What Is Spiritualism?
By common consent Modern Spiritualism
dates from the 31st of March, 1848. It was then that questions were
first asked and intelligent answers given by means of rappings. The Fox
family living in an humble house in the obscure village of
Hydesville, N. Y., had been disturbed by strange noises for successive nights, but
on the evening of the 31st, after they had retired, the disturbances
became excessively annoying. At length it was found by the children that
the sounds would respond to their request. This was a new order of
things, for ghosts usually stand and silently gaze on
the beholder, and disappear at the
first word addressed to them.
The anniversary which is now
celebrated by Spiritualists throughout the world, was first suggested by
Mr. James Lawrence, of Cleveland, Ohio, who received
a communication purporting to come from a spirit once eminent in earth
life, suggesting that the day be thus set apart. The following year,
1870, the anniversary was almost universally observed by the societies
of the city and country.
A. J. Davis may be said to have been
the John the Baptist of Spiritualism, having prophesied its coming in
his "Nature's Divine Revelations," which was finished one year before
the Hydesville manifestations.
Of the many so-called exposures, and
theories explaining the phenomena, they have only exposed the ignorance
of those who have put them forth. The most acute and vigilant committee,
after thorough investigation pronounced the phenomena occurring in the
presence of the Fox children to be independent of them, and from that
day to the present every one who has honestly and patiently
investigated, has become convinced of the genuineness of the
manifestations.
Such was the beginning of what has
been called "Modern Spiritualism," as distinguished from "Spiritualism,"
which is as old as the race. It marks an epoch in time and the
commencement of a reaction against materialism, which, with the new
phase of scientific thought, was
sweeping away the old beliefs in the
supernatural.
What is Spiritualism? It is a
religion and a science. Science the classification of facts, the
co-ordination of cause and effect, ultimating in broad generalizations.
It is the search after truth. Religion is devotion to and for the truth
for its own sake; the abnegation of self for the good of others.
Spiritualism, spanning the gulf between this present and the future
life, is a religion dominant in both. It forms the golden strands
permeating through all
religious systems and binding them with common bonds. You
may take the sacred books of the
world—Shasta, Zend Avesta, the Kings,
Koran, Talmud, and the Old and New
Testaments—and you have brought together the spiritual history, ideas,
emotions, superstitions and spiritual life of the early ages of man; but
you have not Spiritualism—you have only a part. You may take the
sciences—the terrestrial intimately connected with our telluric domain,
teaching the construction and
organization of our globe—and the
cosmical, treating of the infinite realm
of the stars—and you have not
Spiritualism; you have only part. To represent it in its completeness,
the truth must be extracted from all sciences and religions, and blended
into harmony. It takes man by the hand and assures him that he is heir
of immortal life; owning all things, for whom all things exist, and
capable of understanding all. He is for eternity.
What a position he occupies! On one
hand are the lower forms of nature,
the brutes of the field; on the other
the angels of light, towards whom he is hastening, one of whom he will
become after death casts from his spirit its earthly garments. The end and aim
of evolution is the individualization of a spiritual being. As man is
the greatest fact of nature, so individualized
spirit is the greatest fact of man.
The travail of the ages—as bringing forth
higher and higher forms, prophesying
even from the Silurian mollusk the coming of man—in this light have a
meaning; while they have not, if death is the end, bringing to naught
the accumulated fruitage of life's vast tree. Spiritualism is
leaderless. It is a singularity of the Spiritual movement that it has
spread with a rapidity unparalleled in the history of any other cause,
yet no one has stood at the head of its believers to direct their
movements. Its teachings, on the contrary, denounce leadership, the
worship of the individual, and demand every believer to rely solely on
himself. It is a great, universal movement diffused throughout all ranks
and classes of society, and
from myriad sources the little streams flow into
its vast channel. Other systems have
had great and talented men to present
and vindicate their claims to the
world; they have had leaders who were considered infallible; but
Spiritualism has none. It has never had. No
leader, no pope, no final appeal;
every one working out his own salvation;
every one his own high priest.
The objections urged against
Spiritualism are generally based on manifestations which Spiritualists
themselves reject or hold as of questionable value. Dark circles are
ridiculed and excite skepticism. Unless such circles are held under
strictly test conditions they are of doubtful value. The mediums who
hold them may be honest, but the darkness casts a shadow over the most
genuine manifestations. These manifestations have occurred in the light,
and hence darkness is not absolutely essential. Every honest medium, as a safeguard, should demand
such conditions as will give
value as tests to whatever may occur in the seances.
Our facts now may be divided into two
distinct classes—physical and psychic—the first embracing those relating
to the moving of matter, the second to those influencing the mind.
When proved genuine, those of the
first class are far the most valuable as evidence to those trained in
the material school of thought. If it can be proved that matter has been
moved without physical contact, that the
movements were intelligent, and the
intelligence is identified, the chain of
proof is complete. The mental
phenomena depend on the impressibility of the mind; and, until more is
known of their conditions and laws, the
evidences drawn therefrom must be
taken with reservation. The moving of
physical objects without mortal
contact, in an intelligent manner, and the concussions or raps, must be
accepted as of great importance as scientific evidence. If several
witnesses of veracity agree in their statement, it is morally certain
that they speak the truth. No judge would set aside
evidence on the ground that the
organs of sight and hearing were not to be
depended on. Where thousands of
reliable witnesses testify that they have seen objects moved without
human contact, the probabilities are infinite that they have. That a
thousand individuals have not seen a table move or
heard a rap does not invalidate the
testimony of one who has. Besides, if a
score of persons subject to illusions
or hallucinations were in a circle, no two would be affected alike.
The tree is known by its fruit.
Spiritualism teaches a faultless code of morality.
Electricity, magnetism, od force,
have in turn been called to explain the phenomena. It sounds exceedingly
learned to refer unexplained phenomena to these forces, and has become
quite the fashion. But it must be remembered that the human body cannot
charge a table electrically or magnetically, and to the most sensitive
test the moving table does not
show the least indication of the
presence of these forces.
Scientific men have not met the
subject with the courtesy they give to all other fields of thought. When
Robert Hare attempted to introduce it to the attention of the American
Association, Prof. Henry so far forget the
rules of ordinary politeness as to
interrupt him in the midst of his reading,
and remarked, it "was a dangerous
subject to introduce into the convention," and moved it be laid on the table. And yet Prof. Hare was
acknowledged the peer of any member of the association in scientific
culture!
In the celebrated investigation by
the Cambridge committee, the conduct of the members was such as to make it impossible
to obtain manifestations. In each of their favorite sciences, these
professors would hasten to comply with conditions required, nor expect
success unless they did so; but here they persistently destroyed the
most essential elements, and then heralded their want of success as
evidence of the fallacy of Spiritualism.
It appears untimely for the
oft-repeated assertion that men of thought
stand aloof, when such eminent scientists as Profs. Hare, Mapes, Crookes,
Wallace, Varley, Butterof,
Barrett, James, Wagner, and scores of others publicly announce their
acceptance. All of these, in the words of Judge Edmunds, speaking of
himself, "went into the investigation originally thinking it a
deception, and intending to make public my exposure of it. Having from
my research come to a different conclusion, I feel that the
obligation to make known the result
is just as strong."
A report by Gen. Bullard of a seance
held with a little daughter of Mr. Alwood, of Troy, N. Y., is of
peculiar interest. He was induced to attend by a clergyman, and the
party was joined by four other eminent men. While the little girl sat in
her high chair, her tiny feet resting on the
footboard, she was lifted and carried
about as a feather blown by the wind.
The heavy table, around which we were
seated rocked, while loud raps resounded from various parts of the room,
and spelled out names and dates and messages identifying departed friends of the sitters. And as
they were about to adjourn a
message was given from Gen. Bullard's deceased brother. Then he thought
as a test, "If it is my brother, move the medium in her chair toward
me." His idea was to have her moved a little way; but she was carried
around the table and sat by his side almost instantaneously. Then Gen.
Bullard started up, exclaiming: "By heavens, it is all true!"
In contrast with the "exposition" of
Faraday, and Huxley, who, when he saw a table move, and
was asked if it really did, guardedly replied: "It seems to move," are
the researches of Prof. Crookes, Varley and Wallace extending through
many years, their adhesion to the cause constantly and the voluminous
investigations increasing, a of the English Society of Psychic Research.
Judge Edmunds says: "Preparatory to
visiting a circle I have sat down alone in my room and carefully
prepared a series of questions to be propounded, and I have been
surprised to have my questions answered, and in the precise order in
which I made them without my even taking my memorandum out of my pocket,
and when I knew not a person present
even knew I had prepared the
questions, much less what they were. * * * I
have heard the mediums use Greek,
Latin, Spanish and French words, when I knew that they had no knowledge
of any language but their own, and it is a fact that can be attested to
by many, that often there has been speaking and writing in foreign
languages and unknown tongues by those who were unaccustomed with
either."
Judge Edmunds further says: "When I
was absent in Central America my friends in turn heard of my whereabouts
and of the state of my health seven times, and on my return, by
comparing their information with the
entries in my journal, it was found
to be invariably correct."
The facts I have stated not only
indicate intelligence, but identify that intelligence. If a friend
should come to our door and rap, if we could not open it or in any way
see him; if he could not speak, but only answer by raps, how could we
identify him? We would not begin to cavil and prate
about the unknown laws of mind, but
simply ask such questions as he only
could answer, and, if rightly
responded to, we should believe that he was present. In this manner do
our spirit friends come to us. If I hear rappings on the table, or it is
moved, and, by the alphabet, the name of a departed
friend is given, I can, by a series
of questions, establish his identity as well as I could if he were a
mortal standing outside my door.
The demonstration of the fact that we
exist as the same individuals after
death is of utmost importance. It at
once sweeps away all the dogmatism,
faith and superstitions of the past; all the vain attempts to explain
man's origin and destiny on religious
grounds, and gives in their place knowledge of the future. It brings a
balm to every mourning heart;
assurance to the doubter, and a consistent
philosophy of life.
Everyone by investigation can ascertain
the truth of Spiritualism. All are
not able through their own mediumship, because this differs in degree,
and in many is not sufficiently
developed. Why? It might as well be asked
why there is difference in sight,
hearing, and mental endowment.
|