|
The subject of
healing has been elaborately treated by many writers and fully deserves
all the attention that has been given to it, but the object of these
lectures is rather to ground the student in those general principles on
which all conscious use of the creative power of thought is based,
than to lay down formal rules for specific applications of it. I will
therefore examine the broad principles which appear to be common to the
various methods of mental healing which are in use, each of which derives
its efficacy, not from the peculiarity of the method, but from it being
such a method as allows the higher laws of Nature to come into play. Now
the principle universally laid down by all mental healers, in whatever
various terms they may explain it, is that the basis of all healing is a
change in belief. The sequence from which this results is as follows:—the
subjective mind is the creative faculty within us, and creates whatever
the objective mind impresses upon it; the objective mind, or intellect,
impresses its thought upon it; the thought is the expression of the
belief; hence whatever the subjective mind creates is the reproduction
externally of our beliefs. Accordingly our whole object is to change our
beliefs, and we cannot do this without some solid ground of conviction of
the falsity of our old beliefs and of the truth of our new ones, and this
ground we find in that law of causation which I have endeavoured to
explain. The wrong belief which externalizes as sickness is the belief
that some secondary cause, which is really only a condition, is a primary
cause. The knowledge of the law shows that there is only one
primary cause, and this is the factor which in our own individuality we
call subjective or sub-conscious mind. For this reason I have insisted on
the difference between placing an idea in the sub-conscious mind, that is,
on the plane of the absolute and without reference to time and space, and
placing the same idea in the conscious intellectual mind which only
perceives things as related to time and space. Now the only conception you
can have of yourself in the absolute, or unconditioned, is as purely
living Spirit, not hampered by conditions of any sort, and therefore
not subject to illness; and when this idea is firmly impressed on the
sub-conscious mind, it will externalize it. The reason why this process is
not always successful at the first attempt is that all our life we have
been holding the false belief in sickness as a substantial entity in
itself and thus being a primary cause, instead of being merely a negative
condition resulting from the obsence of a primary cause; and a
belief which has become ingrained from childhood cannot be eradicated at a
moment's notice. We often find, therefore, that for some time after a
treatment there is an improvement in the patient's health, and then the
old symptoms return. This is because the new belief in his own creative
faculty has not yet had time to penetrate down to the innermost depths of
the subconscious mind, but has only partially entered it. Each succeeding
treatment strengthens the sub-conscious mind in its hold of the new belief
until at last a permanent cure is effected. This is the method of
self-treatment based on the patient's own knowledge of the law of his
being.
But “there is not
in all men this knowledge,” or at any rate not such a full recognition of
it as will enable them to give successful treatment to themselves, and in
these cases the intervention of the healer becomes necessary. The only
difference between the healer and the patient is that the healer has
learnt how to control the less self-conscious modes of the spirit by the
more self-conscious mode, while the patient has not yet attained to this
knowledge; and what the healer does is to substitute his own objective or
conscious mentality, which is will joined to intellect, for that of the
patient, and in this way to find entrance to his sub-conscious mind and
impress upon it the suggestion of perfect health.
The question then
arises, how can the healer substitute his own conscious mind for that of
the patient? and the answer shows the practical application of those very
abstract principles which I have laid down in the earlier sections. Our
ordinary conception of ourselves is that of an individual personality
which ends where another personality begins, in other words that the two
personalities are entirely separate. This is an error. There is no such
hard and fast line of demarcation between personalities, and the
boundaries between one and another can be increased or reduced in rigidity
according to will, in fact they may be temporarily removed so completely
that, for the time being, the two personalities become merged into one.
Now the action which takes place between healer and patient depends on
this principle. The patient is asked by the healer to put himself in a
receptive mental attitude, which means that he is to exercise his volition
for the purpose of removing the barrier of his own objective personality
and thus affording entrance to the mental power of the healer. On his side
also the healer does the same thing, only with this difference, that while
the patient withdraws the barrier on his side with the intention of
admitting a flowing-in, the healer does so with the intention of allowing
a flowing-out: and thus by the joint action of the two minds the barriers
of both personalities are removed and the direction of the flow of
volition is determined, that is to say, it flows from the healer as
actively willing to give, towards the patient as passively willing to
receive, according to the universal law of Nature that the flow must
always be from the plenum to the vacuum. This mutual removal
of the external mental barrier between healer and patient is what is
termed establishing a rapport between them, and here we find one
most valuable practical application of the principle laid down earlier in
this book, that pure spirit is present in its entirety at every point
simultaneously. It is for this reason that as soon as the healer realizes
that the barriers of external personality between himself and his patient
have been removed, he can then speak to the sub-conscious mind of the
patient as though it were his own, for both being pure spirit the
thought of their identity makes them identical, and both are
concentrated into a single entity at a single point upon which the
conscious mind of the healer can be brought to bear, according to the
universal principle of the control of the subjective mind by the objective
mind through suggestion. It is for this reason I have insisted on the
distinction between pure spirit, or spirit conceived of apart from
extension in any matrix and the conception of it as so extended. If we
concentrate our mind upon the diseased condition of the patient we are
thinking of him as a separate personality, and are not fixing our mind
upon that conception of him as pure spirit which will afford us effectual
entry to his springs of being. We must therefore withdraw our thought from
the contemplation of symptoms, and indeed from his corporeal personality
altogether, and must think of him as a purely spiritual individuality, and
as such entirely free from subjection to any conditions, and consequently
as voluntarily externalizing the conditions most expressive of the
vitality and intelligence which pure spirit is. Thinking of him thus, we
then make mental affirmation that he shall build up outwardly the
correspondence of that perfect vitality which he knows himself to be
inwardly; and this suggestion being impressed by the healer's conscious
thought, while the patient's conscious thought is at the same time
impressing the fact that he is receiving the active thought of the healer,
the result is that the patient's sub-conscious mind becomes thoroughly
imbued with the recognition of its own life-giving power, and according to
the recognized law of subjective mentality proceeds to work out this
suggestion into external manifestation, and thus health is substituted for
sickness.
It must be
understood that the purpose of the process here described is to strengthen
the subject's individuality, not to dominate it. To use it for domination
is inversion, bringing its appropriate penalty to the operator.
In this
description I have contemplated the case where the patient is consciously
co-operating with the healer, and it is in order to obtain this
co-operation that the mental healer usually makes a point of instructing
the patient in the broad principles of Mental Science, if he is not
already acquainted with them. But this is not always advisable or
possible. Sometimes the statement of principles opposed to existing
prejudices arouses opposition, and any active antagonism on the patient's
part must tend to intensify the barrier of conscious personality which it
is the healer's first object to remove. In these cases nothing is so
effective as absent treatment. If the student has grasped all that
has been said on the subject of spirit and matter, he will see that in
mental treatment time and space count for nothing, because the whole
action takes place on a plane where these conditions do not obtain; and it
is therefore quite immaterial whether the patient be in the immediate
presence of the healer or in a distant country. Under these circumstances
it is found by experience that one of the most effectual modes of mental
healing is by treatment during sleep, because then the patient's whole
system is naturally in a state of relaxation which prevents him offering
any conscious opposition to the treatment. And by the same rule the healer
also is able to treat even more effectively during his own sleep than
while waking. Before going to sleep he firmly impresses on his subjective
mind that it is to convey curative suggestion to the subjective mind of
the patient, and then, by the general principles of the relation between
subjective and objective mind this suggestion is carried out during all
the hours that the conscious individuality is wrapped in repose. This
method is applicable to young children to whom the principles of the
science cannot be explained; and also to persons at a distance: and indeed
the only advantage gained by the personal meeting of the patient and
healer is in the instruction that can be orally given, or when the patient
is at that early stage of knowledge where the healer's visible presence
conveys the suggestion that something is then being done which could not
be done in his absence; otherwise the presence or absence of the patient
are matters perfectly indifferent. The student must always recollect that
the sub- conscious mind does not have to work through the intellect
or conscious mind to produce its curative effects. It is part of the
all-pervading creative force of Nature, while the intellect is not
creative but distributive.
From mental
healing it is but a step to telepathy, clairvoyance and other, kindred
manifestations of transcendental power which, are from time to time
exhibited by the subjective entity and which follow laws as accurate as
those which govern what we are accustomed to consider our more normal
faculties; but these subjects do not properly fall within the scope of a
book whose purpose is to lay down the broad principles which underlie
all spiritual phenomena. Until these are clearly understood the
student cannot profitably attempt the detailed study of the more interior
powers; for to do so without a firm foundation of knowledge and some
experience in its practical application would only be to expose himself to
unknown dangers, and would be contrary to the scientific principle that
the advance into the unknown can only be made from the standpoint of the
known, otherwise we only come into a confused region of guess-work without
any clearly defined principles for our guidance. |