|
TIME FROM THE
STANDPOINT OF EXPERIMENT AND OF CONSCIOUS EXPERIENCE
In some moment of
“sudden light” what one of us has not been able to say, with Rossetti,
“I have been
here before,
But when or how I cannot tell.”
Are such strange
hauntings of our House of Life due to the cyclic return of time?
Perhaps,—but what is time?
Suppose some one
should ask you, “What is an hour?” Your answer might be, “It is the
interval marked off by the clock-hand between 1 and 2.” “But what if your
clock is running down or speeding up?” To this you would probably reply,
“The clock is set and corrected by the earth, the sun and the stars, which
are constant in their movements.” But they are not. The earth is
known to be running slow, by reason of tide friction, and this is likely
to continue until it will revolve on its axis, not once a day, but once a
year, presenting always the same face to the sun.
We can only
measure time by uniform motion. Observe the vicious circle. Uniform
motion means the covering of equal spaces in equal times. But how are we
to determine our equal times? Ultimately we have no other criterion save
the uniform motion of the clock-hand or the star dial. The very
expressions, “uniform motion,” “equal times,” beg the whole question of
the nature of time.
Let us then, in
this predicament, consider time not from the standpoint of experiment, but
of conscious experience—what Bergson calls “real duration.”
Every point along
the line of memory, of conscious experience, has been traced out by that
unresting stylus we call “the present moment.” The question of its rate of
motion we will not raise, as it is one with which we have found ourselves
impotent to deal. We believe on the best of evidence that the conscious
experience of others is conditioned like our own. For better understanding
let us have recourse to a homely analogy: let us think of these more or
less parallel lines of individual experience in the semblance of the
strands of a skein of flax. Now if, at the present moment, this
skein were cut with a straight knife at right angles to its length, the
cut end would represent the time plane—that is, the present moment
of all—and it would be the same for all providing that the time plane were
flat But is it really flat? Isn't the straightness of the knife a
mere poverty of human imagination? Existence is always richer and more
dramatic than any diagram.
“Line in nature is
not found;
Unit and universe are round.
In vain produced, all rays return;
Evil will bless and ice will burn.”
Undoubtedly the
flat time-plane represents with fair accuracy the temporal conditions that
obtain in the human aggregate in this world under normal conditions of
consciousness, but if we consider our relation to intelligent beings upon
distant worlds of the visible universe the conditions might be widely
different The time section corresponding to what our straight knife made
flat in the case of the flax may be—nay, probably is—strongly curved.
RELATIVITY
This crude
analogy haltingly conveys what is meant by curved time. It is an idea
which is implicit in the Theory of Relativity. This theory has profoundly
modified many of our basic conceptions about the universe in which we are
immersed. It is outside the province of this book and beyond the power of
its author even so much as to sketch the main outlines of this theory, but
certain of its conclusions are indispensable, since they baldly set forth
our dilemma in regard to the measurement of space and time. We can measure
neither except relatively, because they must be measured one by the other,
and no matter how they vary, these variations always compensate one
another, leaving us in the same state of ignorance that we were in before.
Suppose that two
intelligent beings, one on Mars, let us say, and the other on the earth,
should attempt to establish the same moment of time, by the
interchange of light signals, or by any other method which the most
rigorous science could devise. Assume that they have for this purpose two
identically similar and mechanically perfect chronometers, and that every
difficulty of manipulation were successfully overcome. Their experiment
could end only in failure, and the measure of this failure neither one, in
his own place, could possibly know. If, after the experiment, the Martian,
chronometer in hand, could be instantly and miraculously transported to
the earth, and the two settings compared, they would be found to be
different: how different, we do not know.
The reason for
the failure of any such experiment anywhere conducted can best be made
plain by a crude paraphrase of a classic proposition from Relativity.
Suppose it is required to determine the same moment of time at two
different places on the earth's surface, as must be attempted in finding
their difference in longitude. Take the Observatory at Greenwich for one
place, and the observatory at Washington for the other. At the moment the
sun is on the meridian of Greenwich, the exact time of crossing is noted
and cabled to Washington. The chronometer at Washington is set
accordingly, and the time checked back to Greenwich. This message arrives
two seconds, say, after the original message was sent. Washington is at
once notified of this double transmission interval. On the assumption that
HALF of it represents the time the message took to travel from east to
west, and the other half the time from west to east again, the
Washington
chronometer is set one second ahead of the signalled time, to compensate
for its part of the loss. When the sun has reached the meridian of
Washington,
the whole process is repeated, and again as before, half of the time the
message has taken to cross and recross the Atlantic is added to the
Greenwich record of noon at Washington. The number of hours, minutes,
seconds, and fractions of a second between these two corrected records
represents the difference in solar time between the two places, and
incidentally the same moment of time has been established for both—at
least, so it would appear.
But is it
established? That each message took an equal time to travel each way is
pure assumption, and happens to be a false one. The accuracy of the result
is vitiated by a condition of things to which the Relativists have called
attention. Our determination might be defended if Washington and Greenwich
could be assumed to remain at rest during the experiments, and some
argument might even be made in its favor if we could secure any cosmic
assurance that the resultant motion of the earth should be the same when
Greenwich signalled its noon to Washington and Washington its noon to
Greenwich.
Our present
discussion is merely illustrative, or diagrammatic; so we will neglect the
velocity of the earth in its orbit round the sun, some forty times greater
than that of a cannon ball, and the more uncertain and more vertiginous
speed of the whole solar system towards its unknown goal. Let us consider
only the rotation of the earth on its axis, the tide-speed of day and
night. To fix our idea, this may be taken, in our latitudes, at eighteen
thousand miles per day, or perhaps half the speed of a Mauser rifle
bullet.
So fast, then,
will Washington have been moving to meet the message from Greenwich. So
fast will Greenwich have been retreating from Washington's message.
Now the ultimate
effect of motion on the time-determination cannot be calculated along any
such simple lines as these. Indeed, it cannot be exactly calculated at
all, for we have not all the data. But there is certainly some
effect. Suppose one rows four miles up a river against a current of two
miles per hour, at a rowing speed of four miles per hour. This will take
two hours, plainly. The return trip with the river's gift of two miles per
hour will evidently require but forty minutes. Two hours and forty
minutes for the round trip, then, of eight miles.
Now then, to row
eight miles in still water, according to our supposition, would have
required but two hours. But, some one objects, the current must
help the return trip as much as it hindered the outgoing! Ah, here is the
snare that catches rough-and-ready common sense! How long would the double
journey have taken if the river current had been faster than our rowing
speed? How shall we schedule our trip if we cannot learn the correct
speed, or if it varies from minute to minute?
These
explanations are necessarily symbolistic rather than demonstrative, but
any one who will seriously follow out these lines of thought, or, still
better, study the attitude of the hard-headed modern physicist towards our
classical geometry and mechanics, cannot fail to realize how conventional,
artificial—even phantasmal—are the limitations set by the primitive idea
of flat space and straight time.
The inferences
which we may draw from our hypothetical experiment are plain. The settings
of the two chronometers would be defective, they would not show the same
time, but each of them would mark the local time, proper to its own
place. There would be no means of detecting the amount of error, since the
messages were transmitted by a medium involved with them in their
transportation. If only local time can be established, the possibility of
a warped time-plane—the curvature of time—is directly opened up. Doubtless
it is true that on so relatively minute a scale as is offered by the
earth, any deviation from perfect flatness of the time-plane would be so
inconsiderable and imperceptible as to make it scientifically negligible;
but this by no means follows when we consider our relation to other worlds
and other systems.
A similar
condition holds with regard to space-distortion. The Theory of Relativity
enforces the conclusion that from the standpoint of our conventions in
regard to these matters, all bodies involved in transportation undergo a
contraction in the direction of that transportation, while their
dimensions perpendicular to the transportation remain invariable. This
contraction is the same for all bodies. For bodies of low velocity, like
the earth, this distortion would be almost immeasurably slight; but great
or little, no measuring instruments on the body transporting would ever
disclose it, for a measure would undergo the same contraction as the thing
measured.
THE SPOON-MAN
These concepts
that space and time are not as immutable as they appear: that our universe
may suffer distortion, that time may lag or hasten without our being in
the least aware, may be made interestingly clear by an illustration first
suggested by Helmholtz, of which the following is in the nature of a
paraphrase.
If you look at
your own image in the shining surface of a teapot, or the back of a silver
spoon, all things therein appear grotesquely distorted, and all distances
strangely altered. But if you choose to make the bizarre supposition that
this spoon-world is real, and your image—the spoon-man—a thinking and
speaking being, certain interesting facts could be developed by a
discussion between yourself and him.
You say, “Your
world is a distorted transcript of the one in which I live.”
“Prove it to me,”
says the spoon-man.
With a foot-rule
you proceed to make measurements to show the rectangularity of the room in
which you are standing. Simultaneously he makes measurements giving the
same numerical results; for his foot-rule shrinks and curves in the exact
proportion to give the true number of feet when he measures his shrunken
and distorted rear wall. No measurement you can apply will prove you in
the right, nor him in the wrong. Indeed he is likely to retort upon you
that it is your room which is distorted, for he can show that in spite of
all its nightmare aspects his world is governed by the same orderly
geometry that governs yours.
The above
illustration deals purely with space relations, for such relations are
easily grasped; but certain distortions in time relations are no less
absolutely imperceptible and unprovable. So far from having any advantage
over the spoon-man, our plight is his. The Principle of Relativity
discovers us in the predicament of the Mikado's “prisoner pent,” condemned
to play with crooked cues and elliptical billiard balls, and of the opium
victim, for whom “space swells” and time moves sometimes swift and
sometimes slow.
THE ORBITAL
MOVEMENT OF TIME
Now if our space
is curved in higher space, since such curvature is at present undetectable
by us, we must assume, as Hinton chose to assume, that it curves in the
minute, or, as some astronomers assume, that its curve is vast. These
assumptions are not mutually exclusive: they are quite in analogy with the
general curvature of the earth's surface which is in no wise interfered
with by the lesser curvatures represented by mountains and valleys. It is
easiest to think of our space as completely curved in higher space in
analogy with the surface of a sphere.
Similarly, if
time is curved, the idea of the cyclic return of time naturally (though
not inevitably) follows, and the division of the greater cycles into
lesser loops; for it is easier to assign this elliptical movement to time
than any other, by reason of the orbital movements of the planets and
their satellites. What results from conceptions of this order? Amazing
things! If our space is curved in higher space, you may be looking toward
the back of your own head. If time flows in cycles, in travelling toward
to-morrow you may be facing yesterday.
This “eternal
return,” so far from being a new idea, is so old that it has been
forgotten. Its reappearance in novel guise, along with so many other
recrudescences, itself beautifully illustrates time curvature in
consciousness. Yugas, time cycles, are an integral and inexpugnable
part of Oriental metaphysics. “Since the soul perpetually runs,” says
Zoroaster, “in a certain space of time it passes through all things, which
circulation being accomplished, it is compelled to run back again through
all things, and unfold the same web of generation in the world.” Time
curvature is implicit in the Greek idea of the iron, bronze, silver, and
golden ages, succeeding each other in the same order: the winter,
seed-time, summer and harvest of the larger year. Astrology, seership,
prophecy, become plausible on the higher-time hypothesis. From this point
of view history becomes less puzzling and paradoxical. What were the
Middle Ages but a forgetting of Greek and Roman civilization, and what was
the Renaissance but a remembering of them—a striving to re-create the
ruined stage-settings and to re-enact the urbane play of Pagan life. The
spirit of the Crusades is now again animate throughout Europe. Nations are
uniting in a Holy War against the Infidel de nos jours.
But it is in the
individual consciousness that time curvature receives its most striking
confirmation—those lesser returns and rhythms to which we give the name of
periodicity. Before considering these, however, a fundamental fallacy of
the modern mind must be exposed.
MATERIALITY THE
MIRROR OF CONSCIOUSNESS
Our vicious habit
of seeking the explanation of everything—even thought and emotion—in
materiality, has betrayed us into the error of attributing to organic and
environic changes the very power by which they are produced. We are wont
to think of feeling, the form in which Being manifests to consciousness,
as an effect instead of as a cause. When Sweet Sixteen becomes suddenly
and mysteriously interesting to the growing boy, it is not because sex has
awakened in his body, but because the dread time has come for him to
contemplate the Idea of Woman in his soul. If you are sleepy, it is not
because the blood has begun to flow away from your brain, but because your
body has begun to bore you. Night has brought back the Idea of Freedom,
and consciousness chloroforms the thing that clutches it. If you are ill,
you grow cold or your temperature rises: it is the signal by which you
know that your consciousness is turning toward the Idea of Pain.
Just as a savage
looks for a man behind a mirror, we foolishly seek in materiality for that
which is not there. The soul determines circumstance: the soul contains
the event which shall befall. The organic and environic rearrangements
incident to obscure rotations in higher space are like the changes a
mirror-image undergoes as an object draws near and then recedes from its
plane. This is only a figure of speech, but it is susceptible of almost
literal application. Ideas, emerging from the subconscious, appproach,
intersect, recede from, and re-approach the stream of conscious
experience; taking the forms of aversions and desires, they register
themselves in action, and by reason of time curvature, everything that
occurs, recurs.
PERIODICITY
We recognize and
accept this cyclic return of time in such familiar manifestations of it as
Nature affords in periodicity. We recognize it also in our mental
and emotional life, when the periods can be co-ordinated with known
physical phenomena, as in the case of the wanderlust which comes in the
mild melancholy of autumn, the moods that go with waning day, and winter
night. It is only when these recurrences do not submit themselves to our
puny powers of analysis and measurement that we are incredulous of a
larger aspect of the law of time-return. Sleep for example, is not less
mysterious than death which, too, may be but “a sleep and a forgetting.”
The reason that sleep fails to terrify us as death does is because
experience has taught that memory leafs the chasm. Why should death
bedreaded any more than bedtime? Because we fear that we shall forget. But
do we really forget? As Pierre Janet so tersely puts it, “Whatever has
gone into the mind may come out of the mind,” and in a subsequent chapter
this aphorism will be shown to have extension in a direction of which the
author of it appears not to have been aware. Memory links night to night
and winter to winter, but such things as “the night-time of the spirit”
and “the winter of our discontent” are not recognized as having either
cause or consequence. Now though the well-springs of these states of
consciousness remain obscure, there is nothing unreasonable in believing
that they are recrudescences of far-off, forgotten moods and moments;
neither is it absurd to suppose that they may be related to the movements
and positions of the planets, as night and winter are related to the axial
and orbital movements of the earth.
But there are
other, and even more interesting, evidences of time curvature in
consciousness. These lead away into new regions which it is our pleasure
now to explore.
SLEEP
Our space is
called three-dimensional because it takes three numbers—measurement in
three mutually perpendicular directions—to determine and mark out any
particular point from the totality of points. Time, as the individual
experiences it, is called one-dimensional for an analogous reason: one
number is all that is required to determine and mark out any particular
event of a series from all the rest. Now in order to establish a position
in a space of four dimensions it would be necessary to measure in four
mutually perpendicular directions. Time curvature opens up the possibility
of a corresponding higher development in time: one whereby time would be
more fittingly symbolized by a plane than by a linear figure. Indeed, the
familiar mystery of memory calls for such a conception. Memory is a
carrying forward of the past into the present, and the fact that we can
recall a past event without mentally rehearsing all the intermediate
happenings in inverse order, shows that in the time aspect of memory there
is simultaneity as well as sequence—time ceases to be linear and becomes
plane. More remarkable illustrations of the sublimation of the
time-sense are to be found in the phenomena of sleep and dreams.
“Oh, thou that
sleepest, what is sleep?” asks the curious Leonardo. Modern psychological
science has little to offer of a positive nature in answer to this
world-old question, but it has at least effectively disposed of the absurd
theories of the materialists who would have us believe that sleep is a
mere matter of blood circulation or of intoxication by accumulation of
waste products in the system. Sleep states are not abnormal, but part and
parcel of the life existence of the individual. When a person is asleep he
has only become unresponsive to the mass of stimuli of the external world
which constitutes his environment. As Sidis says, “When our interest in
external existence fags and fades away, we go to sleep. When our interests
in the external world cease, we draw up the bridges, so to say, interrupt
all external communication as far as possible, and become isolated in our
own fortress and repair to our own world of organic activity and inner
dream life. Sleep is the interruption of our intercourse with the external
world: it is the laying down of our arms in the struggle of life. Sleep is
a truce with the world.”
The twin concepts
of higher space and curved time sanction a view of sleep even bolder.
Sleep is more than a longing of the body to be free of the flame which
consumes it: the flame itself aspires to be free—that is to say,
consciousness, tiring of its tool, the brain, and of the world, its
workshop, takes a turn into the plaisance of the fourth dimension, where
time and space are less rigid to resist the fulfillment of desire.
DREAMS
We find a
confirmation of this view in dream phenomena. But however good the
evidence, we shall fail to make out a case unless dream experiences are
conceded to be as real as any other. The reluctance we may have to make
this concession comes first from the purely subjective character of
dreams, and secondly from their triviality and irrationality—it is as
though the muddy sediment of daytime thought and feeling and that alone
were there cast forth. In answer to the first objection, advanced
psychology affirms that the subconscious mind, from which dreams arise,
approaches more nearly to the omniscience of true being than the rational
mind of waking experience. The triviality and irrationality of dreams are
sufficiently accounted for if the dream state is thought of as the meeting
place of two conditions of consciousness: the foam and flotsam “of
perilous seas in faery lands forlorn,” whose vastitude, whose hidden life,
and rich argosies of experience, can only be inferred from the fret of the
tide on their nether shore—the tired brain in sleep.
For it is the
remembered dream alone that is incoherent—the dream that comes clothed
in the rags and trappings of this work-a-day world, and so leaves some
recoverable record on the brain. We all feel that the dreams we cannot
remember are the most wonderful. Who has not wakened with the sense of
some incommunicable experience of terror or felicity, too strange and
poignant to submit itself to concrete symbolization, and so is groped for
by the memory in vain? We know that dreams grow more ordered and
significant as they recede from the surface of consciousness to its
depths. Deep sleep dreams are in the true sense clairvoyant, though for
the most part irrecoverable— “Canst thou draw out Leviathan with an hook?”
DuPrel and others have shown that the difference between ordinary
dreaming, somnambulance, trance and ecstasy, is only a matter of
redistribution of thresholds—that they are all related states and merge
into one another. We have, therefore, every right to believe that for a
certain number of hours out of the twenty-four we are all sybils and
seers, however little most of us are able to profit by it. Infrequently,
in moments of peculiar susceptibility, the veil is lifted, but the art of
dreaming true remains for the most part unmastered—one of the precious
gifts which the future holds in store for the sons and daughters of men.
The partial
waking state is the soil in which remembered dreams develop most
luxuriously. Paradoxical as it may sound, they are the product, not of our
sleep, but of our waking. Such dreams belong to both worlds, partly to the
three-dimensional and partly to the four-dimensional. While dreams are
often only a hodge-podge of daytime experiences, their incredible
rapidity, alien to that experience, gives us our first faint practicable
intimation of a higher development of time.
TIME IN DREAMS
The unthinkable
velocity of time in dreams may be inferred from the fact that between the
moment of impact of an impression at the sense-periphery and its reception
at the center of consciousness—moments so closely compacted that we think
of them as simultaneous—a coherent series of representations may take
place, involving what seem to be protracted periods for their unfoldment.
Every reader will easily call to mind dream experiences of this character,
in which the long-delayed denouement was suggested and prepared for by
some extraneous sense-impression, showing that the entire dream drama
unfolded within the time it took that impression to travel from the skin
to the brain.
Hasheesh dreams,
because they so often occur during some momentary lapse from normal
consciousness and are therefore measurable by its time scale, are
particularly rich in the evidence of the looping of time. Fitzhugh Ludlow
narrates, in The Hasheesh Eater, the dreams that visited him in the
brief interval between two of twenty or more awakenings, on his walk
homeward after his first experience with the drug. He says, “I existed by
turns in different places and various states of being. Now I swept my
gondola through the moonlit lagoons of Venice. Now Alp on Alp towered
above my view, and the glory of the coming sun flashed purple light upon
the topmost icy pinnacle. Now in the primeval silence of some unexplored
tropical forest I spread my feathery leaves, a giant fern, and swayed and
nodded in the spice-gales over a river whose waves at once sent up clouds
of music and perfume. My soul changes to a vegetable essence, thrilled
with a strange and unimagined ecstasy.”
Earlier in the
same evening, when he was forced to keep awake in order not to betray his
condition, the dream time-scale appears to have imposed itself upon his
waking consciousness with the following curious effect. A lady asked him
some question connected with a previous conversation. He says, “As
mechanically as an automaton I began to reply. As I heard once more the
alien and unreal tones of my own voice, I became convinced that it was
some one else who spoke, and in another world. I sat and listened: still
the voice kept speaking. Now for the first time I experienced that vast
change which hasheesh makes in all measurements of time. The first word of
the reply occupied a period sufficient for the action of a drama; the last
left me in complete ignorance of any point far enough back in the past to
date the commencement of the sentence. Its enunciation might have occupied
years. I was not in the same life which had held me when I heard it
begun.”
This well-known
fact, that we cannot measure dreams by our time scale, proves that
subjective time does not correspond with objective, and that the “dream
organ” of consciousness has a time scale of its own. If in our waking
state we experience one kind of time, and in dreams quite another, the
solution of the mystery should be sought in the vehicle of
consciousness, for clearly the limit of impressionability or power of
response of the vehicle establishes the time scale, just as the size of
the body with relation to objects establishes the space scale. Time must
be different for the ant and the elephant, for example, as space is
different.
Our sense of time
is wholly dependent upon the rapidity with which impressions succeed one
another. Were we capable of receiving only one impression an hour, like a
bell struck every hour with a hammer, the ordinary term of life would seem
very short. On the other hand, if our time sense were always as acute as
it is in dreams, uncounted aeons would seem to be lived through in the
interval between childhood and old age.
Imagine a music
machine so cunningly constructed and adjusted as not only to sound each
note and chord in its proper sequence and relation, but to regulate also
the duration of the sound vibration. If this machine were operated in such
a manner as to play, in a single second of time, the entire overture of an
opera which would normally occupy half an hour, we should hear only an
unintelligible noise a second long. This would be due to no defect in the
sound-producing mechanism, but to the limitations of the
sound-receiving mechanism, our auditory apparatus. Could this be
altered to conform to the unusual conditions—could it capture and convey
to consciousness every note of the overture in a second of time—that
second would seem to last half an hour, provided that every other
criterion for the measurement of duration were denied for the time being.
Now dreams
seem long: we only discover afterwards and by accident their almost
incredible brevity. May we not—must we not—infer from this that the body
is an organ of many stops and more than one keyboard, and that in sleep it
gives forth this richer music. The theory of a higher-dimensional
existence during sleep accounts in part for the great longing for sleep.
“What is it that is much desired by man, but which they know not while
possessing?” again asks Leonardo. “It is sleep,” is his answer. This
longing for sleep is more than a physical longing, and the refreshment it
brings is less of the flesh than of the spirit. It is possible to
withstand the deprivation of food and water longer and better than the
deprivation of sleep. Its recuperative power is correspondingly greater.
Experiments have
been made with mature University students by which they have been kept
awake ninety-six hours. When the experiments were finished, the young men
were allowed to sleep themselves out, until they felt they were thoroughly
rested. All awoke from a long sleep completely refreshed, but the one who
took longest to restore himself from his protracted vigil slept only
one-third more time than was regular with him. And this has been the
experience over and over again of men in active life who have been obliged
to keep awake for long periods by the absolute necessities of the
situation in which they have been placed.
In this fact
there is surely another hint of the sublimation of the time sense during
sleep. While it would be an unwarrantable assumption to suppose that the
period of recuperation by sleep must be as long, or nearly as long, as the
period of deprivation, the ratio between the two presents a discrepancy so
great that it would seem as though this might be due to an acceleration of
the time element of consciousness.
THE EASTERN
TEACHING IN REGARD TO SLEEP AND DREAMS
In this matter of
the wonder, the mystery, the enchantment, of sleep and dreams, the most
modern psychology and the most ancient wisdom meet on common ground.
Eastern wisdom casts such a light upon the problems of subjectivity that
it should not be lightly dismissed. For uncounted centuries Hindu-Aryan
spiritual science has recognized, not one plane or condition of
consciousness, but three; waking, dreaming, and deep sleep—the gross, the
subtle and the pure. In the waking state—that is, with the vehicle attuned
to vibrate to materiality—the individual self is as a captive in a citadel
of flesh, aware of only so much of the universal life as chances to enact
itself before the windows of his prison. In the dream state, when the more
violent vibrations of the body are stilled in sleep, consciousness becomes
active in its subtle (four-dimensional) vehicle, and ranges free
throughout the ampler spaces of this subtler world. In deep sleep,
consciousness reverts to its pure condition—the individual self becomes
the All-Self: the rainbow, no longer prismatic by reason of its refraction
in materiality, becomes the pure white light; the melody of life resolves
itself into the primordial harmony; sequence becomes simultaneity, and
Time, no longer “besprent with seven-hued circumstance,” is swallowed up
in duration.
“There are two
paths for him, within and without, and they both turn back in a day and a
night.... After having subdued by sleep all that belongs to the body, he,
not asleep himself, looks down upon the sleeping. Having assumed light, he
goes again to his place, the golden person, the lonely bird”
UPANISHADS.
SPACE IN DREAMS
However
preposterous may appear to us this notion that the waking state, in which
we feel ourselves most potent and alive, is really one of inhibition—that
the world is only a “shoal of time”—it is curiously borne out by the
baffling phenomena of dreams and is in perfect accord with the Higher
Space Hypothesis. The possibility of shaking off the grip of sleep under
appropriate circumstances, the fact that we can watch in our sleep, and
awake at the right moment, that we can sleep and still watch and keep
awake in regard to special objects and particular persons—these things
form insuperable difficulties for all those plausible, and apparently
scientific, theories of sleep current in the West; but they fit perfectly
with the Eastern idea that “he, not asleep himself, looks down upon the
sleeping.” And to the questions, “How, and from whence?” in the light of
our hypothesis we may answer, “By the curvature of time, consciousness
escapes into the fourth dimension.”
Myers shows that
he was in need of just this clue in order to account for some of the dream
experiences recorded in Human Personality, since he asks for “an
intermediate conception of space—something between space as we know it in
the material world and space as we imagine it to disappear in the ideal
world.” He suggests that in dreams and trance there may be a clearer and
more complete perception of space than is at present possible to us. A
corresponding sublimation of the time sense is no less necessary to
account for time in dreams. Although we seem to triumph over space and
time to such a tune as to eliminate them, dream experiences have both form
and sequence. Now because form presupposes space, and time is implicit in
sequence, there arises the necessity for that “intermediate conception" of
both space and time provided by our hypothesis.
THE PHENOMENON OF
PAUSE
Let us conceive
of sleep less narrowly than we are accustomed to: think of it only as one
phase of the phenomenon of pause, of arrested physical activity, universal
throughout nature. The cell itself experiences fatigue and goes to
sleep—“perchance to dream,” Modern experimental science in the domain of
physiology and psychology proves that we see and do not see, hear and do
not hear, feel and do not feel, in successive instants. We are asleep, in
other words, not merely hour by hour, but moment by moment—and perhaps age
by age as well.
Where is
consciousness during these intervals, long or short, when the senses fail
to respond to the stimuli of the external world? It is somewhere else,
awake to some other environment. Though we may not be able to verify this
from our own experience, there are methods whereby it can be verified.
Clairvoyance is one of these, hypnotism is another—that kind of hypnotism
whereby an entranced person is made to give a report of his excursions and
adventures in the mysterious House of Sleep. It is a well-known fact that
these experiences increase in intensity, coherence and in a certain sort
of omniscience, directly in proportion to the depth of the trance. The
revelations obtained in this way are sometimes amazing. The inherent
defect of this method of obtaining information is the possibility of
deception, and for that reason science still looks askance at all evidence
drawn from this source. But in essaying to write a book about the fourth
dimension from any aspect but the mathematical, the author has put himself
outside the pale of orthodox science, so he is under no compulsion to
ignore a field so rich merely because it appears to be tainted by a
certain amount of fallibility and is even under suspicion of fraud.
Diseased oysters, though not edible, produce pearls, and a pearl of great
price is the object of this quest. Let us glance, therefore, at the
findings of hypnotism and kindred phenomena.
THE FIELD OF
PSYCHIC RESEARCH
It is difficult
to divest the words hypnotism and clairvoyance of certain sordid and
sinister associations. We are apt to think of them only as urban flora of
the dust and dark, cultivated for profit by itinerant professors and
untidy sibyls. Larger knowledge of the night side of human nature,
however, profoundly modifies this view. The invoked image is then of some
hushed and studious chamber where a little group of people sit attentive
to the voice of one entranced—listeners at the keyhole of the door to
another world. This “news from nowhere,” garnered under so-called test
conditions and faithfully recorded, has grown by now to a considerable
literature, accessible to all—one with which every well-informed person is
assumed to have at least a passing acquaintance.
A marked and
constant characteristic of trance phenomena consists of an apparent
confusion between past, present and future. As in the game of three-card
monte, it appears impossible to tell in what order the three will turn up—was,
is and will be, lose their special significance. Clairvoyance,
in its time aspect, whether spontaneous, hypnotically induced, or
self-induced, is susceptible of classification as post-vision, present
vision, and prevision. Post-vision is that in which past events are not
recollected merely, but seen or experienced. It is the past become
present. Present vision is clairvoyance of things transpiring elsewhere;
the present, remote in space, but not in time. Prevision is the future in
the present. These various orders of clear-seeing transcend the
limits of the actual knowledge and experience of the seer. This
classification and these definitions are important only to us, to whom
past, present, and future stand sharply differentiated in thought and in
experience; not to the clairvoyant, who, though bound in body to our space
and time, is consciously free in a world where these discriminations
vanish. Why do they vanish? This question can best be answered by means of
a homely analogy.
For a symbol of
the flow of time in waking consciousness, imagine yourself in a railway
carriage which jogs along a main-travelled line at a rate predetermined by
the time-table. You approach, reach and pass such stations as are
intersected by that particular railway, and you get a view of the
landscape which every other traveler shares. Having once left a station,
you cannot go back to it, nor can you arrive at places further along the
line before the train itself takes you there. Compare this with the
freedom to do either of these things, and any number of others, if you
suddenly change from the train to an automobile. Then, in effect, you have
the freedom of a new dimension. In the one case, you must travel along a
single line at a uniform rate; in the other, you are able to strike out in
any direction and regulate your speed at will. You can go back to a place
after the train has left it; you can go forward to some place ahead,
before the train arrives, or you can strike out into, and traverse, new
country. In short, your freedom, temporal and spatial, will be related to
that of the train-bound traveler, somewhat as is trance consciousness to
everyday waking life.
MODIFYING THE
PAST
Modern psychology
has demonstrated the existence of a great undercurrent of mental and
emotional life, transcending the individual's conscious experience, in
which the most complex processes are carried on without the individual's
conscious participation. The clearest symbol by which this fact may be
figured to the imagination is the one already presented: the comparison of
the subjective field to a plane, in which the conscious experience of the
individual is represented by a single line. In sleep and trance we have an
augmented freedom of movement and so are able to travel here and there,
backward and forward, not only among our own “disassociated memories” but
in that greater and more mysterious demesne which comprehends what we call
the future, as well as the present and the past.
The profound
significance of the disassociation and sublimation of memory by hypnotism,
or by whatever other means the train of personal experience and
recollection can be thrown off the track, appears to have been ignored on
its theoretical side—that is, as establishing the return of time. It has
cleverly been turned to practical account, however, in the treatment of
disease. By a series of painstaking and brilliant experiments, the
demonstration of the role played by “disassociated memories” in causing
certain functional nervous and mental troubles has been achieved. It has
been shown that severe emotional shocks, frights, griefs, worries, may
be—and frequently are—completely effaced from conscious recollection,
while continuing to be vividly remembered in the depths of the
subconscious. It has been shown that thence they may, and frequently do,
exercise a baleful effect upon the whole organism, giving rise to disease
symptoms, the particular type of which were determined by the victim's
self-suggestion. As a preliminary to effecting a permanent cure to such
disorders, it is necessary to get at these disassociated memories and drag
them back into the full light of conscious recollection. To get at them,
medical psychologists make use of hypnotism, automatic writing,
crystal-gazing—in short, of any method which will force an entrance into
that higher time-world, whereby the forgotten past may become the present.
This accomplished, and the crucial moment recovered and transfixed, the
victim of the aborted opportunity is led to deal with it as one may deal
with the fluid, and may not deal with the fixed. Again his past is plastic
to the operation of his intelligence and his will. Here is glad news for
mortals: the past recoverable and in a manner revocable!
Buddha taught
that all sin is ignorance, and this teaching has escaped oblivion because
its truth has echoed in so many human hearts. We find that it is possible
to deal with our old ignorances in the light of later knowledge. What is
this but the self-forgiveness of sins? Subconsciously we may be always at
work, mending the past. Repentance is the conscious recognition of some
culmination of this obscure process, when the heart is suffused with the
inner gladness of liberation from the payment of old karmic debts.
Christ's words, “Thy sins are forgiven,” spoken to the woman who washed
his feet with her tears, sanctions this idea—that the past is remediable
by knowledge and by love.
Conceding this
much, we must equally admit the possibility of moulding the future, of
adjusting the will to the event which shall befall. If the present moment
can again intersect the stream of past conscious experience, it may
equally do so with regard to the future. This brings up the tremendous
questions of free-will and fore-ordination. Upon these the Oriental
doctrines of karma and reincarnation cast the only light by which the
reason consents to be guided. As these doctrines are intimately related
both to higher time and to trance revelations, some consideration of karma
and reincarnation may appropriately find place here.
KARMA AND
REINCARNATION
Karma is that
self-adjusting force in human affairs which restores harmony disturbed by
action. It is the moral law of compensation, and by its operation produces
all conditions of life, misery and happiness, birth, death, and re-birth;
itself being both the cause and the effect of action. Its operation is
indicated in the phrase, “Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also
reap.”
The essential
idea of reincarnation is indicated in the following quotation from the
Upanishads: “And as a goldsmith, taking a piece of gold, turns it into
another, newer, and more beautiful shape, so does this Self, having thrown
off this body and dispelled all ignorance, make unto himself another and
more beautiful shape.”
Reincarnation is
the periodic “dip” of an immortal individual into materiality for the
working out of karma, after an interval, long or short, spent under other
conditions of existence. These alternations constitute the broader and
deeper diapason of human life, of which the change from waking to sleeping
represents the lesser, and the momentary awareness and unawareness of the
sense mechanism to stimulation, the least.
Thus a physical
incarnation, in the broadest sense of the term, is the interval, long or
short, of the immersion of consciousness in materiality. Under fatigue,
the cell life withdraws; that is, it ceases to respond to physical
stimuli, and so passes out of incarnation. When this occurs en masse
there transpires that hiatus of the personal consciousness called sleep,
and while sleep lasts the personality is out of incarnation. After
death—in the interval between one life and the next—the specific memories
of the personality fade out as in sleep, or rather, become latent, leaving
the soul, the permanent life-center, clear and colorless, a mysterious
focus of spiritual forces and affinities (the seeds of karma) ready for
another sowing in the world of men. This center of consciousness is
thereupon drawn to the newly forming body, the life environment of which
will rightly and justly—perhaps retributively—bring the tendencies and
characteristics of the conscious center into objectivity again. Character
is destiny, and character is self-created. “All that we are is the result
of what we have thought.” But in the vast complexity and volume of human
life there is a constant production of forms, with all the varieties of
characteristics and capacities requisite to meet the needs of every soul,
thirsty for the destiny that awaits it; and here heredity plays its part.
Beyond the individual soul is the world-soul, which periodically
incarnates in the humanity of a planet, and beyond the worlds of a single
system, suns and congeries of suns.
The profound and
pregnant doctrines of karma and reincarnation, here so sketchily outlined,
are but expansions of one of the fundamental propositions of all Eastern
philosophical systems, that the effect is the unfolding of the cause in
time.
To omit a
consideration of karma and reincarnation in connection with higher time
would be to force a passage and then not follow where it leads. The idea
of time curvature is implicit in the ideas of karma and reincarnation. For
what is karma but the return of time, the flowering in the present of some
seed sown elsewhere and long ago? And what is reincarnation but the major
cycle of that sweep into objective existence and out again, of which the
alternation between waking and sleeping is the lesser counterpart?
COLONEL DE
ROCHAS' EXPERIMENTS
During the past
few years evidence has been accumulating that we never really forget
anything. We have rediscovered the memory of the subconscious mind. It is
generally known that in the mesmeric or somnambulistic sleep things
hopelessly beyond recall for the habitual mind come to the surface, in
fragments, or in whole series, as the case may be. It is perhaps news to
some readers, however, that the memory of past lives has been recovered in
this way. This but confirms the Eastern secret teaching that could we
remember our dream experiences we should recover the knowledge of our past
incarnations.
Among the
achievements of Eastern hypnotism is the recovery of the memory of past
births. Colonel de Rochas appears to have paralleled this achievement in
the West. Certain of his experiments have been admirably reported by
Maurice Maeterlinck in the eighth chapter of Our Eternity.
Maeterlinck's account, somewhat condensed, is given here, because it so
well illustrates the liberation of consciousness from the tyranny of time
as we conceive it. He says:
“First of all, it
is only right to say that Colonel de Rochas is a savant who seeks nothing
but objective truth and does so with a scientific strictness and integrity
that have never been questioned. He puts certain exceptional subjects into
a hypnotic sleep and, by means of downward passes, makes them trace back
the whole course of their existence. He thus takes them successively to
their youth, their adolescence and down to the extreme limits of their
childhood. At each of these hypnotic stages, the subject reassumes the
consciousness, the character and the state of mind which he possessed at
the corresponding stage in his life. He goes over the same events, with
their joys and their sorrows. If he has been ill, he once more passes
through his illness, his convalescence and his recovery.
“Let us, to come
to details, take one of the simplest cases. The subject is a girl of
eighteen, called Josephine. She lives at Voiron, in the department of
Isere. By means of downward passes she is brought back to the condition of
a baby at its mother's breast The passes continue and the wonder-tale runs
its course. Josephine can no longer speak; and we have the great silence
of infancy, which seems to be followed by a silence more mysterious still.
Josephine no longer answers except by signs: she is not yet born.
'She is floating in darkness.' They persist; the sleep becomes heavier;
and suddenly, from the depths of that sleep, rises the voice of another
being, a voice unexpected and unknown, the voice of a churlish,
distrustful and discontented old man. They question him. At first he
refuses to answer, saying that 'of course he's there, and he's speaking;'
that 'he sees nothing;' and 'he's in the dark.' They increase the number
of passes and gradually gain his confidence. His name is Jean Claude
Bourdon; he is an old man; he has long been ailing and bedridden. He tells
the story of his life. He was born at Champvent, in the parish of Polliat,
in 1812. He went to school until he was eighteen and served his time in
the army with the Seventh Artillery at Besancon; and he describes his gay
time there, while the sleeping girl makes gestures of twirling an
imaginary moustache. When he goes back to his native place, he does not
marry, but he has a mistress. He leads a solitary life (I omit all but the
essential facts), and dies at the age of seventy, after a long illness.
“We now hear the
dead man speak; and his posthumous revelations are not sensational, which,
however, is not an adequate reason for doubting their genuineness. He
feels himself growing out of his body; but he remains attached to it for a
fairly long time. His fluidic body, which is at first diffused, takes a
more concentrated form. He lives in darkness, which he finds disagreeable;
but he does not suffer. At last, the night in which he is plunged is
streaked with a few flashes of light. The idea comes to reincarnate
himself and he draws near to her who is to be his mother (that is, the
mother of Josephine). He encircles her until the child is born, whereupon
he gradually enters the child's body. Until about the seventh year, his
body is surrounded by a sort of floating mist, in which he used to see
many things which he has not seen since.
“The next thing
to be done is to go back beyond Jean Claude. A mesmerization lasting
nearly three-quarters of an hour, without lingering at any intermediate
stage, brings the old man back to babyhood. A fresh silence, a new limbo;
and then, suddenly, another voice and an unexpected individual. This time
it is an old woman who has been very wicked; and so she is in great
torment (she is dead, at the actual instant; for, in this inverted world,
lives go backward and of course begin at the end). She is in deep
darkness, surrounded by evil spirits. She speaks at first in a faint
voice, but always gives definite replies to the questions put to her,
instead of cavilling at every moment, as Jean Claude did. Her name is
Philomene Carteron.
“'By intensifying
the sleep,' adds Colonel de Rochas, whom I will now quote, 'I induce the
manifestations of a living Philomene. She no longer suffers, seems very
calm and always answers coldly and distinctly. She knows that she is
unpopular in the neighborhood, but no one is a penny the worse and she
will be even with them yet. She was born in 1702; her maiden name was
Philomene Cherpigny; her grandfather on the mother's side was called
Pierre Machon and lived in Ozan. In 1732 she married, at Chevroux, a man
named Carterton, by whom she had two children, both of whom she lost.'“
Before her
incarnation, Philomene had been a little girl who died in infancy.
Previous to that, she was a man who committed murder, and it was to
expiate this crime that she endured such suffering in the darkness, and
after her life as a little girl, when she had no time to do wrong. Colonel
de Rochas did not think it wise to carry the hypnosis further, because the
subject appeared exhausted and her paroxysms were painful to watch. He
obtained analogous and even more surprising results with other subjects.
Maeterlinck's
comments upon all this are of negligible value. He pays a fine tribute to
the theory of reincarnation. “There was never a more beautiful, a juster,
a purer, a more moral, fruitful and probable creed,” he says: yet for all
that, it is clear that he has not been at pains fully to inform himself of
the Eastern teaching.
Colonel de
Rochas' success, and that of all other experimenters along these lines, is
due to their unconscious following of the Eastern method. He himself says
that he “avoided everything that should put the subject on a definite
tack,”—that is, he refrained from voluntary suggestion.
Having referred
so frequently and so familiarly to the Eastern belief in reincarnation,
and hinted at a more solid foundation for that belief than the single
series of experiments above referred to, it would be unfair to the reader
not to gratify his curiosity more fully in regard to these matters. In the
light of our hypothesis they take on an importance which justifies their
further consideration here.
ORIENTAL PHYSICS
AND METAPHYSICS
Western physical
science, pursued with ardor and devotion for the past hundred years, has
attained to a control over physical phenomena little short of magical, but
in our understanding and mastery of subjective phenomena we are far behind
those Eastern peoples who have made these matters the subject of study and
experiment for thousands of years. The informed Hindu, rightly or wrongly,
regards the Western practice of hypnotism, both in its methods and in its
results, with mingled horror and contempt. To him it is not different from
Black Magic, pernicious to operator and subject alike, since it involves
an unwarrantable tyranny of the will on the part of the operator, and a
dangerous submission to the obsession of an invading will on the part of
the subject. Eastern hypnotism—at its highest and best—is profoundly
different from Western, in that the sanctity of the individual is
respected. Its aim is not to enslave the will, but temporarily to
emancipate consciousness, under favorable circumstances, from its physical
limitation.
Eastern practical
psychology and metaphysics can be understood only through a knowledge of
Eastern physics. These we would call transcendental, since they recognize
not one theatre of consciousness, but three: the gross, the subtle, and
the pure. These correspond to the material, the etherial, and the empyreal
worlds of Greek philosophy, and to the physical, astral, and mental planes
of modern Theosophy. They may be thought of as universal substance in
three different octaves of vibration. Upon this, the trained will of man
is able to act directly, for the reason that—as claimed by Balzac—it is a
living force.
In Eastern
hypnotism the gross vibrations of the physical vehicle are inhibited by
the will of the operator, putting the body of the subject to sleep,
whereat the consciousness, free in its subtle body, awakens to a
dimensionally higher world. The operator, by means of questions, reaps
such profit as he may by following the “true dreams" of the entranced
subject, scrupulously refraining from imposing his own will further than
is necessary to obtain the information which he seeks. The higher power of
Eastern hypnotism, totally unknown in the West, consists of inhibiting the
subtle vibrations of the astral vehicle also, permitting the consciousness
to revert to its “pure" condition. In these deep states of trance the
subject is able to communicate knowledges shut away from the generality of
men—among them the knowledge of past births.
THE
SELF-RECOVERED MEMORY OF PAST BIRTHS
The strength of
will necessary to accomplish this higher power of hypnotism is achieved by
arduous and long-continued exercises in concentration, by the practice of
a strict morality, and by submission to a physical regimen which few
Occidentals would care to undergo. Severe as is this training, it is less
so than that which the true Yogi imposes upon himself, and its fruits are
less. The achievement to which he addresses himself is far beyond that of
the most accomplished hypnotist. The Yogi scorns all supernormal powers,
even while possessing them. The Yogi, as the word implies—it means
literally union—seeks to unite himself with his own higher self, the
eternal and immortal part of his own nature, and the achievement of this
brings with it the freedom of the three worlds at all times, and in full
consciousness. As this involves an inward turning of the mind and will,
and the withdrawal from the ordinary active life of average humanity, he
alone is witness of his own success. “The rest is silence.”
The knowledge of
past births which may be obtained by the questionable and cumbersome
method of hypnotism is one of the wayside flowers which the Yogi may
pluck, if he will, on his path towards perfection. There are definite
rules for the attainment of this knowledge, and they conform so closely to
Colonel de Rochas' method—save for the fact that operator and subject are
one and not twain—that it will be interesting to give them here. The
ensuing passage is from the Vishuddhi Marga, or Path of Purity,
a work written some sixteen hundred years ago by the famous sage,
Buddhaghosha, whose name signifies the Voice of Buddha, the revealer of
Buddha's teachings. It is quoted in Charles Johnston's The Memory of
Past Births.
“The devotee,
then, who tries for the first time to call to mind former states of
existence, should choose a time after breakfast, when he has returned from
collecting alms, and is alone and plunged in meditation, and has been
absorbed in the four trances in succession. On rising from the fourth
trance, which leads to the higher powers, he should consider the event
which last took place, namely, his sitting down; next, the spreading of
the mat; the entering of the room; the putting away of bowl and robe; his
eating; his leaving the village; his going the rounds of the village for
alms; his entering the village for alms; his departure from the monastery;
his offering adoration in the courts of the shrine and of the Bodhi tree;
his washing the bowl; what he did between taking the bowl and rinsing his
mouth; what he did at dawn; what he did in the middle watch of the night;
what he did in the first watch of the night. Thus he must consider what he
did for a whole day and night, going backwards over it in reverse order.
“In the same
reverse order he must consider what he did the day before, the day before
that, up to the fifth day, the tenth day, a fortnight ago, a month ago, a
year ago; and having in the same manner considered the previous ten and
twenty years, and so on up to the time of his conception in this birth, he
must then consider the name and form which he had at the moment of death
in his last birth. But since the name and form of the last birth came
quite to an end, and were replaced by others, this point of time is like
thick darkness, and difficult to be made out by the mind of any person
still deluded. But even such a one should not despair nor say: 'I shall
never be able to penetrate beyond conception, or take as the object of my
thought the name and form which I had in my last birth, at the moment of
death,' but he should again and again enter the trance which leads to the
higher powers, and each time he rises from the trance, he should again
intend his mind upon that point of time.
“Just as a strong
man in cutting down a mighty tree to be used as the peaked roof of a
pagoda, if the edge of his axe be turned in lopping off the branches and
twigs, will not despair of cutting down the tree, but will go to an
iron-worker's shop, have his axe sharpened, return, and go on with his
cutting; and if the edge of his axe be turned a second time, he will a
second time have it sharpened, and return, and go on with his cutting; and
since nothing that he chopped once needs to be chopped again, he will in
no long time, when there is nothing left to chop, fell that mighty tree.
In the same way the devotee rising from the trance which leads to the
higher powers, without considering what he has considered once, and
considering only the moment of conception, in no long time will penetrate
beyond the moment of conception, and take as his object the name and form
which he had at the moment of death, in his last birth.
“His alert
attention having become possessed of this knowledge, he can call to mind
many former states of existence, as, one birth, two births, three births,
four births, five births, and so on, in the words of the text.”
This quotation
casts an interesting light upon Eastern monasticism. The Buddhist
monasteries are here revealed as schools of practical psychology, the life
of the monk a life of arduous and unceasing labor, but labor of a sort
which seems but idleness. The successive “initiations” which are the
milestones on the “Path of Perfection” upon which the devotee has set his
feet represent successive emancipations of consciousness gained through
work and knowledge. Their nature may best be understood by means of a
fanciful analogy.
RELEASE
If we assume that
all life is conscious life, as much aware of its environment as the
freedom of movement of its life vehicle in that environment permits, a
corpuscle vibrating in a solid would have a certain sense of space and of
movement in space gained from its own experience. Now imagine the solid,
which is its world, to be subjected to the influence of heat. When the
temperature reached a certain point the solid would transform itself into
a liquid. To the corpuscle all the old barriers would seem to be broken
down; space would be different, time would be different, and its world a
different place. Again, at another increase of temperature, when the
liquid became a gas, the corpuscle would experience a further
emancipation: it would possess a further freedom, with all the facts of
its universe to learn anew.
Each of these
successive crises would constitute for it an initiation, and since the
heat has acted upon it from within, causing an expansion of its life
vehicle, it would seem to itself to have attained to these new freedoms
through self-development.
The parallel is
now plain to the reader: the corpuscle is the Yogi, bent on liberation:
the heat which warms him is the Divine Love, centered in his heart, his
initiations are the successive emancipations into higher and higher
spaces, till he attains Nirvana—inherits the kingdom prepared for him from
the foundation of the world. As latent heat resides in the corpuscle, so
is Release hidden in the heart—release from time and space. The
perception of this prompted the exultant apostrophe of Buddha, “Looking
for the maker of this tabernacle, I have run through a course of many
births, not finding him; and painful is birth again and again. But now,
maker of the tabernacle, thou hast been seen; thou shalt not make up this
tabernacle again. All thy rafters are broken, thy ridge-pole is sundered;
the mind, approaching the Eternal, has attained the extinction of all
desires.”
Upon the mystery
of Nirvana the Higher Space Hypothesis casts not a little light. To
“approach the Eternal” can only be to approach a condition where time is
not. Because there is an escape from time in proportion as space
dimensions are added to, and assimilated by, consciousness, any
development involving this element of space conquest (and evolution is
itself such a development) involves time annihilation also. To be in a
state of desire is to be conditioned by a limitation, because one can
desire only that which one has not or is not. The extinction of a desire
is only another name for the transcending of a limitation—of all desires,
of all limitations. If these limitations are of space they are of time
also; therefore is the “approach to the Eternal” through the “extinction
of all desire.” Christ said, “Him that overcometh will I make a pillar of
the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out”—go out, that is, into
incarnation—into “time, besprent with seven-hued circumstance.”
Such are the
testimonies of the world-saviors regarding the means and end of
liberation. Below them on the evolutionary ladder stand the mystics,
earth-bound, but soul-free; below them, in turn, yet far above common
humanity, stand the men of genius, caught still in the net of passion, but
able, in their work, to reflect something of the glory of the supernal
world. Let us consider, in the next two chapters, each of these in turn. |