|
Preface
IT seems rather of necessity than predilection in the sense of
apologia that I should put on record in the first place a plain
statement of my personal position, as one who for many years of literary
life has been, subject to his spiritual and other limitations, an exponent
of the higher mystic schools. It will be thought that I am acting
strangely in concerning myself at this day with what appears at first
sight and simply a well-known method of fortune-telling. Now, the opinions
of Mr. Smith, even in the literary reviews, are of no importance unless
they happen to agree with our own, but in order to sanctify this doctrine
we must take care that our opinions, and the subjects out of which they
arise, are concerned only with the highest. Yet it is just this which may
seem doubtful, in the present instance, not only to Mr. Smith, whom I
respect within the proper measures of detachment, but to some of more real
consequence, seeing that their dedications are mine. To these and to any I
would say that after the most illuminated Frater Christian Rosy Cross had
beheld the Chemical Marriage in the Secret Palace of Transmutation, his
story breaks off abruptly, with an intimation that he expected next
morning to be door-keeper. After the same manner, it happens more often
than might seem likely that those who have seen the King of Heaven through
the most clearest veils of the sacraments are those who assume thereafter
the humblest offices of all about the House of God. By such simple devices
also are the Adepts and Great Masters in the secret orders distinguished
from the cohort of Neophytes as servi servorum mysterii. So also,
or in a way which is not entirely unlike, we meet with the Tarot cards at
the outermost gates--amidst the fritterings and débris of the so-called
occult arts, about which no one in their senses has suffered the smallest
deception; and yet these cards belong in themselves to another region, for
they contain a very high symbolism, which is interpreted according to the
Laws of Grace rather than by the pretexts and intuitions of that which
passes for divination. The fact that the wisdom of God is foolishness with
men does not create a presumption that the foolishness of this world makes
in any sense for Divine Wisdom; so neither the scholars in the ordinary
classes nor the pedagogues in the seats of the mighty will be quick to
perceive the likelihood or even the possibility of this proposition. The
subject has been in the hands of cartomancists as part of the
stock-in-trade of their industry; I do not seek to persuade any one
outside my own circles that this is of much or of no consequence; but on
the historical and interpretative sides it has not fared better; it has
been there in the hands of exponents who have brought it into utter
contempt for those people who possess philosophical insight or faculties
for the appreciation of evidence. It is time that it should be rescued,
and this I propose to undertake once and for all, that I may have done
with the side issues which distract from the term. As poetry is the most
beautiful expression of the things that are of all most beautiful, so is
symbolism the most catholic expression in concealment of things that are
most profound in the Sanctuary and that have not been declared outside it
with the same fulness by means of the spoken word. The justification of
the rule of silence is no part of my present concern, but I have put on
record elsewhere, and quite recently, what it is possible to say on this
subject.
The little treatise which follows is divided into three parts, in the
first of which I have dealt with the antiquities of the subject and a few
things that arise from and connect therewith. It should be understood that
it is not put forward as a contribution to the history of playing cards,
about which I know and care nothing; it is a consideration dedicated and
addressed to a certain school of occultism, more especially in France, as
to the source and centre of all the phantasmagoria which has entered into
expression during the last fifty years under the pretence of considering
Tarot cards historically. In the second part, I have dealt with the
symbolism according to some of its higher aspects, and this also serves to
introduce the complete and rectified Tarot, which is available separately,
in the form of coloured cards, the designs of which are added to the
present text in black and white. They have been prepared under my
supervision--in respect of the attributions and meanings--by a lady who
has high claims as an artist. Regarding the divinatory part, by which my
thesis is terminated, I consider it personally as a fact in the history of
the Tarot--as such, I have drawn, from all published sources, a harmony of
the meanings which have been attached to the various cards, and I have
given prominence to one method of working that has not been published
previously; having the merit of simplicity, while it is also of universal
application, it may be held to replace the cumbrous and involved systems
of the larger hand-books. |