wanted to shout it from the house
tops. I laughed and cried all at once. What a wonderful spirit Red Cloud
is, and how good and kind you all are! I feel sure you will carry your
kindness further and let me know what my Bessy said.
“Oh, the
glorious happiness to me and mine! In my next letter I shall defray the
cost of the telegram. Please don’t be offended. It is only fair. How can
I ever thank you enough? That bit of paper is more to me than untold
gold. I will pray with all my heart for all of you, and especially for
Mrs. Roberts. You will tell me, won’t you, if she sent me a little
message. It is a wonderful, glorious truth, and again I thank you so
much. Also my husband and my other two daughters thank you.”
In her other letter Mrs. Manning wrote: “I have received your second
telegram. I am sorry to have caused you to have to send a second one,
and I am thankful for your wonderful kindness. You must not have
received my letter which I posted on Sunday. I was very happy to have
been able to send you a return telegram, as things are not very bright
at present. I want you to understand how grateful we all are. We would
do anything possible to repay your great goodness. You don’t know what
it means to us.
“My daughter
passed on last Easter Monday, and my son was killed nearly nine years
ago. Had it not been for getting in touch with the Spiritualist family,
I would have been raving mad. I am longing to know what Bessy said. I
want to comfort others as I have been. We don’t get real good mediums
here. It must be great to hear Mrs. Estelle Roberts and the other great
ones. I wish I had the glorious gift. Again, I thank you so very much.”
I regard Bessy Manning’s return as flawless evidence for the after-life.
No theories of telepathy or the subconscious mind can
explain it away. No suggestion of collusion or any other kind of fraud
can be entertained. Mrs. Manning had never met Estelle Roberts, or
corresponded with her or any member of her family. Neither had she
written to me or anyone who attended these voice séances. Yet her
daughter’s full name and address had been given, accompanied by a
complete message which was accurate in every detail.
Later, when I met Mrs. Manning, she told me that she had prayed night
and day for evidence that her daughter lived beyond the grave. Her
prayer had been heard and answered. How a prayer uttered in Blackburn
can produce a response in Middlesex, I do not know. All that I do know
is that it happened. This séance communication proves that some requests
are heard, and that there is an organization in the Beyond able to
provide the answer when conditions are appropriate.
I arranged for Mrs. Manning to come to London for the next voice séance.
Her husband was unemployed. It was obviously a time of difficulty for
her. I met her at St. Pancras Station, on, this, her first visit to
London. She was full of excitement as I showed her some of the sights of
the city before driving her down to Teddington, where the voice this
séances were held.
It was not long before Bessy, speaking through the trumpet, addressed
her overjoyed mother. “Ma,” she said excitedly, “it’s Bessy speaking.”
“Yes, Bessy,” replied the mother.
Her daughter was so full of excitement that half way through her
conversation the trumpet dropped, a sure sign that she could not hold
the “power.”
“Bessy,” her mother said, “this is wonderful. You know how your mother
loves you, don’t you?”
“It is wonderful,” Bessy replied. “God bless you, Ma. Tell Father not to
worry. Tommy is here too.” She added. “We are here together. Tommy is
also anxious to speak to you, Ma. It is so wonderful I don’t know how to
talk . . . I am so excited.”
The Lancashire dialect was obvious in the mother’s voice when she
answered: “Don’t get excited, love. Talk to Mother. Do you come in to
the home, Bessy?”
“You know I do,” she replied. “I’ll try to talk to you there. Day after
day you talk to my picture. You stand in front of it, you pick it up and
kiss it, and I watch you all the time.”
Later. Mrs. Manning assured me that this was true. Often, in her grief,
she would take her daughter’s photograph, kiss it and talk to it. Bessy,
to show that she knew what was happening in her own home, said to her
mother: “You were telling Father about his boots this morning, weren’t
you, Ma?”
“That is quite right,” replied Mrs. Manning.
“You said they wanted mending, didn’t you, Ma?”
“I understand what you mean Bessy,” was the answer.
“My Ma, I
called her Ma,” said Bessy. In repeating Bessy’s words to enable the
stenographer to record them verbatim, I thought that Bessy once said
“Mother.” She instantly corrected me by saying “Ma,” which was her usual
greeting for her mother.
More evidence followed as Bessy referred to the beads that her mother
was wearing, saying that these were once her property, and that she had
worn them before she died. This, I later learned, was accurate.
“It was a big
shock for you when Tommy was killed,” were Bessy’s last words to her
mother. Red Cloud followed and said, “She brought the boy, Tommy, with
her.” Then, as he so often did, he slipped another item of evidence into
his next sentence: “Tommy is named after his father.”
When the séance was over, Mrs. Manning was weeping, but they were tears
of joy, not sorrow. “I am the happiest woman in the world,” she said.
The following
morning, before she returned to Blackburn, Estelle Roberts gave Mrs.
Manning a private sitting at which, I later learned, Bessy continued to
prove her identity with detail after detail, none of which the medium
could have known. She sent messages to other members of the family, and
one to her fiancé. “Tell Billy,” she said, “that I still remember the
ring he sent me – the one I wore when I was buried.”
A few days later, Mrs. Manning sent me this letter, doubtless so that I
could have her own testimony:
“I am writing this for the comfort of others, knowing I shall be
ridiculed by some, laughed at by a few, but blessed by many. My only
son, whom I adored, was killed by a motor. He was a dear little chap,
who loved me very dearly. I was frantic – utterly crushed. I lost all
hope. All my ambitions lay buried in his grave.
“Eight years later, my daughter Bessy passed on, one of the most lovable
and sweetest girls who ever lived. Just before the end, she said, `If it
is possible at all, I will come back.’ I knew she would keep that
promise. She has come in the most unexpected manner. I had often heard
of the Red Cloud circle.
“It came as a big surprise to me to receive a telegram from Mr.
Barbanell telling me that my daughter had come through, asking for her
mother and telling them where she lived. I was astonished and overjoyed
at the news. Through his kindness it was made possible for me to go to
London and attend the circle. It was a great experience. Everywhere I
was met with kindness. I heard many spirit voices and all were
recognized. It was most amazing.
“I heard my
own daughter speak to me, in the same old loving way, and with the
self-same peculiarities of speech. She spoke of incidents that I know
for a positive fact no other person could know. I, her mother, am the
best judge, and I swear before Almighty God it was Bessy. She told me
she had brought her brother with her, told of him being killed and gave
his name. She spoke of many things that have passed in our home, things
that were far from my mind at the time.
“I thank God, with all my heart and soul. He answered my prayers, and I
have prayed, long and
often. I have no fear of socalled death. I am looking forward to the
glorious meeting with my loved ones.”
The years went by, and I forgot about Bessy and her mother. The war had
intervened, and there was so much to do. Estelle Roberts decided to
renew her voice séances in the new home to which she had moved. I was
delighted to find that her mediumship was as powerful as ever, and the
results equally as impressive.
At one of them, Red Cloud said to me: “I have a visitor for you. Hold
on.” Through the trumpet, smeared as usual with its luminous paint, I
heard the word “Hello” uttered three times. As this seemed to be a
communicator making the first effort, I spoke words of encouragement.
The woman’s tones that came through the trumpet
said: “I know that voice. You helped me very much by enabling me to talk
to my daughter.”
Quick as a flash, before she gave her name, I guessed it was Mrs.
Manning speaking, though I had not heard of her passing. She had
returned to complete the story, to say “that the glorious meeting with
my loved ones” which she had anticipated was now a reality. “I have got
Bessy and Tommy here,” she said through the trumpet. “Can you tell my
family? Just give them my love and tell them I am helping. My dear ones
would like to know.”
I sent a copy
of this spirit message to the old Blackburn address, but my letter came
back with the envelope marked “Gone away.” I was disappointed that Mrs.
Manning’s family could not have the mother’s message. Then, to my
surprise, I received a letter from another address in Blackburn. It was
written by a Mrs. J. Smith, who described herself as a daughter of Mrs.
Manning. Someone had seen a printed reference I had made to her mother’s
return and had sent Mrs. Smith a copy of it.
“I am her youngest daughter,” she wrote. “My sister and I are the only
remaining ones of the family on this earth. I can’t tell you the joy and
gladness the message gave me. I felt I wanted to run out and tell the
world. Instead of which I sat down and cried. I felt humble and ashamed
that I had begun to doubt and despair that I would ever hear of that
beloved person again.”
Her mother, she added, had suddenly died without the chance to say
farewell. She was alone when she had a seizure. By the time the
daughters reached her side, it was too late for their mother to speak.
“It was a cruel blow, for, with her passing, the sunshine of life went,”
wrote Mrs. Smith. Years had dragged on and she was beginning to despair.
Now she had received the answer to her prayers. “It is the grandest
thing that can ever happen to me,” was her summing-up.
There is an amusing sequel to the Bessy Manning story which Barbanell
does not mention in his book but which I have many times heard him tell
against himself. As examples of superb spirit proofs and of direct
answer to prayer, he recounted the case of Bessy Manning in the scores
of his lectures up and down the country. It was never omitted because it
was the perfect case. At last, reluctantly, he decided that for his own
sake, because he had wearied of
its constant repetition, he must delete it and refer to newer material.
After the first meeting at which he introduced the changed matter, he
was approached by a women whose face seemed vaguely familiar. But where
had he met her? A public lecturer meets thousands of people in the
course of over thirty years.
“Do you remember me?” the woman asked.
Barbanell looked at her again but had to confess that he could not place
her.
“I’m Mrs. Manning,” the woman said, adding disappointedly, I thought you
would have told them about my Bessy.”
Poor Barbanell! There he was in Blackburn, in Bessy’s home town, and he
had not told her dramatic story. With many of the audience having known
Bessy in life, it would have created a sensation!
Maurice Barbanell has a keen sense of humor and I know that he would be
the first to appreciate this story, told to me by one of the sitters in
a voice séance. The greatest drawback to any good direct voice
communication is tension. Once Red Cloud had brought a poor soul who was
trying desperately hard to speak but the atmosphere grew so tense he had
to abandon his effort. John, as Red Cloud calls Barbanell, said “Red
Cloud, we will pray for him.” Renowned for his repartee and wishing to
uplift the sitters Red Cloud laughingly replied, “John, charity begins
at home!” In the laughter that followed the atmosphere was relaxed and
after a short while the communicator tried again and was able to make
contact.
There have
been in my experience many cases like that of Bessy Manning which are
the direct results of prayer. One occurred at a Royal Albert Hall
meeting when Red Cloud gave me a message for a man with a name I thought
I recognized. As the message was of a delicate and private nature I made
no mention of it to the audience but noted it for later attention. After
the meeting I inquired about the name which had sounded familiar and was
not surprised to learn that it belonged to a prominent Member of
Parliament.
I asked the stewards whether this gentlemen or his wife had been
present, but nobody could tell me. In a quandary I telephoned Maurice
Barbanell. He volunteered to tell the people concerned of
the existence of this spirit message from their daughter. In less than
ten minutes the wife was on the telephone to me and I delivered the
message. Thanking me for it, she confessed: “My husband and I were in
the auditorium. I prayed every minute we were there, prayed with every
fibre of my being, that we might receive a message from our child. Thank
you, oh thank you, for what you have done.”
Another communication within this category came at a public voice séance
I gave at the Kingsway Hall, London. The details came from Mrs. Gertrude
Brooke of Cricklewood, who was present at the meeting and directly
concerned with what happened afterwards.
During the
séance Red Cloud announced that a young nurse in the spirit world would
give her own evidence. A voice was then heard to say: “My name is Olive
May Mann. I was a nurse at the Leicester Infirmary. I was killed on my
bicycle while riding with other nurses. My mother lives at Tansley, near
Matlock. Please tell her I live on still, but that I cannot be happy
until she stops grieving. She has been to a Spiritualist church and has
prayed that I will give some sign of my survival.”
The trumpet then fell to the ground with the fading of power.
After the meeting Mrs. Brooke and some friends, over coffee, discussed
this striking spirit message. They all regretted that the girl’s mother
or some friend or relation had not been present to witness the nurse’s
spirit return. For several days Mrs. Brooke deliberated, unable to make
up her mind whether she might not be meddling with things which did not
concern her if she took some positive action. At last she decided that
no harm could come from checking part of the spirit evidence with the
secretary of the Leicester Infirmary. She wrote a brief note asking if a
nurse of that name had ever been employed in the hospital. She made no
mention of the source of her information.
The reply she received was that this nurse had been engaged in the
mental wards up to some eighteen months earlier. Regrettably she had met
with an accident and had died in the hospital.
Without much difficulty Mrs. Brooke obtained the full address of the
girl’s mother in Tansley, and wrote giving the full details of the
communication. A grateful response came by return of post, expressing an
immediate intention of coming to London to call on Mrs. Brooke. The
mother was as good as her word and the two had tea. Afterwards they sat
at a table in the hope of receiving a message. They
were not disappointed, for the table spelled out: “Mother, you have made
me very happy. My love to all. Olive.”
It was inevitable that my mediumship should bring me into frequent
contact with Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. He regularly attended my meetings
at the Marylebone Spiritualist Association and more than once spoke from
the platform with me at the Queen’s Hall. I also knew his wife and
family, his sons Adrian and Denis being occasional visitors to my
direct-voice circles.
After Sir Arthur’s death, Lady Doyle and her family heard his voice at
one of these sittings. At a later séance, when they were not present, he
came and spoke at some length. On this occasion the circle comprised
some of the best known figures in Spiritualism. Bluntly, Sir Arthur’s
voice broke in on the gathering.
“Doyle speaking,” it said, “I asked permission to come for a minute to
offer congratulations on the new paper. (This was a reference to a new
psychic paper that had just been launched.) Go forward. Stand always for
truth and fear no man.”
Hannen Swaffer then thanked him for speaking to a home circle of which
he was a member and said he hoped he would come again.
“I will come whenever I can,” Doyle replied, “but it is not as easy as
it would appear. Is Mr. Craze here?”
George Craze, President of the Merylebone Association, who had often
presided for Doyle at public meetings, said he was.
“Take care of this medium,” Doyle urged him. “She is doing wonderful
work. And you, Swaffer, watch our interests in the battle for truth that
is now taking place. Great forces are opposing us, yet we must go
forever forward.”
He continued in this vein for some time. Before taking his leave he sent
a message to his wife with "all my love and affection" and one to his
son Denis, "tell him to go forward in his work.”
On another occasion Sir Arthur returned and asked to speak to Shaw
Desmond. Although Desmond did not doubt the genuineness of the
communication he thought that nothing would be lost by asking the spirit
speaker to prove his identity.
“If you are Conon Doyle,” he said, “tell me where we last met.”
Instantly the voice replied they had last met by accident in a doorway
in Victoria Street, to which each had run to escape a sudden downpour of
rain. Desmond recalled this incident.
Six days after
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle left this life, a Spiritualist memorial service
was held in the Royal Albert Hall which was packed from floor to
ceiling. Many of those present hoped that Sir Arthur would dramatically
come back and thus fulfill a promise he had made. He did return at this
huge gathering, but not in the sensational manner hoped for by his
audience.
Lady Doyle sat in the center of the platform. By her side there was a
chair deliberately left empty as a symbol of his physical absence but an
indication of his hoped for spirit presence. All around was a great
concourse of spirit people anxious to communicate with their friends.
For half an hour, by means of clairvoyance, I relayed their messages to
individuals among the mass of people in the hall. But there was no sign
of Sir Arthur. I kept looking about me, hoping he would appear. It was
not until the audience stood for two minutes’ silence as a tribute to
him, that I suddenly became aware he was standing beside me. With this
realization I became momentarily flustered. He saw it at once and
quickly calmed me. “Carry on with your work. Go on, child,” he said
reassuringly. Then he went and sat in the “empty” chair by his wife.
I carried on transmitting spirit messages until Sir Arthur got to his
feet and came over to my side. Slowly and deliberately he gave me a test
message for Lady Doyle. It was an intimate one concerning another member
of the family and referred to an event which had occurred only that
morning. It convinced Lady Doyle that it must have come from her
husband, as only she and the other member of the family were aware that
the small incident described had happened.
While giving
clairvoyance that evening a strange scene presented itself to my vision,
one that had a striking sequel some years later. I was led to a man,
wearing an open necked shirt, who was sitting near the platform.
“There is a woman here who was killed by a horse,” I told him. “Her name
is Emily Wilding Davision. She says she told her friend in the hall that
she would appear tonight.”
The man got slowly to his feet and cleared his throat. “That is correct,”
he said. “She told me she would communicate tonight. Emily is the
Suffragette who in 1913 threw herself in front of a Derby horse and died
from her injuries. As a spirit figure she is well known to me.”
Nine years passed and I was demonstrating clairvoyance at a public
meeting. I had brought a message to a man in the audience from a soldier.
“Did the woman at your side accompany you here tonight?” I asked him.
“She did.”
“She was at sometime connected with the women’s suffrage movement,” I
said.
Turning to this woman, I said: “The soldier who was here a moment ago was
accompanied by a Suffragette. She is here now. She says she knew you well
before she died on the racecourse. She tells me you have a brother on the
Other Side. Her name is Emily and she sends you this message: `I fought
for a cause; fight for yours. There is much yet to be accomplished . . .’
“ Now she was mentioning a name, a Mrs. Despard. “Are you acquainted with
Mrs. Despard?” I asked.
“I can get a message to her.”
I gave her the message and the women told us that the recipient would be
the militant Charlotte Despard, heroine of the Suffragette movement and
now ninety-five years of age.
Emily then sent a message of inspiration to the man and the incident
closed. It was not until some time later that I learned who the man was.
His name was Harold Sharp; he was a medium, and the man I had singled out
nine years earlier at the Conan Doyle memorial service.
|