POPULAR BELIEF IN GHOSTS
SR HENRY HESKETH JOUDOU BELL, who recently retired as Governor of
Mauritius, spent many years in the British Colonial Service in the West
Indies, where he began his career in 1882.
Writing of his experiences in Granada and describing Quashie's "love
for and unshaken belief in the uncanny" with consequent "profound faith in
the existence of" ghosts, or as they are called in the West Indies,
"jumbies" or duppies, Sir Hesketh relates the following experience of his
own.
"I rented for some time a place rejoicing in the name of 'Paradise.' It
was in rather a lonely situation and had no near neighbours. On account of
the reputation the house bore, namely, of being haunted by troops of
jumbies, it was with the greatest difficulty that I could induce a groom
to sleep in the place, and only succeeded in getting one to stay by
allowing him to sleep on the mat outside my bedroom door.
"I certainly used to hear, during the night, all sorts of peculiar
noises and gruesome sounds, but the house, being an old one, was infested
by rats, and
{p. 145}
to the gambols of these gentry I ascribed the uncanny noises.
"The groom, however, emphatically denied the culpability of the rats,
and insisted on blaming the ghosts for the noise. Over and over he would
tell me that he would have to leave the work, as 'De jumbies does trouble
me too much,' and frequently, in the middle of the night, I would wake up
with a start, hearing the boy yelling out to me. 'What on earth is the
matter, you----?' I would call out in exasperation, only to receive every
time the same answer about the jumbies. 'Just listen, sah, dey lighting
matches all round the house.' I certainly could hear sounds as of matches
being drawn, but that was all, and the other sounds could be put down to
the hats that infested the place.
"One night, however, I was really horribly alarmed, and experienced a
good share of the feelings engendered by reading some of Edgar Poe's
ghastly tales. I was quite alone in the house and had given the boy leave
to sleep out for the night. I went to bed as usual and was awakened after
a few hours' sleep by some sound or other. The wind was pretty high, and
whistled mournfully through the trees. I had not had a pleasant dream, and
awakened with a feeling of uneasiness, while my thoughts reverted to
unpleasant ideas and some gruesome tales I had read the day before.
"The mournful cry of an owl resounded from time to time, and it seemed
to me the rats and bats seemed unusually restive and ghostlike. Heavens!
what was that rustling sound just outside beneath
{p. 146}
the window? It sounded like a footfall. There it is again! Gracious!
I'd swear that was the clank of iron, it sounded like fetters! A cold
perspiration broke over me, my hair was quite damp. I held my breath to
catch the slightest sound. Again I heard the clank of the chain, now close
beneath the window. All the blood-curdling stories of fettered ghosts I
had ever read flew through my brain. The moon shed fitful rays from behind
a cloud and enabled me to distinguish objects. Again the clank and a
rustle.
"Do all I could, I could not tear my eyes away from the window, and
every second I expected and dreaded to see a cold, white face with
gleaming eyes pressed against the window pane. I could stand it no longer,
and don't know what I was about to do, when an awful sound broke the
ghostly stillness of the night. 'Hee Haw! Hee Haw!' 'Twas the other donkey
loose outside. Never had I thought there was such enchantment in a
donkey's bray, never so sweet a sound had I ever heard, nor one so full of
comforting melody. Once more I was at peace, and, calling myself some
inelegant names, I turned on my other side and slept till morning." (1)
No doubt, many a ghost-story in Jamaica may be as easily explained away
by the incredulous visitor to the island, but certainly neither he nor
anyone else will be able to shake the superstitious belief of the "bush"
in the active agency of spiritual entities that exerts a really
extraordinary influence on the daily life of practically every Negro
whether he is in the West Indies or elsewhere.
Unquestionably, many a hair-raising experience is
{p. 147}
wrought with terrors that have their sole foundation in hysteria or
imaginative fear as a consequence of an attack of nerves, and one must be
careful about the uncritical acceptance of every story told, particularly
if it is of the hear-say variety.
On the other hand, it has been my experience, that the seasoned
missionary is naturally so sceptical on these matters that his tendency is
to sift all evidence and try to find a normal explanation for everything
and as a general rule his quest is not in vain.
Thus the very next district to my own was at one time in charge of a
missionary who suddenly found that his alarm-clock had developed a strange
propensity. He would leave it on the table and at his return find it on
the floor under the table. Sometimes he was awakened at night by the
clock's insistence on returning to the floor. Circumstances precluded all
possibility of the perpetration of a practical joke--he was alone in the
house. Finally, one day in broad daylight, while in an adjoining room, he
heard the clock crash to the floor from the table. This started a serious
investigation. The clock was an old one and would run only when placed on
its back. After due experiment and long observation, it was found that the
unwinding of the main-spring caused the key at the back to revolve, and as
the clock was resting on it, a slow but perceptible movement was
noticeable which made it gradually edge off the table. Thus another
perfectly good ghost story was spoiled.
Later the same missionary was able to trace a troublesome knocking that
had disturbed a household at all hours of the night, to an inoffensive dog
{p. 148}
which in the customary fashion of easing the annoyance of fleas had
caused the mysterious disturbance.
These instances are cited merely as illustration of the usual calm and
determined attitude of those who are habituated to the "bush" and who
necessarily cannot afford to let their nerves run away with them. They
instinctively seek to find a normal explanation for the phenomena that
would otherwise destroy their peace of mind.
What, then, am I to think of the accounts that have reached me from
seasoned missionaries and other equally reliable witnesses, giving me such
personal experiences as have defied their every effort at explanation by
natural causes? Several such signed statements are before me on my desk.
The writers generously give me permission to use the facts but naturally
ask to be spared undue publicity. I can appreciate their feeling as it has
taken me a quarter of a century to find enough courage to state openly my
own views and experiences. Personally I know each witness and can vouch
for his sincerity and soundness of judgment. Let me outline a few cases.
Some of these incidents are of comparatively recent occurrence, others
happened as much as thirty years ago or more. I have gathered them as I
could pick them up. But in every case I have obtained the account in
writing and over the narrator's signature.
Here we have an incident in Kingston. A man is annoyed by his dead
brother who "appeared to him several times over his bed and at eleven
o'clock in the morning, looking just as he did when he was in the coffin,
but no words were uttered." Two ordinary
{p. 149}
blessings of the house have no effect. The apparition continues on
unchecked. A special blessing is employed and the spectre comes no more.
To all appearances, the harassed man is sane and normal. If it is only a
delusion, it has so taken hold of the unfortunate that he is certainly
convinced of its reality.
Also in Kingston we have a distracted woman and her children who are
almost driven mad by the repeated apparition of a man in their house who
disappears as soon as accosted. The account continues: "Upon going to the
house and questioning the woman, what struck me as sincere and genuine was
that the woman and especially the son of about ten years were really
terrified, so much so that I was concerned for the boy lest he become
deranged by fear. There was no fooling about his story, and no
contradictions in it. I made him tell me the details, and show me the
places where he stood and where the man was, in the repeated apparitions.
I blessed the house and warned the mother to keep the boy's mind off the
whole affair. They were bothered once or twice again and then the trouble
disappeared. At least the people were sincere in their fear. There was no
request for money or material aid. Certainly the little boy was living in
an agony of terror. The mother was a very nervous person and I suspected
her for a while of terrorizing the boy. But I found out that to them, at
least, it was real. Who can say, whether it was so or not?"
Out in Westmoreland we encounter the conviction
{p. 150}
that unless a child of four is "properly" buried, the ghost will come
back and haunt the home.
Up in the Dry Harbour Mountains, an unbaptized boy is "troubled with
spirits" and his father seeks the help of the priest who writes: "I
started out with the boy's father and tramped through the mountains until
I wondered whether a white man had ever penetrated into that part of
Jamaica before. After a long climb, we at last reached the hut. Much to my
amazement I found the sick boy sitting on a high home-made bed. He looked
far stronger and more healthy than myself with apparently nothing wrong
with him. When I questioned him, he gave me the same story as his father
had given me, that he was troubled with spirits. As he lived so far away
from civilization, I gave him what instruction was necessary and baptized
him. A few days later I heard that the boy had died almost immediately
after my departure."
Now we have the example of an unfortunate leper who "during his
sickness used to be taken up and thrown around the room by some unknown
spirit."
From another part of the island this comes to us: "A woman sent for me
to come and bless her house for the reason that she and her daughter were
annoyed by evil spirits. I went and first questioned her on the nature of
the molestation. Her first complaint was that the malignant spirits
'rattled the shutters.' 'But that could be the wind,' I suggested. 'But
den dey trow stones in der window.' 'Some boys plaguing you.' She was
visibly annoyed at my difficulty to be convinced. 'Fader, I gwine tell you
der whole trute.
{p. 151}
My daughter and me in bed and dey empty der pitcher of water ober us.'"
Here is a somewhat longer account in the very words of the narrator.
"The following is the story told me by a black boy at X. He was lodged by
a woman who owns and lives in a haunted house. His bed was placed across
the floor in front of the door leading to the woman's bedroom. Though he
slept there for some time, he saw something only once, but he often heard
footsteps walking up and down the front steps. He swears to the truth of
these footsteps and also to the following. One night he awoke and saw a
woman standing above him. She stood there for a time while he looked at
her. She said never a word and finally turned and went out. He gathered
the impression that she wanted to get into the bedroom but his presence
had stopped her.
"The next day I spoke with the woman who owns the house. She says that
she used to see ghosts when she was a little girl but was never afraid
because they never harmed her, but just appeared to her. That stopped and
she had never any more experiences with the supposedly preternatural until
eight years ago, she is now about forty-five years old.
"She had bought a house and was living there alone. One night as she
entered her home, something took her by the arm and led her into the house
and then departed. She gathered it was a person. This was her first
experience. From that time to this day, she has been constantly frightened
by noises of various kinds and of a haunting character but mainly by
footsteps climbing the stairs. This is always at night,
{p. 152}
never in the daytime. Among others which she did not have time to tell
me, these were her special experiences.
"One night she woke up and heard footsteps coming to her door, in
through the door and across to a washstand which stood in the way to her
bed. She sat up, the ghost splashed in her wash basin and then flicked her
face with water. She screamed and the ghost departed. She touched the
drops of water on her face and wiped them off.
"Another night, she had a woman sleep with her to whom she told nothing
of the haunted character of the house. The woman in the morning, in great
fright, told her the same thing had happened to her, the flicking of the
water, and refused to sleep in the house with her again.
"Still another night, and this has happened a number of times, she woke
up from sleep, although not roused by noises. She turned over on her side
and screamed with fright, for she had turned over on an, other body. It
disappeared and she went to sleep again. Sometimes she is awakened by a
suffocating feeling and finds something pressing down on her shoulders and
body and enveloping her.
"Another night footsteps came across the floor; she sat up in bed; the
ghost approached and gave her a terrific blow in the abdomen. Since that
time she has suffered from a fiery internal fever which no doctor on the
island seems to be able to cure although she has seen many of them.
"Whenever she screams, the ghost departs. She cannot see the ghost but
only hears it and feels it. {p. 153} Asked if she knew any obeah-man, she
said that she didn't, but if she did, she would go to him if he could help
her.
"Apparently the ghost is afraid of men. For, when she has a boy
sleeping in the house she is not disturbed. But when a woman is with her
the ghost bothers her as usual.
"I believe there is something in her story. She was so certain of the
details, and there are a number of people who support her testimony. She
vowed several times that she was telling the truth and is tortured by the
ghost and she wants to sell a house on which she has spent money and
energy in making it comfortable for herself."
Whatever may be thought concerning the physical actuality of these
various incidents, even if the credibility of the witnesses should be
called into question by some, this much is certain, that to those
unfortunates who went through the experiences they were of terrifying
reality; and no amount of explanation or argument to the contrary would
shake their belief that they were victims of some spiritual force, call it
duppy, shadow or any other name you please.
This does not mean that they regard the agent, whatever it may be, as
in any way diabolical. Far from it. According to "bush" ideas concerning
the human composite of body and soul, there are qualities in the spiritual
element of man that enables it under particular circumstances to produce
certain extrinsic phenomena and to exercise a powerful influence for good
or evil as regards others, occasionally
{p. 154}
here in life but especially after death when it is freed from the
trammels of the body. In other words, the operations of duppy and shadow
are not to be regarded in themselves as supernatural but purely natural
since there is no intervention of a spiritual force outside themselves,
except perhaps as happens in the case of the obeah-man, when he undertakes
the control and use of these natural forces of the human soul. And even
then, it is really a supernatural use of a natural force that is
understood by the "bush" psychology.
Be that as it may, whether we regard them as psychic phenomena or
merely as popular superstitions, two elements are to be carefully
distinguished in Jamaica, the duppy and the shadow. It was once commonly
the belief that the obeah-man could catch the shadows of living people and
imprison them in a silk-cotton tree, with the consequence that the victim
of the lost shadow pined away and died unless the myal-man undid the
mischief by releasing the shadow and returning it to its owner. So, too,
while the obeah-man might "set duppies" on people for their endless
annoyance, the myal-man could free them from their spectral tormenters. To
differentiate properly these two elements, the shadow and the duppy, we
must go back to the Ashanti from whom they were originally brought to
Jamaica in the days of slavery.
Captain Rattray tells us: "The Ashanti use a number of names translated
into English by the words soul or spirit or ghost." (2) He then goes on to
define the various terms employed. Thus he writes:
{p. 155}
Saman is "a ghost, an apparition, a spectre; this term is never
applied to a living person or to anything inherent in a living person. It
is objective and is the form which the dead are sometimes seen to take,
when visible on earth, and in it they go about in the asaman or
samandow (the place of ghosts); samanpow is the 'thicket of
ghosts'; samanfo, the ghosts, i.e. spirits of ancestors. The
word has no connexion whatever with any kind of soul." (3) Elsewhere
Captain Rattray asserts: "A saman is in the form and shape of the
mortal body and has all its senses, or some at any rate, and feels hunger
and thirst." (4) It is further explained by the same author that according
to Ashanti belief, when a man dies, his spirit or saman immediately
appears before the Supreme Being, or as some think, before a subordinate
deity, and ascertains whether it is to go to the spirit world below or
haunt the earth for a time, if not permanently. He adds: "Such a spirit
then becomes 'a wait-about, wait-about spirit . . . . . . It does not
seem," he says, "to have much power for harm, and is shy generally, and
confines itself to frightening people. The saman, whose stay on
earth has been only ordained to last until his destiny has been fulfilled,
eventually disappears to the world where all spirits live." (5) It is also
observed that "food is constantly placed aside" for the saman, and
that when they are visible to the human eye they are "reported generally
as being white or dressed in white." (6) This is the Jamaica duppy in
every detail.
The Reverend R. Thomas Banbury describing
{p. 156}
Jamaica of his day, expressed the opinion: "The word duppy
appears to be a corruption of doorpeep, something peeping through
the keyhole." (7) Personally I am absolutely opposed to this derivation of
the word duppy, but as far as I can determine it is the only one that has
been suggested in Jamaica. Doctor Werner, writing to me, ascribed the
origin to Dupe, "ghost" in the "Bube" language of the southern and
eastern parts of the island of Fernando Poo. But while the cultural
influence of the Ashanti in Jamaica is paramount, there is no indication
of influence from the Fernando Poo group of slaves. Since, then, Ashanti
terminology has so dominated everything Jamaican, it is but reasonable to
turn to the Ashanti again when seeking further elucidation of Jamaican
problems. As a matter of fact we find in Ashanti the word dupon
signifying "the broad and large part of the root of certain trees above
ground, projecting like a buttress from the low part of the trunk," (8)
and it gives reference to the odum, or silk-cotton tree. Now it is
precisely among these buttressed roots of the silk-cotton tree that the
duppies in Jamaica are supposed to reside, and I cannot help feeling that
either the word duppy is derived from dupon, or possibly the latter
has acquired its name from the duppies who frequent the roots.
Mr. Banbury further states: "Duppies are ghosts which are supposed to
appear to persons in this country termed foyeyed or gifted with
second sight. It is commonly believed that departed souls return to earth,
haunt their habitations, or remain near
{p. 157}
where their bodies are buried. These eat and drink like living beings
and are displeased when the inmates of houses leave nothing for them in
the house at nights. For this reason the superstitious are known to let
food remain on the table for the duppies." (9) He further observes: "The
duppies generally appear in their grave clothes." (10)
While the duppies are primarily spiritual entities, they unquestionably
include a material element in their composition. On occasions of deaths in
the neighbourhood, especially if by violence, good care is taken at night
to plug up every crack and crevice in the hovels, "to keep the duppies
out." In fact, when about a hundred unfortunates were drowned at Montego
Bay during the hurricane of 1912, it was almost impossible to find a
messenger to go on an errand that would keep him out after dark, the
general excuse being, "Too many det (dead) round, sah!" Moreover, while
Mr. Banbury maintained: "Duppies are believed to act the part of guardian
angels to their friends and relatives," (11) I certainly never met any
Jamaican who was not averse to meeting the duppies of even those who had
been nearest and dearest to him in life.
Father Emerick writes: "The usual meaning of the word duppy, when not
taken in connexion with other superstitions, is the same as that of our
word ghost. The Jamaica duppies, like our ghosts, retain an interest in
the persons and the world they left behind, and seek intercommunication
with them. But their interest is seldom, if ever, otherwise than selfish,
or malicious, or vindictive. To be able to see and
{p. 158}
converse with duppies you must be a 'foyeyed,' that is a four-eyed,
gifted with a second sight, by which you can see what is going on in the
spirit world. For the foyeyed to see duppies it is not necessary for them,
like the mediums in our modern spiritualism, to shut themselves up in a
spirit cabinet or pass into a hypnotic sleep of any kind; they simply
cannot help seeing the spirits when they are around. Like our ghosts,
duppies amuse themselves by haunting houses, frightening people by
slamming doors, upsetting chairs, drawing bed curtains, etc. They have a
special attraction for untenanted houses and lonesome places. Haunted
houses are common in the country and to be found even in the city." (12)
Father Emerick goes on to relate the following personal experience.
"One of the city duppy houses was a large two-storey house. When I was
sent to Jamaica in 1895, to help Reverend Patrick Kelly, he was in the
throes of resurrecting a school in this same building. Father Kelly and
myself lived in this building, sleeping there during the night. This
building was said to be haunted by the soul of a wealthy leper who died in
it. Whether it was due to the dead leper or some other kind of a duppy, we
had some curious duppy experiences. One night we were both disturbed by
someone apparently coming to our door. About an hour or so after I had
grabbed quickly the knob of my door to keep out the mysterious intruder, I
heard Father Kelly calling out lustily from beyond a vacant room between
us, asking me if I had come to his door." (3)
Later the same author tells us: "But the Jamaica
{p. 159}
duppies do not limit their operations to haunting houses, but, like the
fairies they like to wander about. On this account, according to duppy
belief, you must not speak to unknown persons you meet in the road at
night. You might make a mistake and address a duppy and be knocked by it."
(14) And again: "These duppy knockers not only knock people but they have
a peculiar way of knocking in and about houses and making it very
uncomfortable for those living in them. There was scarcely a district
where these knocking duppies were not busy bothering some house." (15)
The Jamaica duppy, then, for all practical purposes, may be regarded as
substantially the same as our ghost, both as to its nature and its method
of manifestation and annoyance.
As already mentioned, according to Ashanti acceptation, the
"wait-about, wait-about spirit" is doomed to haunt the earth permanently.
The name for such a spirit is osaman-twentwen which is explained by
Christaller as "a departed spirit that is not admitted to the asaman,
on account of his wickedness in his life-time, but must hover about behind
the dwellings." (16) Twen literally means "to wait" and the
reduplicated form is an adverb signifying nimbly or cleverly.
In the Jamaica "bush" there is a similar belief that in the case of
notoriously wicked individuals, their ghosts of duppies go about
ordinarily in the form of a calf, with a piece of chain attached to the
neck, as a warning of the consequences of evil-doing. These creatures are
known popularly as "Rollen
{p. 160}
Calves," and they are thus described by Mr. Banbury.
"1 now advert to a curious superstition that is still rife in Jamaica
that is, the belief in what are called Rollen Calves. These are a
set of animals, or rather as it is believed, evil spirits in the shape of
animals, which travel at nights, and are often seen by the people. There
is hardly any of them but who will tell you that they have met with
Rollen Calves in the dark. These creatures of transmigrated
souls are seen in a variety of forms, like cats, dogs, hogs, goats,
horses, bulls, etc., and are said to be most dangerous and inveterate when
met in the feline form and of a black or brindled colour. A
bit of chain is generally attached to their necks, which they carry with
them from the infernal regions. People affirm that they often hear
the rattle of the rollen calf's chain about their yard at nights, and
listened to his battle with the dogs, who are its bitter enemies. They fly
at it with precipitation and compel it to retreat when they encounter it.
They are supposed to take up their abode in the daytime at the roots of
cotton trees, bamboos, and in caves, as duppies do. But at such a time are
not visible except to the foyeyed, or those that can see spirits.
"These creatures are also believed to be sometimes under an obeah
spell, when they will attack people in the night, and obstinately dispute
the path with them. They possess the extraordinary power of suddenly
growing from the size of a cat or dog to that of a horse, or bull. The
only way of getting rid of the infernal monster on such occasions,
is to flog
{p. 161}
him with the left hand. He is exceedingly afraid of a tarred
whip. Waggon men and others who affirm that they have encountered the
roaring calf, declare that they have heard him cry out when flogged
'Me dead two time, oh,' (I am twice dead.) They are very fond of molasses,
and for that reason are often seen at crop time about sugar estates at
nights, seeking to satiate themselves with this article. For the same
cause they have been known to follow the sugar wains, in the night,
conveying sugar to the wharf. They are said to be fond of cattle, this
occasions the breaking of the 'cow pen', the rollen calf getting in among
the cattle, and causing terror." (17)
In passing, Mr. Banbury illustrates his account with the following
anecdote. "A man who is a member of the Church of a certain denomination,
an educated and upright man, one whom I believe would not tell a lie,
informed me that he was travelling late one night, the moon was shining
brightly--when he came upon a very large black creature lying at full
length across the road. No dog, he said, could have been so large. He made
a lick at it with his stick in terror. The stick flew out of his
hand, and he never saw where the beast went. He got home, and took in with
fever and was ill for some time-no doubt from the fright. Of course, he
set it down to have been one of these fabulous creatures of the
night. His terrified imagination transformed what was most likely a large
black dog into a Rollen Calf." (18)
That Mr. Banbury regards the whole belief with
{p. 162}
absolute scepticism, is clearly evidenced. "I remember," he says, "one
night riding on a mule very late, and dozing going along, when the mule
made a leap on a sudden up a steep bank, from the road, and began to snort
at a great rate working his ears backwards and forwards. Nor with all my
efforts would he go down again. I was determined to find out the cause of
his fright, I alighted, went down into the road, and saw a very
curious-looking animal lying in the middle of the way, doubled up. I could
not make out what it was at all. It had long woolly hair of a whitish
colour. I gave it a sharp lick with my supple-jack, and up it sprang. I
then saw by the light of the moon that it was a young ass. After going on
a little further, I came upon the mother feeding. If there was ever a
close resemblance to a Rollen Calf, that was one; and any
superstitious person, without taking the trouble to examine it, would have
set it down to be one. These circumstances in point prove most
conclusively that 'Mr. Rollen' is nothing more than one of our domestic
animals seen in the night; or an animal that is not generally met with, as
was before hinted." (19)
Mr. Banbury suggests that the word rollen does not signify
rolling but roaring. (20) Once again I must disagree with him.
Never did I find any indication of such an interpretation in any part of
the "bush." I am rather inclined to think that we have here one of the
rare examples where rolling is used in the sense of wandering or
roaming.
As regards the superstition itself, this belief in the Rollen Calf
is rapidly dying out in Jamaica. The
{p. 163}
"bush" still talks about it, but in an incredulous sort of a way with
an air of amused toleration. At least, that is the conclusion I drew from
personal contacts in various parts of the island.
Entirely distinct from the saman or duppy or ghost, is the
Ashanti sasa which according to Captain Rattray "is the invisible
spiritual power of a person or an animal, which disturbs the mind of the
living, or works a spell or mischief upon them, so that they suffer in
various ways. Persons who are always taking life have to be particularly
careful to guard against sasa influence, and it is among them that
its action is mainly seen, e.g. among executioners, hunters,
butchers, and as a later development--among sawyers--who cut down the
great forest trees. The remorse that might drive the murderer in this
country to confession or to suicide, the Ashanti would explain at once as
the operation of the sasa of the murdered man upon his murderer. I have
mentioned occasionally in the preceding pages of steps taken to avoid the
vengeance of the sasa. The sasa is essentially the bad, revengeful,
and hurtful element in a spirit; it is that part which at all costs must
be 'laid' or rendered innocuous. The funeral rites . . . are really, I
believe, the placating, appeasing, and the final speeding of a soul which
may contain this very dangerous element in its composition." (21)
This is substantially the shadow of Jamaica. However, as in the case of
the duppy, we find a material element connected with the shadow in the
general acceptation of the "bush." Further it should be
{p. 164}
noted in passing that at a Jamaica funeral, as will be seen later, at
times the sasa or shadow is "laid" with as elaborate a ceremonial
as happens among the Ashanti.
In connexion with what is known as the Apo Custom, an annual
festival among the Ashanti, there is a lampooning liberty which is thus
described to Captain Rattray "by the old high-priest of the god Ta Kese at
Tekiman."--"You know that every one has a sunsum (soul) that may
get hurt or knocked about or become sick, and so make the body ill. Very
often, although there may be other causes, e.g. witchcraft, ill
health is caused by the evil and the hate that another has in his head
against you. Again, you too may have hatred in your head against another,
because of something that person has done to you, and that, too, causes
your sunsum to fret and become sick. Our forebears knew this to be the
case, and so they ordained a time, once every year, when every man and
woman, free man and slave, should have freedom to speak out just what was
in their head, to tell their neighbours just what they thought of them and
their actions, and not only their neighbours, but also the king or chief.
When a man has spoken freely thus, he will feel his sunsum cool and
quieted, and the sunsum of the other person against whom he has now
freely spoken will be quieted also. The King of Ashanti may have killed
your children, and you hate him. This had made him ill, and you ill, too;
when you are allowed to say before his face what you think, you both
benefit. That was why the King of Ashanti in ancient times, when he fell
ill,
{p. 165}
would send for the Queen of Nkoranza to insult him, even though the
time for the ceremony had not come round. It made him live longer and did
him good." (22)
1 sometimes wonder if this ceremony may not have given rise to the
practice still in vogue in Jamaica of "throwing words at the moon?" You
may tell the moon the most insulting things about a party within his
hearing without being liable for libel, as you would be if you addressed
the same words to your victim or to another person. Thus you in turn may
be called "a tief" or "a liar fee true," every word reaching you and those
who are standing about, and yet if you ask the vilifier what he is saying,
the answer will be: "Not you, sah, Him moon talk." It certainly "cools the
sunsum" of the speaker who goes away contented and satisfied, though it
must be confessed it has a far different effect on the object of the
remarks. I speak from experience.
At all events, with the Ashanti it is believed that malignity towards
another can physically affect the object of one's hatred, inducing
sickness and even death. It is this spiritual power of the soul, or as
Captain Rattray called it, "the bad, revengeful and hurtful element in a
spirit," that is known as the Ashanti sasa or Jamaica shadow. This is its
normal or natural function, independent of any supernatural co-operation.
It is, however, believed that it is within the scope of obeah-practice to
dissociate from living man this sasa or shadow, which accordingly
must have some entity of its own independent of the sunsum or soul.
Furthermore, unless the victim of this
{p. 166}
obeah interference succeeds in regaining his lost shadow through the
instrumentality of the myal-man, he is doomed to waste away with fatal
results.
On the other hand, when a man comes to die in the ordinary course of
events, his sasa or shadow tends to demand an independent existence of its
own to the annoyance of those who remain in life, unless it is captured
and "properly laid" at the funeral, as will be seen in the next chapter.
Accordingly, Mr. Banbury tells us that depriving persons of their
shadows is also called in Jamaica "setting the deaths on them," and he
explains: "It is believed that after the shadow of any one is taken, he is
never healthy; and if it be not caught, he must pine away until he dies.
The shadow when taken is carried and nailed to the cotton-tree." (23) This
of course, would be the work of an obeah-man.
It now becomes the task of the myal-man to try and restore the shadow
to the person from whom it had been taken.
After the great myalistic revival that followed on the emancipation of
the slaves the catching of shadows became almost as important as the
digging up of obeah, on the part of the myal-man who according to Mr.
Banbury, "declared that the world was to be at an end: Christ was coming,
and God had sent them to pull all the obeahs, and catch the shadows that
were spell-bound at the cotton-trees. In preparation for that event they
affected to be very strict in their conduct. They would neither drink nor
smoke. Persons who were known to be notorious for bad lives were excluded
from their society. At
{Two pages (167 and 168) missing in book--jbh.}
{p. 169}
been properly laid at the funeral, is ordinarily ascribed to the
duppies. This is probably due to the fact that, as in many parts of
Africa, it is not well to speak of the dead, especially under the
malevolent aspect, and so duppies in general are blamed for everything and
there is then no need of any reference to a particular shadow, which
otherwise hearing itself named, might feel called upon to make its
presence felt to the utter annoyance of the invoker.
Still another Ashanti term is the sunsum which is thus described
by Captain Rattray: "It is a man's sunsum that may wander about in sleep.
'It may encounter other sunsum and get knocked about, when you will feel
unwell, or killed, when you will sicken and die.' Perhaps the sunsum
is the volatile part of the whole 'kra'" (27) i.e. the human
soul. It was only on very rare occasions that I came across any
indications of vestiges of belief in this dream-soul during all the time I
was in Jamaica. Possibly there are still some who secretly place credence
in the theory that his dreams are actual experiences of a portion of his
soul far afield during the hours of sleep. But, I feel quite sure that
even the most ignorant in the "bush" have become too sophisticated to
openly admit such a belief.
Another superstition, now rapidly dying out in Jamaica, is that
regarding "Ole Hige," a sort of vampire that haunts the hovels of the
Blacks or is seen at times gliding along the roads at night in a fiery
glow. For many years I was convinced that this was nothing more than an
ingraft on Negro superstition due to contacts with the whites, as "Ole
{p. 170}
Hige" really means Old Hag and when she assumes her rôle as vampire, in
good European witch fashion, she doffs her skin before setting out on her
mission. In this connexion, we even find recorded the time-honoured story
of the husband who suspected the nefarious practice of his wife and
feigning sleep until her departure rubbed pepper and salt inside the
temporarily discarded skin. The usual discomfiture of the witch followed
in natural course. (28) What was my surprise, then, to find Christaller in
connexion with the Ashanti stating under the term Obayifo, meaning
witch, hag; wizard, sorcerer: "The natives describe a wizard or witch as a
man or woman who stands in some agreement with the devil. At night, when
all are asleep, he (or she) rises or rather leaves his (her) body, as a
snake casts its slough, and goes out emitting flames from his eyes, nose,
mouth, ears, armpits; he may walk with his head on the ground and his feet
up; he catches and eats animals, or kills men either by drinking their
blood or by catching their soul, which he boils and eats, whereupon the
person dies; or he bites them that they become full of sores." (29)
Concerning the Jamaica belief in "Ole Hige" in his day, we are informed
by Mr. Banbury: "This is another most curious creature of the imagination
which was much believed in times of old and greatly dreaded; and the
notion respecting the fabulous being of blood has not quite died out. It
delights in human blood, especially that of new-born infants. In days gone
by the "Old Suck," as she was also designated on account of her
imagined propensity, was
{p. 171}
to be seen enveloped in a flame of fire, wending her way late at nights
through the 'nigger houses,' or along the high road, bent on robbing some
poor innocent of its newly circulating blood of life. For this reason
infants just born were guarded with the utmost care from the voracious
creature of blood. This has given rise to the foolish notion, still
generally practised amongst the people throughout the island, of keeping
up the ninth night after the birth of an infant. This night is thought the
most critical, as on it the old hag uses her utmost endeavour to get at
the babe. It is the night previous to 'coming out of room' after child and
mother are confined for some days. On this night a constant watch is kept
up by the anxious mother, the midwife, and her friends. If the infant
comes off safe this night there is no more fear. The hag would not after
that molest it. Knives and forks, and sometimes the bible are placed at
the head of the infant to scare away the 'blow-fire'. The doors are marked
all over with chalk. This has the effect of keeping the old hag all night
counting until it be too late to enter. Sometimes mustard seeds are
scattered before them which have the same effect. Her approach is
suspected by an irresistible drowsiness and the flickering of the light.
If those who are watching should give way to this feeling and fall asleep,
woe to the unfortunate infant. The hag enters and sucks it. As soon as
this is done the child cries, the people wake up in a fright, the babe
takes in immediately with the locked-jaw and refuses the breast. The
little one is now considered doomed. The locked-jaw was always believed
{p. 172}
an invariable sign of the suck of an old hag, and in times of slavery a
great majority of infants died of it, no doubt from the bad treatment of
the mothers near up to the time of delivery by their owners, and from
exposure of the infants after birth. There were mothers also, who on
account of the rigour of slavery, no doubt used means to get off their
babes, rather than that they should have been subjected to the same
hardships as themselves. The strangest thing in connexion with this
superstition is, that it was believed to be the living that acted the part
of the 'old hige.' Women who were addicted to it had the power of
divesting themselves of their skins, and with their raw bodies issued out
at nights, in quest of blood. People have affirmed that they have seen the
'ole hige' going along in the night as swift as lightning, with blazes of
fire issuing out of her armpits." (30)
Strictly speaking, therefore, ole hige should have been dealt
with in the previous chapter on witchcraft, for she is a witch pure and
simple. And so she would have been, were it not for the fact that the
little residue of the superstition that still remains in the "bush" is, by
common consent, usually associated with duppies in general, probably for
the same reason as in the case of shadows already referred to, that no one
wants to attract ole hige's attention by naming her.
Mr. Banbury further speaks of the Jamaica "Rubba Mumma" or River Mother
which is known in Haiti as Mère de l'eau, and in Surinam as
Water Mama. Thus he says: "This superstition most likely
{p. 173}
took its rise from the story of the mermaid or water nymph
of England; she is believed to inhabit every fountain-head of an
inexhaustible and considerable stream of water in Jamaica. For this reason
the sources of such streams were worshipped, and sacrifices offered to the
'Rubba Missis.' It is a well-known fact that the slaves on water-works
used to persuade their overseers or masters, to sacrifice an ox at the
fountain-head of the water turning the mill in times of much drought, in
order to propitiate the mistress of the river, that she may cause rain and
give an adequate supply of water to turn the mill. It is said a bullock
was yearly killed on some of the sugar estates at such places for this
purpose." (31)
One's first impulse would be to agree with Mr. Banbury and find here
nothing more than a European nymph transplanted to a West Indian setting.
But maturer consideration leads me to think that this is rather a residue
of the old Ashanti myth about the divine origin of water, (32) as well as
a reflexion of what constitutes the very basis of Ashanti theological
beliefs, as Captain Rattray calls it, namely, the accepted relation of
every important body of water in Ashanti to the Supreme Being as "a son of
God." (33) For, as we are told, "Waters in Ashanti, some in a greater,
others in a lesser degree, are all looked upon as containing the power or
spirit of the Divine Creator, and thus as being a great life-giving force.
'As a woman gives birth to a child, so may water to a god,' once said a
priest to me." (34)
Among Jamaica Proverbs concerning duppies in general, the following may
be mentioned in passing:
{p. 174}
In the Jamaica Alphabet we have: "D is for duppy, him yeye shine like
fire," which would rather seem to have reference to Ole Hige than
to the ordinary run of duppies.
"Man don dead, no call him duppy," showing that a duppy is an after
death manifestation. This is clearly a use of duppy in its strictest
sense.
"Duppy say: 'day fe you, night fe me,'" meaning "Every man to his
taste," and implying the activity of the duppy by night.
"Ebery cave-hole hab him own duppy," that is, "Everyone has his own
trouble," but indicating the association of duppies with the darkness of
the caves.
"Duppy know who fe frighten," signifying "People will only injure those
who they know cannot retaliate." Doctor Martha Warren Beckwith, President
of the American Folk-Lore Society, paraphrases this as "The devil knows
whom to frighten," and defines a duppy as a ghost or an evil spirit of any
kind. (35) This, of course, is the most extended use possible for the word
duppy, but there are times in Jamaica when it is so used.
The present chapter has been concerned with the "bush" ideas in Jamaica
on ghosts and kindred spirits. Its purpose has been to analyse and
differentiate these beliefs as beliefs, and nothing more. There is no
question here of determining the underlying facts, if any.
The average Englishman or American in Jamaica, as elsewhere, would
scorn to admit any belief whatever in ghosts. And yet, if put to it,
either at home or abroad, how many of them would be ready to go
{p. 175}
alone into a cemetery at midnight without bolstering up their courage
by whistling? They may not believe in ghosts, but they are at least a
little nervous, to say the least.
So, too, I am convinced that while educated Jamaicans generally are apt
to protest loudly against this foolish superstition concerning duppies,
yet in their heart of hearts, after dark they have a wholesome respect for
the reputed habitat of Mr. Duppy, if not a positive dread of meeting him.
Certainly, in the "bush," duppies are accepted as fearsome realities.
Even were we able to prove dogmatically that such an entity could not
possibly exist, we would make little impression on the minds of the masses
of the simple children of Nature among the Jamaica hills. For, as the
Ashanti say: "If the spirit world possesses nothing else, it has at least
the power of its name." (36)
{p. 176} |