Chapter XI. Of the Method
by which they can Inflict Every Sort of Infirmity, generally Ills of the
Graver Kind.
But there is no bodily infirmity, not even leprosy or
epilepsy, which cannot be caused by witches, with God's permission. And
this is proved by the fact that no sort of infirmity is excepted by the
Doctors. For a careful consideration of what has already been written
concerning the power of devils and the wickedness of witches will show
that this statement offers no difficulty. Nider also deals with this
subject both in his Book of Precepts and in his Formicarius,
where he asks: Whether witches can actually injure men by their
witchcraft. And the question makes no exception of any infirmity, however
incurable. And he there answers that they can do so, and proceeds to ask
in what way and by what means.
And as to the first, he answers, as has been shown in the First
Question of the First Part of this treatise. And it is proved also by S.
Isidore where he describes the operations of witches (Etym. 8, cap.
9), and says that they are called witches on account of the magnitude of
their crimes; for they disturb the elements by raising up storms with the
help of devils, they confuse the minds of men in the ways already
mentioned, by either entirely obstructing or gravely impeding the use of
their reason. He adds also that without the use of any poison, but by the
mere virulence of their incantations, they can deprive men of their lives.
It is proved also by S. Thomas in the Second Book of Sentences ,
dist. 7 and 8, and in Book IV, dist. 34, and in general all the
Theologians write that witches can with the help of the devil bring harm
upon men and their affairs in all the ways in which the devil alone can
injure or deceive, namely, in their affairs, their reputation, their body,
their reason, and their life; which means that those injuries which are
caused by the devil without any witch, can also be caused by a witch; and
even more readily so, on account of the greater offence which is given to
the Divine Majesty, as has been shown above.
In Job i and ii is found a clear case of the injury in temporal
affairs. The injury to reputation is shown in the history of the Blessed
Jerome, that the devil transformed himself into the appearance of S.
Silvanus, Bishop of Nazareth, a friend of S. Jerome. And this devil
approached a noble woman by night in her bed and began first to provoke
and entice her with lewd words, and then invited her to perform the sinful
act. And when she called out, the devil in the form of the saintly Bishop
hid under the woman's bed, and being sought for and found there, he in
lickerish language declared lyingly that he was the Bishop Silvanus. On
the morrow therefore, when the devil had disappeared, the holy man was
scandalously defamed; but his good name was cleared when the devil
confessed at the tomb of S. Jerome that he had done this in an assumed
body.
The injury to the body is shown in the case of the Blessed Job, who was
stricken by the devil with terrible sores, which are explained as a form
of leprosy. And Sigisbert and Vincent of Beauvais (Spec. Hist. XXV,
37) both tell that in the time of the Emperor Louis II, in the diocese of
Mainz, a certain devil began to thrown stones and to beat at the houses as
if with a hammer. And then by public statements, and secret insinuations,
he spread discord ad troubled the minds of many. Then he excited the anger
of all against one man, whose lodging, where he was resting, he set on
fire, and said that they were all suffering for his sins. So at last that
man had to find his lodging in the fields. And when the priests were
saying a litany on this account, the devil stoned many of the people with
stones till he hurt them to bleeding; and sometimes he would desist, and
sometimes rage; and this continued for three years, until all the houses
there were burned down.
Exampled of the injury to the use of the reason, and of the tormenting
of the inner perceptions, are seen in those possessed and frenzied men of
whom the Gospels tell. And as for death, and that they deprive some of
their lives, it is proved in Tobias vi, in the case of the seven
husbands of the virgin Sara, who were killed because of their lecherous
lust and unbridled desired for the virgin Sara, of whom they were not
worthy to be the husbands. Therefore it is concluded that both by
themselves, and all the more with the help of witches, devils can injure
men in every way without exception.
But if it is asked whether injuries of this sort are to be ascribed
rather to devils than to witches, it is answered that, when the devils
cause injuries by their own direct action, then they are principally to be
ascribed to them. But when they work through the agency of witches for the
disparagement and offending of God and the perdition of souls, knowing
that by this means God is made more angry and allows them greater power of
doing evil; and because they do indeed perpetuate countless witchcrafts
which the devil would not be allowed to bring upon men if he wished to
injure men alone by himself, but are permitted, in the just and hidden
purpose of God, through the agency of witches, on account of their perfidy
and abjuration of the Catholic Faith; therefore such injuries are justly
ascribed to witches secondarily, however much the devil may be the
principal actor.
Therefore when a woman dips a twig in water and sprinkles the water in
the air to make it rain, although she does not herself cause the rain, and
could not be blamed on that account, yet, because she has entered into a
pact with the devil by which she can do this as a witch, although it is
the devil who causes the rain, she herself nevertheless deservedly bears
the blame, because she is an infidel and does the devil's work,
surrendering herself to his service.
So also when a witch makes a waxen image or some such thing in order to
bewitch somebody; or when an image of someone appears by pouring molten
lead into water, and some injury is done upon the image, such as piercing
it or hurting it in any other way, when it is the bewitched man who is in
imagination being hurt; although the injury is actually done to the image
by some witch or some other man, and the devil in the same manner
invisibly injures the bewitched man, yet it is deservedly ascribed to the
witch. For, without her, God would never allow the devil to inflict the
injury, nor would the devil on his own account try to injure the man.
But because it has been said that in the matter of their good name the
devils can injure men on the own account and without the co-operation of
witches, there may arise a doubt whether the devils cannot also defame
honest women so that they are reputed to be witches, when they appear in
their likeness to bewitch someone; from which it would happen that such a
woman would be defamed without cause.
In answering this we must premise a few remarks. First, it has been
said that the devil can do nothing without the Divine permission, as is
shown in the First Part of this work in the last Question. It has also
been shown that God does not allow so great power of evil against the just
and those who live in grace, as against sinners; and as the devils have
more power against sinners (see the text: When a strong man armed, etc.)
so they are permitted by God to afflict them more than the just. Finally,
although they can, with God's permission, injure the just in their
affairs, their reputation, and their bodily health, yet, because they know
that this power is granted them chiefly for the increase of the merits of
the just, they are the less eager to injure them.
Therefore it can be said that in this difficulty there are several
points to be considered. First, the Divine permission. Secondly, the man
who is thought to be righteous, for they who are so reputed are not always
actually in a state of grace. Thirdly, the crime of which an innocent man
would be suspected; for that crime in its very origin exceeds all the
crimes of the world. Therefore it is to be said that it is granted that,
with God's permission, an innocent person, whether or not he is in a state
of grace, may be injured in his affairs to this particular crime and the
gravity of the accusation (for we have often quoted S. Isidore's saying
that they are called witches from the magnitude of their crimes), it can
be said that for an innocent person to be defamed by the devil in a way
that has been suggested does not seem at all possible, for many reasons.
In the first place, it is one thing to be defamed in respect of vices
which are committed without any expressed or tacit contract with the
devil, such as theft, robbery, or fornication; but quite another matter to
be defamed in respect of vices which it is impossible to accuse a man of
having perpetrated unless he has entered upon an expressed contract with
the devil; and such are the works of witches, which cannot be laid at
their door unless it is by the power of devils that they bewitch men,
animals and the fruits of the earth. Therefore, although the devil can
blacken men's reputations in respect of other vices, yet it does not seem
possible for him to do so in respect of this vice which cannot be
perpetrated without his co-operation.
Besides, it has never hitherto been known to have happened that an
innocent person has been defamed by the devil to such an extent that he
was condemned to death for this particular crime. Furthermore, when a
person is only under suspicion, he suffers no punishment except that which
the Canon prescribes for his purgation, as will be shown in the Third Part
of this work in the second method of sentencing witches.
And it is set down there that, if such a man fails in his purgation, he
is to be considered guilty, but that he should be solemnly adjured before
the punishment due to his sin is proceeded with and enforced. But here we
are dealing with actual events; and it has never yet been known that an
innocent person has been punished on suspicion of witchcraft, and there is
no doubt that God will never permit such a thing to happen.
Besides, He does not suffer the innocent who are under Angelic
protection to be suspected of smaller crimes, such as robbery and such
things; then all the more will He preserve those who are under that
protection from suspicion of the crime of witchcraft.
And it is no valid objection to quote the legend of S. Germanius, when
devils assumed the bodies of other women and sat down at table and slept
with the husbands, deluding the latter into the belief that those women
were in their own bodies eating and drinking with them, as we have
mentioned before. For the women in this case are not to be held guiltless.
For in the Canon (Episcopi 26. q. 2) such women are condemned for
thinking that they are really and actually transported, when they are so
only in imagination; although, as we have shown above, they are at times
bodily transported by devils.
But our present proposition is that they can, with God's permission,
cause all other infirmities, with no exception; and it is to be concluded
from what we have said that this is so. For no exception is made by the
Doctors, and there is no reason why there should be any, since, as we have
often said, the natural power of devils is superior to all corporeal
power. And we have found in our experience that this is true. For although
greater difficulty may be felt in believing that witches are able to cause
leprosy or epilepsy, since these diseases arise from some long-standing
physical predisposition or defect, none the less it has sometimes been
found that even these have been caused by witchcraft. For in the diocese
of Basel, in the district of Alsace and Lorraine, a certain honest
labourer spoke roughly to a certain quarrelsome woman, and she angrily
threatened him that she would soon avenge herself on him. He took little
notice of her; but on the same night he felt a pustule grow upon his neck,
and he rubbed it a little, and found his whole face and neck puffed up and
swollen, and a horrible form of leprosy appeared all over his body. He
immediately went to his friends for advice, and told them of the woman's
threat, and said that he would stake his life on the suspicion that this
had been done to him by the magic art of that same witch. In short, the
woman was taken, questioned, and confessed her crimes. But when the judge
asked her particularly about the reason for it, and how she had done it,
she answered: "When that man used abusive words to me, I was angry and
went home; and my familiar began to ask the reason for my ill humour. I
told him, and begged him to avenge me on the man. And he asked what I
wanted him to do to him; and I answered that I wished he would always have
a swollen face. And the devil went away and afflicted the man even beyond
my asking; for I had not hoped that he would infect him with such sore
leprosy." And so the woman was burned.
And in the diocese of Constance, between Breisach and Freiburg, there
is a leprous woman (unless she has paid the debt of all flesh within these
two years) who used to tell to many people how the same thing had happened
to her by reason of a similar quarrel which took place between her and
another woman. For one night when she went out of the house to do
something in front of the door, a warm wind came from the house of the
other woman, which was opposite, and suddenly struck her face; and from
that time she had been afflicted with the leprosy which she now suffered.
And lastly, in the same diocese, in the territory of the Black Forest,
a witch was being lifted by a gaoler on to the pile of wood prepared for
her burning, and she said: "I will pay you"; and blew into his face. And
he was at once afflicted with a horrible leprosy all over his body, and
did not survive many days. For the sake of brevity, the fearful crimes of
this witch, and many more instances could be recounted, are omitted. For
we have often found that certain people have been visited with epilepsy or
the falling sickness by means of eggs which have been buried with dead
bodies, especially the dead bodies of witches, together with other
ceremonies of which we cannot speak, particularly when these eggs have
been given to a person either in food or drink.
Chapter XII. Of the Way how in Particular they Afflict Men with Other
Like Infirmities.
But who can reckon the number of infirmities which they have
inflicted upon men, such as blindness, the sharpest pains, and contortions
of the body? Yet we shall set down a few examples which we have seen with
our eyes, or have been related to one of us Inquisitors.
When an inquisition was being held on some witches in the town of
Innsbruck, the following case, among others, was brought to light. A
certain honest woman who had been legally married to one of the household
of the Archduke formally deposed the following. In the time of her
maidenhood she had been in the service of one of the citizens, whose wife
became afflicted with grievous pains in the head; and a woman came who
said she could cure her, and so began certain incantations and rites which
she said would assuage the pains. And I carefully watched (said this
woman) what she did, and saw that, against the nature of water poured into
a vase, she caused water to rise in its vessel, together with other
ceremonies which there is no need to mention. And considering that the
pains in my mistress' head were not assuaged by these means, I addressed
the witch in some indignation with these words: "I do not know what you
are doing, but whatever it is, it is witchcraft, and you are doing it for
your own profit." Then the witch at once replied: "You will know in three
days whether I am a witch or not." And so it proved; for on the third day
when I sat down and took up a spindle, I suddenly felt a terrible pain in
my body. First it was inside me, so that it seemed that there was no part
of my body in which I did not feel horrible shooting pains; then it seemed
to me just as if burning coals were being continually heaped upon my head;
thirdly, from the crown of my head to the soles of my feet there was no
place large enough for a pinprick that was not covered with a rash of
white pustules; and so I remained in these pains, crying out and wishing
only for death, until the fourth day. At last my mistress' husband told me
to go to a certain tavern; and with great difficulty I went, whilst he
walked before, until we were in front of the tavern. "See!" he said to me;
"there is a loaf of white bread over the tavern door." "I see," said I.
Then he said: "Take it down, if you possibly can, for it may do you good."
And I, holding on to the door with one hand as much as I could, got hold
of the loaf with the other. "Open it" (said my master) "and look carefully
at what is inside." Then, when I had broken open the loaf, I found many
things inside it, especially some white grains very like the pustules on
my body; and I saw also some seeds and herbs such as I could not eat or
even look at, with the bones of serpents and other animals. In my
astonishment I asked my master what was to be done; and he told me to
throw it all into the fire. I did so; and behold! suddenly, not in an hour
or even a few minutes, but at the moment when that matter was thrown into
the fire, I regained all my former health.
And much more was deposed against the wife of the citizen in whose
service this woman had been, by reason of which she was not lightly but
very strongly suspected, and especially because she had used great
familiarity with known witches. It is presumed that, having knowledge of
the spell of witchcraft hidden in the loaf, she had told it to her
husband; and then, in the way described, the maid-servant recovered her
health.
To bring so great a crime into detestation, it is well that we should
tell how another person, also a woman, was bewitched in the same town. An
honest married woman deposed the following an oath.
Behind my house (she said) I have a greenhouse, and my neighbour's
garden borders on it. One day I noticed that a passage had been made from
my neighbour's garden to my greenhouse, not without some damage being
cause; and as I was standing in the door of my greenhouse reckoning to
myself and bemoaning both the passage and the damage, my neighbour
suddenly came up and asked if I suspected her. But I was frightened
because of her bad reputation, and only answered, "The footprints on the
grass are proof of the damage." Then she was indignant because I had not,
as she hoped, accused her with the actionable words, and went away
murmuring; and though I could hear her words, I could not understand them.
After a few days I became very ill with pains in the stomach, and the
sharpest twinges shooting from my left side to my right, and conversely,
as if two swords or knives were thrust through my breast; whence day and
night I disturbed all the neighbours with my cries. And when they came
from all sides to console me, it happened that a certain clay-worker, who
was engaged in an adulterous intrigue with the witch, my neighbour, coming
to visit me, took pity on my illness, and after a few words of comfort
went away. But the next day he returned in a hurry, and, after consoling
me, added: "I am going to test whether your illness is due to witchcraft,
and if I find that it is, I shall restore your health." So he took some
molten lead and, while I was lying in bed, poured it into a bowl of water
which he placed on my body. And when the lead solidified into a certain
image and various shapes, he said: "See! your illness has been caused by
witchcraft; and one of the instruments of that witchcraft is hidden under
the threshold of your house door. Let us go, then, and remove it, and you
will feel better." So my husband and he went to remove the charm; and the
clay-worker, taking up the threshold, told my husband to put his hand into
the hold which then appeared, and take out whatever he found; and he did
so. And first he brought out a waxen image about a palm long, perforated
all over, and pierced through the sides with two needles, just in the same
way that I felt the stabbing pains from side to side; and then little bags
containing all sorts of things, such as grains and seeds and bones. And
when all these things were burned, I became better, but not entirely well.
For although the shootings and twinges stopped, and I quite regained my
appetite for food, yet even now I am by no means fully restored to health.
— And when we asked her why it was that she had not been completely
restored, she answered: There are some other instruments of witchcraft
hidden away which I cannot find. And when I asked the man how he knew
where the first instruments were hidden, he answered: "I knew this through
the love which prompts a friend to tell things to a friend; for your
neighbour revealed this to me when she was coaxing me to commit adultery
with her." This is the story of the sick woman.
But if I were to tell all the instances that were found in that one
town I should need to make a book of them. For countless men and women who
were blind, or lame, or withered, or plagued with various infirmities,
severally took their oath that they had strong suspicions that their
illnesses, both in general and in particular, were caused by witches, and
that they were bound to endure those ills either for a period or right up
to their deaths. And all that they said and testified was true, either as
regards a specified illness or as regards a specified illness or as
regards the death of others. For that country abounds in henchmen and
knights who have leisure for vice, and seduce women, and then wish to cast
them off when they desire to marry an honest woman. But they can rarely do
this without incurring the vengeance of some witchcraft upon themselves or
their wives. For when those women see themselves despised, they persist in
tormenting not so much the husband as the wife, in the fond hope that, if
the wife should die, the husband would return to his former mistress.
For when a cook of the Archduke had married an honest girl from a
foreign country, a witch, who had been his mistress, met them in the
public road and, in the hearing of other honest people, foretold the
bewitching and death of the girl, stretching out her hand and saying: "Not
for long will you rejoice in your husband." And at once, on the following
day, she took to her bed, and after a few days paid the debt of all flesh,
exclaiming just as she expired: Lo! thus I die, because that woman, with
God's permission, has killed me by her witchcraft; yet verily I go to
another and better marriage with God.
In the same way, according to the evidence of public report, a certain
soldier was slain by witchcraft, and many others whom I omit to mention.
But among them there was a well-known gentleman, whom his mistress
wished to come to her on one occasion to pass the night; but he sent his
servant to tell her that he could not visit her that night because he was
busy. She promptly flew into a rage, and said to the servant: Go and tell
your master that he will not trouble me for long. On the very next day he
was taken ill, and he was buried within a week.
And there are witches who can bewitch their judges by a mere look or
glance from their eyes, and publicly boast that they cannot be punished;
and when malefactors have been imprisoned for their crimes, and exposed to
the severest torture to make them tell the truth, these witches can endow
them with such an obstinacy of preserving silence that they are unable to
lay bare their crimes.
And there are some who, in order to accomplish their evil charms and
spells, beat and stab the Crucifix, and utter the filthiest words against
the Purity of the Most Glorious Virgin MARY, casting the foulest
aspersions on the Nativity of Our Saviour from Her inviolate womb. It is
not expedient to repeat those vile words, nor yet to describe their
detestable crimes, as the narrative would give too great offence to the
ears of the pious; but they are all kept and preserved in writing,
detailing the manner in which a certain baptized Jewess had instructed
other young girls. And one of them, named Walpurgis, being in the same
year at the point of death, and being urged by those who stood round her
to confess her sins, exclaimed: I have given myself body and soul to the
devil; there is no hope of forgiveness for me; and so died.
These particulars have not been written to the shame, but rather to the
praise and glory of the most illustrious Archduke. For he was truly a
Catholic Prince, and laboured very zealously with the Church at Brixen to
exterminate witches. But they are written rather in hate and loathing of
so great a crime, and that men may not cease to avenge their wrongs, and
the insults and offences these wretches offer to the Creator and our Holy
Faith, to say nothing of the temporal losses which they cause. For this is
their greatest and gravest crime, namely, that they abjure the Faith.
Chapter XIII. How Witch Midwives commit most Horrid Crimes when they
either Kill Children or Offer them to Devils in most Accursed Wise.
We must not omit to mention the injuries done to children by
witch midwives, first by killing them, and secondly by blasphemously
offering them to devils. In the diocese of Strasburg and in the town of
Zabern there is an
honest woman very devoted to the Blessed Virgin MARY, who tells the
following experience of hers to all the guests that come to the tavern
which she keeps, known by the sign of the Black Eagle.
I was, she says, pregnant by my lawful husband, now dead, and as my
time approached, a certain midwife importuned me to engage her to assist
at the birth of my child. But I knew her bad reputation, and although I
had decided to engage another woman, pretended with conciliatory words to
agree to her request. But when the pains came upon me, and I had brought
in another midwife, the first one was very angry, and hardly a week later
came into my room one night with two other women, and approached the bed
where I was lying. And when I tried to call my husband, who was sleeping
in another room, all the use was taken away from my limbs and tongue, so
that except for seeing and hearing I could not move a muscle. And the
witch, standing between the other two, said: "See! this vile woman, who
would not take me for her midwife, shall not win through unpunished." The
other two standing be her pleaded for me, saying: "She has never harmed
any of us." But the witch added: "Because she has offended me I am going
to put something into her entrails; but, to please you, she shall not feel
any pain for half a year, but after that time she shall be tortured
enough." So she came up and touched my belly with her hands; and it seemed
to me that she took out my entrails, and put in something which, however,
I could not see. And when they had gone away, and I had recovered my power
of speech, I called my husband as soon as possible, and told him what had
happened. But he put it down to pregnancy, and said: "You pregnant women
are always suffering from fancies and delusions." And when he would by no
means believe me, I replied: "I have been given six months' grace, and if,
after that time, no torment comes to me, I shall believe you."
She related this to her son, a cleric who was then Archdeacon of the
district, and who came to visit her on the same day. And what happened?
When exactly six months had passed, such a terrible pain came into her
belly that she could not help disturbing everybody with her cries day and
night. And because, as has been said, she was most devout to the Virgin,
the Queen of Mercy, she fasted with bread and water every Saturday, so
that she believed that she was delivered by Her intercession. For one day,
when she wanted to perform an action of nature, all those unclean things
fell from her body; and she called her husband and son, and said: "Are
those fancies? Did I not say that after a half a year the truth would be
known? Or who ever saw me ear thorns, bones, and even bits of wood?" For
there were brambles as long as a palm, as well as a quantity of other
things.
Moreover (as was said in the First Part of the work), it was shown by
the confession of the servant, who was brought to judgement at Breisach,
that the greatest injuries to the Faith as regards the heresy of witches
are done by midwives; and this is made clearer than daylight itself by the
confessions of some who were afterwards burned.
For in the diocese of Basel at the town of Dann, a witch who was burned
confessed that she had killed more than forty children, by sticking a
needle through the crowns of their heads into their brains, as they came
out from the womb.
Finally, another woman in the diocese of Strasburg confessed that she
had killed more children than she could count. And she was caught in this
way. She had been called from one town to another to act as midwife to a
certain woman, and, having performed her office, was going back home. But
as she went out of the town gate, the arm of a newly born child fell out
of the cloak she had wrapped around her, in whose folds the arm had been
concealed. This was seen by those who were sitting in the gateway, and
when she had gone on, they picked up from the ground what they took to be
a piece of meat; but when they looked more closely and saw that it was not
a piece of meat, but recognized it by its fingers as a child's arm, they
reported it to the magistrates, and it was found that a child had died
before baptism, lacking an arm. So the witch was taken and questioned, and
confessed the crime, and that she had, as has been said, killed more
children than she could count.
Now the reason for such practices is as follows: It is to be presumed
that witches are compelled to do such things at the command of evil
spirits, and sometimes against their own wills. For the devil knows that,
because of the pain of loss, or original sin, such children are debarred
from entering the Kingdom of Heaven. And by this means the Last Judgement
is delayed, when the devils will be condemned to eternal torture; since
the number of the elect os more slowly completed, on the fulfilment of
which the world will be consumed. And also, as has already been shown,
witches are taught by the devil to confect from the limbs of such children
an unguent which is very useful for their spells.
But in order to bring so great a sin into utter detestation, we must
not pass over in silence the following horrible crime. For when they do
not kill the child, they blasphemously offer it to the devil in this
manner. As soon as the child is born, the midwife, if the mother herself
is not a witch, carries it out of the room on the pretext of warming it,
raises it up, and offers it to the Prince of Devils, that is Lucifer, and
to all the devils. And this is done by the kitchen fire.
A certain man relates that he noticed that his wife, when her time came
to give birth, against the usual custom of women in childbirth, did not
allow any woman to approach the bed except her own daughter, who acted as
midwife. Wishing to know the reason for this, he hid himself in the house
and saw the whole order of the sacrilege and dedication to the devil, as
it has been described. He saw also, as it seemed to him, that without any
human support, but by the power of the devil, the child was climbing up
the chain by which the cooking-pots were suspended. In great consternation
both at the terrible words of the invocation of the devils, and at the
other iniquitous ceremonies, he strongly insisted that the child should be
baptized immediately. While it was being carried to the next village,
where there was a church, and when they had to cross a bridge over a
certain river, he drew his sword and ran at his daughter, who was carrying
the child, saying in the hearing of two others who were with them: "You
shall not carry the child over the bridge; for either it must cross the
bridge by itself, or you shall be drowned in the river." The daughter was
terrified and, together with the other women in company, asked him if he
were in his right mind (for he had hidden what had happened from all the
others except the two men who were with him). Then he answered: "You vile
drab, by your magic arts you made the child climb the chain in the
kitchen; now make it cross the bridge with no on carrying it, or I shall
drown you in the river." And so, being compelled, she put the child down
on the bridge, and invoked the devil by her art; and suddenly the child
was seen on the other side of the bridge. And when the child had been
baptized, and he had returned home, since he now had witnesses to convict
his daughter of witchcraft (for he could not prove the former crime of the
oblation to the devil, inasmuch as he had been the only witness of the
sacrilegious ritual), he accused bother daughter and mother before the
judge after their period of purgation; and they were both burned, and the
crime of midwives of making that sacrilegious offering was discovered.
But here the doubt arises: to what end or purpose is the sacrilegious
offering of children, and how does it benefit the devils? To this it can
be said that the devils do this for three reasons, which serve three most
wicked purposes. The first reason arises from their pride, which always
increases; as it is said: "They that hate Thee have lifted up the head."
For they try as far as possible to conform with divine rites and
ceremonies. Secondly, they can more easily deceive men under the mask of
an outwardly seeming pious action. For in the same way they entice young
virgins and boys into their power; for though they might solicit such by
means of evil and corrupt men, yet they rather deceive them by magic
mirrors and reflections seen in witches' finger-nails, and lure them on in
the belief that they love chastity, whereas they hate it. For the devil
hates above all the Blessed Virgin, because she bruised his head. Just so
in this oblation of children they deceive the minds of witches into the
vice of infidelity under the appearance of a virtuous acts. And the third
reason is, that the perfidy of witches may grow, to the devils' own gain,
when they have witches dedicated to them from their very cradles.
And this sacrilege affects the child in three ways. In the first place,
visible offerings to God are made of visible things, such as wine of bread
or the fruits of the earth, as a sign of honour and subjection to Him, as
it is said in Ecclesiasticus xxv: Thou shalt not appear empty
before the Lord. And such offerings cannot and must not afterwards be put
to profane uses. Therefore the holy Father, S. John Damascene, says: The
oblations which are offered in church belong only to the priests, but not
that they should divert them to their own uses, but that they should
faithfully distribute them, partly in the observance of divine worship,
and partly for the use of the poor. From this it follows that a child who
has been offered to the devil in sign of subjection and homage to him
cannot possibly be dedicated by Catholics to a holy life, in worthy and
fruitful service to God for the benefit of himself and others.
For who can say that the sins of the mothers and of other do not
redound in punishment upon the children? Perhaps someone will quote that
saying of the prophet: "The sons shall not bear the iniquity of the
father." But there is that other passage in Exodus xx: I am a
jealous God, visiting the sins of the father upon the children unto the
third and fourth generation. Now the meaning of these two sayings is as
follows. The first speaks of spiritual punishment in the judgement of
Heaven or God, and not in the judgement of men. And this is the punishment
of the soul, such as loss or the forfeiture of glory, or the punishment of
pain, that is, of the torment of eternal fire. And with such punishments
no one is punished except for his own sin, either inherited as original
sin or committed as actual sin.
The second text speaks of those who imitate the sins of their father,
as Gratian has explained (I, q. 4, etc.); and there he gives other
explanations as to how the judgement of God inflicts other punishments on
a man, not only for his own sins which he has committed, or which he might
commit (but is prevented by punishment from committing), but also for the
sins of others.
And it cannot be argued that when a man is punished without cause, and
without sin, which should be the cause of punishment. For according to the
rule of law, no one must be punished without sin, unless there is some
cause of punishment. And we can say that there is always a most just
cause, though it may not be known to us: see S. Augustine, XXIV, 4. And if
we cannot in the result penetrate the depth of God's judgement, yet we
know that what He has said is true, and what He has done is just.
But there is this distinction to be observed in innocent children who
are offered to devils not by their mothers when they are witches, but by
midwives who, as we have said, secretly take from the embrace and the womb
of an honest mother. Such children are not so cut off from grace that they
must necessarily become prone to such crimes; but it is piously to be
believed that they may rather cultivate their mothers' virtues.
The second result to the children of this sacrilege is as follows. When
a man offers himself as a sacrifice to God, he recognizes God as his
Beginning and his End; and this sacrifice is more worthy than all the
external sacrifices which he makes, having its beginning in his creation
and its end in his glorification, as it is said: A sacrifice to God is an
afflicted spirit, etc. In the same way, when a witch offers a child to the
devils, she commends it body and soul to him as its beginning and its end
in eternal damnation; wherefore not without some miracle can the child be
set free from the payment of so great a debt.
And we read often in history of children whom their mothers, in some
passion or mental disturbance, have unthinkingly offered to the devil from
the very womb, and how it is only with the very greatest difficulty that
they can, when they have grown to adult age, be delivered from that
bondage which the devil has, with God's permission, usurped to himself.
And of this the Book of Examples, Most Blessed Virgin MARY, affords
many illustrations; a notable instance being that of the man whom the
Supreme Pontiff was unable to deliver from the torments of the devil, but
at last he was sent to a holy man living in the East, and finally with
great difficulty was delivered from his bondage through the intercession
of the Most Glorious Virgin Herself.
And if God so severely punishes even such a thoughtless, I will not say
sacrifice, but commendation used angrily by a mother when her husband,
after copulating with her, says, I hope a child will come of it; and she
answers, May the child go to the devil! How much greater must be the
punishment when the Divine Majesty is offended in the way we have
described!
Chapter XIV. Here followeth how Witches Injure Cattle in Various Ways.
When S. Paul said, Doth God care for oxen? he meant that,
though all things are subject to Divine providence, both man and beast
each in its degree, as the Psalmist says, yet the sons of men are
especially in His governance and under the protection of His wings. I say,
therefore, if men are injured by witches, with God's permission, both the
innocent and just as well as sinners, and if parents are bewitched in
their children, as being part of their possessions, who can then presume
to doubt that, with God's permission, various injuries can be brought by
witches upon cattle and the fruits of the earth, which are also part of
men's possessions? For so was Job stricken by the devil and lost all his
cattle. So also there is not even the smallest farm where women do not
injure each other's cows, by drying up their milk, and very often killing
them.
But first let us consider the smallest of these injuries, that of
drying up the milk. If it is asked how they can do this, it can be
answered that, according to Blessed Albert in his Book on Animals ,
milk is naturally menstrual in any animal; and, like another flux in
women, when it is not stopped by some natural infirmity, it is due to
witchcraft that it is stopped. Now the flow of milk is naturally stopped
when the animal becomes pregnant; and it is stopped by an accidental
infirmity when the animal eats some herb the nature of which is to dry up
the milk and make the cow ill.
But they can cause this in various ways by witchcraft. For on the more
holy nights according to the instructions of the devil and for the greater
offence to the Divine Majesty of God, a witch will sit down in a corner of
her house with a pail between her legs, stick a knife or some instrument
in the wall or a post, and make as if to milk it with her hands. Then she
summons her familiar who always works with her in everything, and tells
him that she wishes to milk a certain cow from a certain house, which is
healthy and abounding in milk. And suddenly the devil takes the milk from
the udder of that cow, and brings it to where the witch is sitting, as if
it were flowing from the knife.
But when this is publicly preached to the people they get no bad
information by it; for however much anyone may invoke the devil, and think
that by this alone he can do this thing, he deceives himself, because he
is without the foundation of that perfidy, not having rendered homage to
the devil or abjured the Faith. I have set this down because some have
thought that several of the matter of which I have written ought not to be
preacher to the people, on account of the danger of giving them evil
knowledge; whereas it is impossible for anyone to learn from a preacher
how to perform any of the things that have been mentioned. But they have
been written rather to bring so great a crime into detestation, and should
be preached from the pulpit, so that judges may be more eager to punish
the horrible crime of the abnegation of the Faith. Yet they should not
always be preached in this way; for the secular mind pays more attention
to temporal losses, being more concerned with earthly than spiritual
matters; therefore when witches can be accused of inflicting temporal
loss, judges are more zealous to punish them. But who can fathom the
cunning of the devil?
I know of some men in a certain city who wished to eat some May butter
one May time. And as they were walking along they came to a meadow and say
down by a stream; and one of them, who had formed some open or tacit pact
with the devil, said: I will get you the best May butter. And at once he
took off his clothes and went into the stream, not standing up but sitting
with his back against the current; and while the others looked on, he
uttered certain words, and moved the water with his hands behind his back;
and in a short time he brought out a great quantity of butter of the sort
that the country women sell in the market in May. And the others tasted it
and declared that it was the very best butter.
From this we can deduce first the following fact concerning their
practices. They are either true witches, by reason of an expressed pact
formed with the devil, or they know by some tacit understanding that the
devil will do what they ask. In the first case there is no need for any
discussion, for such are true witches. But in the second case, then they
owed the devil's help to the fact that they were blasphemously offered to
the devil by a midwife or by their own mothers.
But it may be objected that the devil perhaps brought the butter
without any compact, expressed or tacit, and without any previous
dedication to himself. It is answered that no one can ever use the devil's
help in such matters without invoking him; and that by that very act of
seeking help from the devil he is an apostate from the Faith. This is the
decision of S. Thomas in the Second Book of Sentences, dist. 8, on
the question, Whether it is apostasy from the Faith to use the devil's
help. And although Blessed Albert the Great agrees with the other Doctors,
yet he says more expressly that in such matters there is always apostasy
either in word or in deed. For if invocations, conjurations, fumigations
and adorations are used, then an open pact is formed with the devil, even
if there has been no surrender of body and soul together with explicit
abjuration of the Faith either wholly or in part. For by the mere
invocation of the devil a man commits open verbal apostasy. But if there
is no spoken invocation, but only a bare action from which follows
something that could not be done without the devil's help, then whether a
man does it be beginning in the name of the devil, or with some other
unknown words, or without any words but with that intention; then, says
Blessed Albert, it is apostasy of deed, because that action is looked for
from the devil. But since to expect or receive anything from the devil is
always a disparagement of the Faith, it is also apostasy.
So it is concluded that, by whatever means that sorcerer procured the
butter, it was done with either a tacit or an expressed pact with the
devil; and since, if it had been with an expressed pact, he would have
behaved after the usual manner of witches, it is probably that there was a
tacit or secret pact, originating either from himself or from his mother
or a midwife. And I say that it arose from himself, since he only went
through certain motions, and expected the devil to produce the effect.
The second conclusion we can draw from this and similar practices is
this. The devil cannot create new species of things; therefore when
natural butter suddenly came out of the water, the devil did not do this
by changing the water into milk, but by taking butter from some place
where it was kept and bringing it to the man's hand. Or else he took
natural milk from a natural cow and suddenly churned it into natural
butter; for while the art of women takes a little time to make butter, the
devil could do it in the shortest space of time and bring it to the man.
It is in the same way that certain dealers in magic, when they find
themselves in need of wine or some such necessity, merely go out in the
night with a flask or vessel, and bring it back suddenly filled with wine.
For then the devil takes natural wine from some vessel and fills their
flasks for them.
And with regard to the manner whereby witches kill animals and cattle,
it should be said that they act very much as they do in the case of men.
They can bewitch them by a touch and a look, or by a look only; or by
placing under the threshold of the stable door, or near the place where
they go to water, some charm or periapt of witchcraft.
For in this way those witches who were burned at Ratisbon, of whom we
shall say more later on, were always incited by the devil to bewitch the
best horses and the fattest cattle. And when they were asked how they did
so, one of them named Agnes said that they hid certain things under the
threshold of the stable door. And, asked what sort of things, she said:
The bones of different kinds of animals. She was further asked in whose
name they did this, and answered, In the name of the devil and all the
other devils. And there was another of them, named Anna, who had killed
twenty-three horses in succession belonging to one of the citizens who was
a carrier. This man at last, when he had bought his twenty-fourth horse
and reduced to extreme poverty, stood in his stable and said to the witch,
who was standing in the door of her house: "See, I have bought a horse,
and I swear to God and His Holy Mother that if this horse dies I shall
kill you with my own hands." At that the witch was frightened, and left
the horse alone. But when she was taken and asked how she had done these
things, she answered that she had done nothing but dig a little hole,
after which the devil had put in it certain things unknown to her. From
this it is concluded that the witch co-operates sufficiently if it is only
by a touch or a look; for the devil is permitted no power of injuring
creatures without some co-operation on the part of the witch, as has been
shown before. And this is for the great offence to the Divine Majesty.
For shepherds have often seen animals in the fields give three or four
jumps into the air, and then suddenly fall to the ground and die; and this
is caused by the power of witches at the instance of the devil.
In the diocese of Strasburg, between the town of Fiessen and Mount
Ferrer, a certain very rich man affirmed that more than forty oxen and
cows belonging to him and others had been bewitched in the Alps within the
space of one year, and that there had been no natural plague or sickness
to cause it. To prove this, he said that when cattle die from some change
plague or disease, they do not do so all at once, but by degrees; but that
this witchcraft had suddenly taken all the strength from them, and
therefore everyone judged that they had been killed by witchcraft. I have
said forty head of cattle, but I believe he put the number higher than
that. However, it is very true that many cattle are said to have been
bewitched in some districts, especially in the Alps; and it is known that
this form of witchcraft if unhappily most widespread. We shall consider
some similar cases later, in the chapter where we discuss the remedies for
cattle that have been bewitched. |