|
X. THE
SALT-CELLAR
The rhetorician
Arnobius, in his work "Disputationes contra Gentes," wrote that the pagans
were wont to sanctify or hallow their tables by setting salt-cellars
thereon. For owing to the fact that salt was employed at every sacrifice
as an offering to the gods, and owing moreover to its reputed divine
attributes, receptacles containing salt were also held sacred.
Indeed, the
salt-cellar partook of the nature of a holy vessel, associated with the
temple in general, and more particularly with the altar.
Pythagoras said
that salt was the emblem of justice; for as it preserves all things and
prevents corruption, so justice preserves whatever it animates, and
without it all is corrupted. He therefore directed that a saltcellar
should be placed upon the table at every meal, in order to remind men of
this emblematic virtue of salt.
The Romans
considered salt to be a sacred article of food, and it was a matter of
religious principle with them to see that no other dish was placed upon
the table before the salt was in position. A shell served as a receptacle
for salt on the table of the Roman peasant, but at the repast of the
wealthy citizen the silver salt-cellar, which was usually an heirloom, was
placed in the middle of the table; and the same custom prevailed in
England in mediaeval times.
In a work
entitled "Antiquitates Culinarim," compiled by the Rev. Richard Warner,
London, 1791, are to be found, reprinted from an old paper-roll, elaborate
directions for the preparation of the banquet-table on the occasion of a
great feast at the enthroning of George Neville as Chancellor of England
and Archbishop of York in the sixth year of Edward the Fourth, A. D. 1466.
After the
laying of the "chiefe napkin," the officials of the king's household
charged with such duties were directed to bring salt, bread, and
trenchers, and to "set the salt right under the middest of the cloth of
estate."
Minute
directions follow regarding the proper disposition of the trenchers,
knives, spoons, and bread, and their exact relations to the salt, which
was treated with special deference throughout the ceremony.
The Hon. Horace
Walpole published an account of the formalities observed at the "setting"
of Queen Elizabeth's dinner-table, as described by a German traveler who
was present on such an occasion. After the table-cloth had been spread two
gentlemen appeared, one bearing a rod and the other having a salt-cellar,
a plate, and bread. After kneeling three times with the utmost reverence,
they placed these three articles upon the table and withdrew. Later in the
ceremony came an unmarried lady dressed in white silk, and a matron
carrying a tasting-knife. The former, having thrice prostrated herself,
approached the table in the most graceful manner, and rubbed with bread
and salt the plates provided for the guests. After this the yeomen of the
guard, clad in scarlet, and each with a golden rose upon his back, entered
bare-headed, bringing a course of four-and-twenty dishes. In the
households of the English nobility a similar custom prevailed. A
rhythmical code of instructions to servants of the fifteenth century
required that the salt should always be the first article placed on the
festive board after the cloth was laid:--
Tu dois mettre premiérement en tous lieux et
en tout hostel
La nappe, et aprés le sel;
Consteaulx, pain, vin et puis viande,
Puis apporter ce qu'on demande.
In the "Haven of Health" (Thomas Coghan, London, 1636) are these
verses, quoted from an earlier author:--
Sal primo poni debet, primoque reponi,
Omnis mensa male ponitur absque sale.
A curious little treatise, with the title "How to serve a Lord,"
specifies how the principal salt-cellar shall be placed:--
Thenne here-uppon
the boteler or panter shall bring forthe his pryncipall salte . . . he
shall sette the saler in the myddys of the tabull accordyng to the place
where the principall soverain shall sette . . . thenne the seconde salte
att the lower ende then salte selers shall be sette uppon the syde tablys.
The custom of
placing salt upon the table before all else is thought to have originated
in the ancient conception of this substance as the symbol of friendship;
and indeed no banquet, however elaborate, was complete without it. The
salt was, moreover, the last article to be removed from the hospitable
board.
It was as
though our forefathers thereby intended that the guests, seeing salt on
the table, might realize that they were "invited in love and were loved
before they came;" and the fact that it was allowed to remain after the
other dishes had been removed might serve to remind them that while
feasts, like many other good things, come to an end, love and friendship
may be perpetual.
Macrobius
wrote, in the fifth century A. D., that the ancients did not consider
themselves as either welcome or safe at a banquet unless the salt and the
shrines of their gods were placed upon the table; the former indicating a
cordial greeting, and the latter being a guarantee of protection.
The ancient
"Boke of Keruynge" says: "Than set your salt on the ryght syde where your
soverayne shall sytte, and on ye lefte syde the salte set your
trenchours."
Mediaeval
salt-cellars were often elaborate pieces of silver. In Paul Lacroix's
Manners, Customs, and Dress during the Middle Ages are illustrations of an
enameled silver salt-cellar with six facings, representing the labors of
Hercules, which was made at Limoges for the French king, Francis I., in
the early part of the sixteenth century. At Corpus Christi College,
Cambridge, England, is preserved an elegantly wrought silver and golden
salt-cellar which belonged to Matthew Parker, who was appointed Archbishop
of Canterbury in 1558.
In the "Art
Journal" (vol. xxxix. 1887) is a description of the state salt-cellar of
Mostyn Hall, Flintshire, North Wales, which had been recently discovered
in an ancient chest. This magnificent piece of plate, which bears the
London date-mark 1586-87, is eighteen and one half inches in height and of
cylindrical form, surmounted by a vase, and richly ornamented with groups
of fruit, foliage, animals, and birds.
In mediaeval
England the chief salt-cellar was sometimes in the form of a silver ship,
thus suggesting both the briny deep and the craft which sails thereon.
King Henry III.
ordered twenty silver salts in the year 1243.
In the room
containing the crown jewels, in the Tower of London, are to be seen eleven
magnificent golden salt-cellars, the oldest dating from the reign of
Elizabeth. Of these the so-called state salt-cellar, which is a model of
the White Tower, was presented by the city of Exeter to King Charles II.,
and was used at coronation banquets.
Descriptions
and illustrations of old English saltcellars of different epochs are to be
found in a volume entitled "Old English Plate," by Wilfred Joseph Cripps,
M. A., F. S. A., London, 1886; and in "Old Plate," by J. H. Buck, New
York, 1888. In the former work mention is made of a magnificent
salt-cellar, "in the form of an olifaunt," the property of John, Earl of
Warrenes, in 1347; and another, "in the shape of a dog," belonging to
Edmund Mortimer, Earl of March, in 1380.
From an early
period until the close of the seventeenth century, the rank of guests at a
banquet in wealthy households, as in the halls of country squires, in
England, was indicated by the situation of their places at table with
reference to the massive silver centre-pieces which contained the salt,
sometimes called the "salt-vat" or "salt-foot."
At the head of
the table, which was called the board's end, and "above the salt," sat the
host and his more distinguished guests; and during the reigns of Henry
VII. and VIII. it was enjoined upon the ushers to see that no person
occupied a higher place than he was entitled to. Probably no penalty was
imposed upon guests who unwittingly selected a more honorable seat than
their rank warranted, other than removal to a lower position. But in the
less civilized era of the eleventh century, the laws of King Canute
provided that any person sitting at a banquet above his position should be
"pelted out of his place by bones, at the discretion of the company,
without the privilege of taking offense."
In a book
called "Strange Foot-Post, with a Packet full of Strange Petitions," by
Nixon (London, 1613), the author says in reference to a poor scholar:--
Now, as for his
fare, it is lightly at the cheapest table, but he must sit under the salt,
that is an axiome in such places; then having drawne his knife leisurably,
unfolded his napkin mannerly after twice or thrice wiping his beard, if he
have it, he may reach the bread on his knife's point.
The "Babees
Book" (1475) says: "The salt also touch not in his salere with nokyns
mete, but lay it honestly on the Trenchoure, for that is curtesy;" and the
"Young Children's Book" (1500) contains this passage: "It was not graceful
to take the salt except with the clene knyfe; far less to dip your meat
into the salt-cellar."
Joseph Hall, in
his "Satires" (1597), speaking of the conditions imposed by a gentle
squire upon his son's tutor, says that the latter was required to sleep in
a trundle-bed at the foot of his young master's couch, and that his seat
at table was invariably "below the salt."
Again, in a
volume of "Essayes," by Sir William Cornwallis (1632), occurs the
following:--
There is
another sort worse than these, that never utter anything of their owne,
but get jests by heart, and rob bookes and men of prettie tales, and yet
hope for this to have a roome cibove the salt.
Quite apropos to our subject are the words of an old English ballad:--
Thou art a carle of mean degree,
Ye salt doth stand twain me and thee.
The following
passage from Smyth's "Lives of the Berkeleys" refers to Lord Henry
Berkeley, who dwelt in Caludon Castle, near Coventry, in Warwickshire, in
the latter part of the sixteenth century, and may serve to illustrate the
importance of the central salt-cellar as a boundary:--
At Christmas
and other festivals when his neighbors were feasted in his hall, he would,
in the midst of their dinner, rise from his own, and going to each of
their tables, cheerfully bid them welcome; and when guests of honor and
high rank filled his own table, he seated himself at the lower end; and
when such guests filled but half his board and those of meaner degree the
other half, he would take his own seat between them in the midst of his
long table near the salt, which gracious considerate acts did much to gain
the love that his people had for him.
And in
commenting on this passage a recent writer remarks that his haughty wife,
Lady Katherine, highborn and beautiful and clever though she was, could
hardly be imagined as sitting "below the salt," out of consideration for
the feelings of an inferior.
In the houses
of well-to-do farmers among the Scottish peasantry in the latter part of
the eighteenth century, a linen cloth was sometimes spread over the upper
portion of the dinner-table, where sat the farmer and the members of his
family. Quite commonly, however, a chalk-line divided this end of the
board from the lower portion where the hired laborers were seated; and in
the more pretentious households the salt-dish served as a boundary.
In "Nares'
Glossary," vol. ii. p. 763, under the heading "Above or Below the Salt,"
the writer comments on the invidious distinctions formerly made between
guests seated at the same table, and quotes as follows from Ben Jonson's
"Cynthia's Revels" in reference to a conceited fop:--
His fashion is
not to take knowledge of him that is beneath him in clothes; he never
drinks below the Salt.
The Innholders
Company still adheres to the custom of indicating rank and social position
at table by means of a handsome salt-cellar of the time of James I., to
which is assigned the responsible function of dividing, the Court from the
Livery at the Livery dinners; the latter occupying the seats corresponding
to those of the retainers in the old-time baron's hall.
Among the
Puritans in New England "the salt-cellar was the focus of the old-time
board." Our ancestors brought with them from beyond the sea, not only the
ideas regarding table etiquette prevalent in the old country, but also
such tangible vanities as silver plate. Miss Alice Morse Earle, in her
book on the "Customs and Fashions of Old New England," says that the
"standing salt" was often the handsomest article of table furniture, and
mentions among the belongings of Comfort Starr, of Boston, in 1659, a "greate
silver-gilt double salt-cellar." Early in the eighteenth century these
ponderous silver vessels were superseded by the little "trencher salts,"
of various patterns, which are still in use.
THE OMENS OF SNEEZING
He is a friend at sneezing time; the most
that can be got from him is a "God bless you!"
--Italian proverb.
I. IN ANCIENT TIMES
THE ancient
Egyptians regarded the head as a citadel or fortress in which the
reasoning faculty abode. Hence they especially revered any function
seemingly appertaining to so noble a portion of the body, and dignified
even the insignificant act of sneezing by attributing to it auguries for
good or evil, according to the position of the moon with reference to the
signs of the zodiac. The Greeks and Romans also, by whom the most trivial
occurrences of every-day life were thought to be omens of good fortune or
the reverse, considered the phenomena of sneezing as not the least
important in this regard. Homer tells us in the Odyssey that the Princess
Penelope, troubled by the importunities of her suitors, prayed to the gods
for the speedy return of her husband Ulysses. Scarcely was her prayer
ended when her son Telemachus sneezed, and this event was regarded by
Penelope as an intimation that her petition would be granted.
Aristotle said
that there was a god of sneezing, and that when in Greece any business
enterprise was to be undertaken, two or four sneezes were thought to be
favorable. If more than four, the auspices were indifferent, while one or
three rendered it hazardous to proceed. About this, however, there appears
to have been no unvarying rule. Sneezing at a banquet was considered by
the Romans to be especially ominous; and when it unfortunately occurred,
some of the viands were brought back to the table and again tasted, as
this was thought to counteract any evil effects. The Greeks considered
that the brain controlled the function of sneezing. They were therefore as
careful to avoid eating this portion of any animal as the Pythagoreans
were to avoid beans as an article of diet.
It is related
that just before the battle of Salamis, B.C. 480, and while Themistocles,
the Athenian commander, was offering a sacrifice to the gods on the deck
of his galley, a sneeze was heard on the right hand, which was hailed as a
fortunate omen by Euphrantides the Soothsayer. Again, it happened once
that while Xenophon was addressing his soldiers, referring to the
righteousness of their cause and the consequent divine favor which might
be expected, some one chanced to sneeze. Pausing in his address, the great
general remarked that Jupiter had been pleased to send them a happy omen,
and it seemed therefore but right to make an offering to the gods. Then,
after all the company had joined in a hymn of thanksgiving, the sacrifice
was made, and Xenophon continued with his exhortation.
Among the
ancients sneezing to the right was considered fortunate and to the left
unlucky. In some erotic verses with the title "Acme and Septimius," by the
Roman poet, Catullus (B.C. 87-47), are these lines, twice repeated:--
Love stood listening with delight,
And sneezed his auspice on the right.
The omens of
sneezing were thought to be of especial significance in lovers' affairs,
and indeed the classic poets were wont to say of beautiful women that Love
had sneezed at their birth. The Italian poet, Propertius, while asserting
his enduring affection for Cynthia, the daughter of the poet Hostius, thus
apostrophizes the chief theme of his eulogies: "In thy new-born days, my
life, did golden Love sneeze loud and clear a favoring omen."
The Egyptians,
Greeks, and Romans regarded the act of sneezing as a kind of divinity or
oracle, which warned them on various occasions as to the course they
should pursue, and also foretold future good or evil.
Plutarch said
that the familiar spirit or demon of Socrates was simply the sneezing
either of the philosopher himself or of those about him. If any person in
his company sneezed on his right hand, Socrates felt encouraged to proceed
with the project or enterprise which he may have had in mind. But if the
sneeze were on his left hand, he abandoned the undertaking. If he himself
sneezed when he was doubtful whether or not to do anything, he regarded it
as evidence in the affirmative; but if he happened to sneeze after any
work was already entered upon, he immediately desisted therefrom. The
demon, we are told, always notified him by a slight sneeze whenever his
wife Xantippe was about to have a scolding fit, so that he was thus
enabled opportunely to absent himself. And in so doing Socrates appears to
have given proof, were any needed, of his superior wisdom; for Xantippe
had been known to upset the supper-table in her anger, and that, too, when
a guest was present.
On a column in
the garden of the House of the Faun, at Pompeii, there is a Latin
inscription which may be freely translated as follows:--
Victoria, good luck to thee and wherever
thou wilt, sneeze pleasantly.
Clement of
Alexandria, in a treatise on politeness, characterizes sneezing as
effeminate and as a sign of intemperance.
Probably the
only Biblical reference to the subject of sneezing is in 2 Kings iv. 35,
where the son of the Shunamite sneezed seven times and then revived at the
prayer of Elisha.
Hor-Apollo, in
his treatise on Egyptian hieroglyphics, says that the inhabitants of
ancient Egypt believed that the capacity for sneezing was in inverse ratio
to the size of the spleen; and they portrayed the dog as the
personification of sneezing and smelling, because they believed that that
animal had a very small spleen. On the other hand, they held that animals
with large spleens were unable to sneeze, smell, or laugh, that is, to be
open, blithe, or frank-hearted.
The function of
the spleen in the animal economy is not fully understood to-day. If the
above theory were correct, we should expect that the removal of a dog's
spleen would incite excessive sternutation and render more acute the sense
of smell, whereas the only marked result of the operation is a voracious
appetite. The theory is certainly unique, as well as illogical and absurd.
St. Augustine
wrote that, in his time, so prevalent was faith in the omens of sneezing
that a man would return to bed if he happened to sneeze while putting on
his shoes in the morning.
The learned
English prelate, Alcuin (735-804), expressed the opinion that sneezings
were devoid of value as auguries except to those who placed reliance in
them. But he further remarked that "it was permitted to the evil spirit,
for the deceiving of persons who observe these things, to cause that in
some degree prognostics should often foretell the truth."
In an ancient
Anolo-Saxon sermon a copy of which is in the library of Cambridge
University, England, reference is made to certain superstitions existing
among the Saxons before their conversion to Christianity. The writer says:
" Every one who trusts in divinations, either by fowls or by sneezings, or
by horses or dogs, he is no Christian, but a notorious apostate."
II. MEDIAEVAL BELIEFS ABOUT SNEEZING
From certain
ancient Welsh poems, it appears that sneezing was considered unlucky in
Wales in the twelfth century; but in Europe generally, in mediaeval times,
the sneeze of a cat on the eve of a wedding was reckoned auspicious. In
the writings of the French poet, Pierre de Ronsard (1524-85), the opinion
is expressed that not to sneeze while regarding the sun is a sign of
ill-luck; and from Doctor Hartlieb's "Book of all Forbidden Arts,
Unbelief, and Sorcery," 1455, we learn that in Germany there was a popular
belief that three sneezes indicated the presence of four thieves around
the house.
Jerome Cardan,
the noted Italian philosopher and physician (1501-76), in speaking of
genii or familiar spirits, remarked that, in his opinion, sneezing was a
supernatural phenomenon, and, like the sound of ringing in the ears, was
premonitory of some event of importance.
Some idea of
the credulous notions on the subject of sneezing which were prevalent in
England during Queen Elizabeth's reign may be obtained from the following
extracts from the "Burghley Papers," Lansdowne MSS. (No. 121) in the
British Museum.
1. If that any
man talk with another about any matter and snese twise or iiij tymes, let
him by and by arise, yf he sett, or yf he be stand, let him move hymself
and go straightway without any stays about his business, for he shall
prosper.
2. Yf he snese
more than iiij tymes, let him staye, for it is doubtful how he shall
spede.
3. Yf a man
snese one or iij tymes, let him proceed no further in any matter, but let
all alone, for it shall com to nought.
4. Yf two men
do snese bothe at one instant, yt is a good syne, and let them go about
their purpose, yf that it be either by water or land, and they shall
prosper.
5. To snese
twise is a good syne, but to snese once or iij times is an yll syne. If
one come suddenly into an house and snese one tyme, yt is a good token.
6. One snese in
the night season made by any of the household betokenyth good luck to the
house, but yf he make two sneses, yt signifieth domage.
7. Trewe yt is
that he who snesith takit pte (part) of the signification in this
condition, that he pte some pte with other.
8. Yf that any
man snese twyse iij nightes together, it is a tokyn that one of the house
shall dye, or else some greatt goodness or badness shall happon in the
house.
9. Yf a man go
to dwell in an house and snese one tyme, lett him dwell there, but yf be
snese twyse, lett him not tarry, neither let him dwell therein.
10. Yf a man
lye awake in his bedd and snese one tyme, it is a syne of some great
sickness or hyndraunce.
11. Yf a man
sleape in his bedde and snese one tyme, it betokenyth greatt trouble, the
death of some person or extreme hyndraunce in the loss of substaunce.
12. Yf a man
lye in his bedde and make a snese one tyme, it is a good syne both of
health and lucre, but if he sleape it is moche better.
13. Yf a man
snese twyse three nights together, it is a good syne, whatsoever he go
aboutt.
14. Yf a man
traver by the ways and come into an Inne and snese twyse, let him departe
out of the house and go to another or else he shall not prosper.
15. Yf a man go
forthe to seke worke and laye hands of it and then snese one tyme, let hym
departe, leaving his worke behind hym, and seke worke elsewhere, and so
shall do well; but yf he snese twyse let hym take his worke and go no
further.
16. If any man,
after he haue made a bargayne with another for any thing and then snese
one tyme, it signifieth that his bargayne will not continue.
17. Yf a man
rise betymes on a Monday mornyng out of his bedd and snese one tyme, yt is
a token that he shall prosper and gayne all that week, or haue some other
joye and comoditie.
18. But yf he snese twyse, yt is cleane contrary.
19. Yf a man
lose a horse or anything els, and is stopping (sic) out of his dore to
seke it, do snese one tyme, yt is a token he shall haue it agayne, but yf
he snese twyse he shall never haue it agayne.
20. Yf a man
ryse betyme on a Sonday and snese ii tymes, yt is a good tokyn, but if he
snese one tyme, it is an yll tokyn.
21. Yf a man at
the very beginning of dinner or supper be minded to eat, and snese twyse,
yt is a good tokyn, but yf he snese one time, yt is an yll syne.
22. Yf a man
lye sicke in bed and mystrusts himselfe, and snese one tyme, yt is a tokyn
of deathe, but if he snese twyse he shall escape.
23. A woman
being very sicke, yf she snese one tyme, yt is a syne of health, but if
she snese twyse, she shall dye.
III. MODERN SUPERSTITIONS ABOUT SNEEZING
Sneezing at the
commencement of an undertaking, whether it be an important enterprise or
the most commonplace act, has usually been accounted unlucky. Thus,
according to a modern Teutonic belief, if a man sneeze on getting up in
the morning, he should lie down again for another three hours, else his
wife will be his master for a week. So likewise the pious Hindu, who may
perchance sneeze while beginning his morning ablutions in the river
Ganges, immediately recommences his prayers and toilet; and among the
Alfoorans or aborigines of the island of Celebes in the Indian
archipelago, if one happens to sneeze when about leaving a gathering of
friends, he at once resumes his seat for a while before making another
start.
When a native
of the Banks Islands, in Polynesia, sneezes, he imagines that some one is
calling his name, either with good or evil intent, the motive being shown
by the character of the sneeze. Thus a gentle sneeze implies kindly
feeling on the part of the person speaking of him, while a violent
paroxysm indicates a malediction.
In the latter
case he resorts to a peculiar form of divination in order to ascertain who
it is that curses him. This consists in raising the arms above the head
and revolving the closed fists one around the other. The revolution of the
fists is the question, "Is it such an one?" Then the arms are thrown out,
and the answer, presumably affirmative, is given by the cracking of the
elbow-joints.
In Scotland
even educated people have been known to maintain that idiots are incapable
of sneezing, and hence, if this be true, the inference is clear that the
act of sternutation is prima facie evidence of the possession of a certain
degree of intelligence.
British nurses
used to think that infants were under a fairy spell until they sneezed.
"God sain the bairn," exclaimed an old Scotch nurse when her little charge
sneezed at length, "it's no a warlock."
The Irish
people also entertain similar beliefs. Thus in Lady Wilde's "Ancient
Cures, Charms, and Usages of Ireland" (p. 41) is to be found the following
description of a magical ceremony for the cure of a fairystricken child. A
good fire is made, wherein is thrown a quantity of certain herbs
prescribed by the fairy women; and after a thick smoke has risen, the
child is carried thrice around the fire while an incantation is repeated
and holy water is sprinkled about liberally. Meantime all doors must be
closed, lest some inquisitive fairy enter and spy upon the proceedings;
and the magical rites must be continued until the child sneezes three
times, for this looses the spell, and the little one is permanently
redeemed from the power of witches.
Among
uncivilized peoples the sneeze of a young child has a certain mystic
significance, and is intimately associated with its prospective welfare or
ill-luck. When, therefore, a Maori infant sneezes, its mother immediately
recites a long charm of words. If the sneeze occurs during a meal, it is
thought to be prognostic of a visit, or of some interesting piece of news;
whereas in Tonga it is deemed an evil token.
So, too, among
the New Zealanders, if a child sneeze on the occasion of receiving its
name, the officiating priest at once holds to its ear the wooden image of
an idol and sings some mystic words.
In a note
appended to his "Mountain Bard," the Ettrick Shepherd says, regarding the
superstitions of Selkirkshire: "When they sneeze in first stepping out of
bed in the morning, they are thence certified that strangers will be there
in the course of the day, in numbers corresponding to the times they
sneeze."
It was a
Flemish belief that a sneeze during a conversation proved that what one
said was the truth, a doctrine which must have commended itself to
snuff-takers.
In Shetlandic
and Welsh folk-lore the sneeze of a cat indicates cold north winds in
summer and snow in winter; and the Bohemians have an alleged infallible
test for recognizing the Devil, for they believe that he must perforce
sneeze violently at sight of a cross.
According to a
Chinese superstition a sneeze on New Year's Eve is ominous for the coming
year; and, to offset this, the sneezer must visit three families of
different surnames, and beg from each a small tortoise-shaped cake, which
must be eaten before midnight.
In Turkistan,
when a person to whom a remark is addressed sneezes, it is an asseveration
that the opinion or statement is correct, just as if the person accosted
were to exclaim, "That is true!" In the same country three sneezes are
unlucky. When, also, any one hiccoughs, it is etiquette to say, "You stole
something from me," and this phrase at such times is supposed to produce
good luck.
The Japanese
attach significance to the number of tunes a man sneezes. Thus, one sneeze
indicates that some one is praising him, while two betoken censure or
disparagement; a triple sneeze is commonplace, and means simply that a
person has taken cold. In Mexico, also, it was formerly believed either
that somebody was speaking evil of one who sneezed, or that he was being
talked about by one or more persons.
Sussex people
are prejudiced against cats which develop sneezing proclivities, for they
believe that, when a pet feline sneezes thrice, it augurs ill for the
health of the household, and is premonitory of influenza and bronchial
affections.
In an
interesting article in "Macmillan's Magazine," entitled "From the
Note-book of a Country Doctor," a physician practicing in a remote part of
Cornwall tells of a peculiar cure for deafness which recently came to his
notice.
One of his
patients, an elderly woman whose name was Grace Rickard, complained that
she could no longer hear the grunting of her pigs, a sound which, from
childhood, had roused her from sleep in the early morning. The doctor was
obliged to tell her that the difficulty was due to advancing years.
A short time
after, on calling at her house, he found her sitting before the fire with
a piece of board in her lap, and deeply absorbed in thought. Just as the
door opened, she exclaimed: "Lord, deliver me from my sins," and this
petition was followed by a peculiar noise which sounded like an abortive
sneeze. "Don't be frited, zur," she said, "'tes aunly a sneeze." "It's the
oddest sneeze I ever heard," said the doctor; "why can't you sneeze in the
ordinary way?" "So I do, when I can," she explained; "but now 'tes got up
to nine times running, and wherever to get nine sneezes from is moor'n I
knaw."
It appeared
that Grace was making trial of an infallible cure for deafness, the
necessary apparatus for which consisted of a piece of board and some stout
pins. One of the latter is stuck into the board every morning, the
patient's forefingers being crossed over the pin, while the pious
ejaculation above mentioned is repeated simultaneously with a vigorous
sneeze. On the next morning two pins must be stuck in the board, the
petition and sneeze being once repeated; on the following morning three
pins, three prayers, and three sneezes, and so on up to nine times.
IV. THE DOCTRINE OF DEMONIACAL POSSESSION
The natural
instinct of the untutored savage is to regard the act of sneezing as the
manifestation of an attack by a demon. Certain African tribes, for
instance, are said to believe that whoever sneezes is possessed of an evil
spirit, to whose malicious agency is due the violence of the paroxysm and
its utter disregard of times and seasons.
Dr. Edward B.
Tylor, in his "Primitive Culture" (vol. i. p. 97), asserts that the Zulus
have faith in the agency of kindly spirits as well, and says that, when
one of these people sneezes, he is wont to exclaim: "I am now blessed; the
ancestral spirit is with me. Let me hasten and praise it, for it is that
which causes me to sneeze." Thereupon he praises the spirits of the dead,
and asks for various blessings. But among most uncivilized peoples
sneezing is placed in the category of paroxysmal diseases, and reckoned to
be of demoniac origin.
Inasmuch as
sneezing is often one symptom of an incipient cold, which is a physical
ailment, and as among savage tribes every physical ailment is regarded as
a case of demoniacal possession, the use of charms and exorcisms to
counteract the efforts of the evil spirits seems a natural expedient.
When an
American Indian falls sick, he believes his illness to be the work of some
spiteful demon. Therefore, when he gets well, he changes his name, so that
the demon may not be able to recognize him again.
The chief aim
of the medicine-man, in treating a patient, is the expulsion of the evil
spirit; and this is the prime object of the various superstitious
ceremonies and incantations which are a prominent feature in medical
practice among savages. The medicine-man strives to drive away the demon
by frightful sounds and gesticulations, and by hideous grimaces and
contortions. Sometimes he makes a small image typifying the spirit of
sickness, and this image is then maliciously broken in pieces.
The natives of
West Africa believe that the mere mention of unpleasant names suffices to
frighten away the demons who cause sickness; and these spirits may
moreover be deceived by simply changing the name of a sick child. In the
province of Tonquin, a French possession in southeastern Asia, hateful
names given to ailing children are likewise thought to terrify the evil
spirits; but when the little patients are convalescent, pleasanter names
are substituted.
The Indians of
Nootka Sound, Vancouver Island, attribute physical ailments either to the
absence or irregular conduct of the soul, or to the agency of spirits, and
medical practice is governed accordingly; therefore the Okanogons of the
State of Washington subject patients affected with serious illnesses to
the magical treatment of the medicine-man.
The islanders
of the South Pacific have their own doctrine about the philosophy of
sneezing. They believe that, when the spirit goes traveling about, its
return naturally occasions some commotion, as is evident from the violent
act of sneezing. They therefore deem it proper to welcome back the
wandering spirit, the form of greeting varying in the different islands.
The phrase employed by the natives of Raratonga, for example, means "Ha!
you have come back!"
The "Sadda,"
one of the sacred books of the Parsees, counsels the faithful to have
recourse to prayer when they sneeze, because at that critical moment the
demon is especially active.
The Parsees
regard sneezing as a manifestation that the evil spirits, who are
constantly seeking to enter the body, have been forcibly expelled by the
interior fire which, in their belief, animates every human being. When,
therefore, a Parsee hears any one sneeze, he exclaims, "Blessed be Ormuzd!"
thus praising his chief deity. The Parsees are forbidden to talk while
eating, because at such times demons are on the alert, watching for
opportunities to gain admission to the body through the mouth while a
person is engaged in conversation.
Pious Brahmins
are careful to touch the right ear when they happen to sneeze either
during the performance of a religious ceremony or at certain other times
specified in the "Shastra," or holy books of the Hindus. Evil spirits were
believed to enter the body through the ears, as well as by the nose or
mouth, and the object of touching the ear was to prevent their gaining
admission there.
In reference to
this subject, Gerald Massey says, in the "Natural Genesis" (vol. i. pp.
83-80-):--
Sneezing is not
only a vigorous form of breathing, but it is involuntary; hence inspired,
or of extraordinary origin. A hearty sneeze, when one is ill and faint,
would imply a sudden accession of the breathing power, which was inwardly
inspiring and outwardly expelling. The good spirit enters and the bad
spirit departs, cast out by the sudden impulsion. The expulsion and
repudiation implied in sneezing is yet glanced at in the saying that such
a thing is "not to be sneezed at."
The natives of
Turkistan consider yawning to be a reprehensible act, originating from an
evil place in one's heart, and indicative of a state of preparedness for
the reception of demons. When, therefore, they yawn, the hand is placed,
palm outwards, before the open mouth, thus barring out the demons.
The once
popular opinion, which is still met with today, that the efficacy of a
medicine is proportionate to its harshness of flavor, is probably a relic
of the ancient theory which attributed illnesses to possession by evil
spirits. When one's body was believed to be the abode of such a spirit,
the natural desire was to drive out the unwelcome visitor, and to force
him to seek some other habitation. Nowadays we have so far abandoned this
theory that, while we may have faith in the virtues of bitter herbs, we
are ready to welcome also the palatable remedies of the modern
pharmacopoeia; but until comparatively recent times the science of
therapeutics was dominated by superstition, and physicians prescribed
remedies composed of the most repulsive and uncanny ingredients.
In Tibet
antiseptics are employed in surgical operations, the rationale of their
use in that country being the preservation of the wound from evil spirits;
and when smallpox rages in the neighborhood of the city of Leh, capital of
the province of Ladakh, the country people seek to ward off the epidemic
by placing thorns on their bridges and at their boundary lines. This
practice is strikingly analogous in principle to some of the superstitious
uses of iron and steel in the form of sharp instruments, of which mention
has been made elsewhere in this volume.
The aboriginal
Tibetans ascribe illnesses to the spite of demons, and hence a chief
object of their religious rites is the pacification of these malignant
beings by the sacrifice of a cow, pig, goat, or other animal.
Throughout
Christendom it is customary for those present to invoke the divine
blessing upon a person who sneezes, and the Moslem, under like
circumstances, prays to Allah for aid against the powers of evil. In
either case the underlying idea appears to be the same, namely, the
doctrine of invading spirits.
In ancient
Egypt illnesses were thought to be caused by demons who had somehow
entered the patient's body and taken up their abode there; and the
Chaldean physicians, actuated by the same belief, were wont to prescribe
the most nauseating medicines in order to thoroughly disgust the demon in
possession, and thus enforce his departure.
This doctrine
of spiritual possession was formerly even supposed to be warranted by
Scripture, and especially by a verse of the 141st Psalm: "Set a watch, O
Lord, before my mouth; keep the door of my lips." This passage was
interpreted as an entreaty for preservation from evil spirits, who were
likely to enter the body through the mouth, especially during the acts of
yawning, sneezing, talking, and eating. The Hindus consider yawning as
dangerous for this reason, and hence the practice of mouth-washing, which
is a part of their daily ritual. Hence also their custom of cracking their
fingers and exclaiming "Great God!" after yawning, to intimidate the Bhuts,
or malignant spirits. Sneezing is usually accounted lucky in India, except
at the commencement of an undertaking, because it means the expulsion of a
Bhutt.
Josephus
relates having seen a Jew named Eleazar exorcise devils from people who
were possessed, in the presence of the Emperor Vespasian and many of his
soldiers. His mode of procedure consisted in applying to the demoniacs
nose a ring containing a piece of the root of a magical herb, and then
withdrawing the evil spirit through the nostrils, meanwhile repeating
certain incantations originally composed by Solomon.
V. SALUTATION AFTER SNEEZING
The origin of
the benediction after sneezing, a custom well-nigh universal, is involved
in obscurity. A popular legend says that, before the time of Jacob, men
sneezed but once, as the shock proved fatal. The patriarch, however,
obtained by intercession a relaxation of this law, on condition that every
sneeze should be consecrated by an ejaculatory prayer. According to a
well-known myth of classical antiquity, Prometheus formed of clay the
model of a man, and desiring to animate the lifeless figure, was borne to
heaven by the Goddess Minerva, where he filled a reed with celestial fire
stolen from a wheel of the Sun's chariot. Returning then to earth, he
applied the magical reed to the nostrils of the image, which thereupon
became a living man, and began its existence by sneezing. Prometheus,
delighted with his success, uttered a fervent wish for the welfare of his
newly formed creature. The latter thence forward always repeated aloud the
same benediction whenever he heard any one sneeze, and enjoined upon his
children the same practice, which was thus transmitted to succeeding
generations.
Famianus Strada,
the Italian Jesuit historian (1572-1649), in his "Prolusiones Academicae,"
relates that one day, when Cicero was present at a performance of the
Roman opera, he began to sneeze, whereupon the entire audience,
irrespective of rank, arose and with one accord cried out, "God bless
you!" or, as the common phrase was, "May Jupiter be with thee!" Whereat
three young men named Fannius, Fabalus, and Lemniscus, who were lounging
in one of the boxes, began an animated discussion in regard to the
antiquity of this custom, which all believed to have originated with
Prometheus.
Even in the
time of Aristotle, salutation after sneezing was considered an ancient
custom; and references to it are to be found in the writings of Roman
authors. Pliny narrates in his "Natural History" that the Emperor Tiberius
Coesar, who was known as one of the most melancholy and unsociable of men,
scrupulously exacted a benediction from his attendants whenever he
sneezed, whether in his palace or while driving in his chariot; and
Apuleius, the platonic philosopher of the second century, alludes to the
subject in his story of "The Fuller's Wife."
Although the
fact of the existence of this custom centuries before the Christian era is
beyond cavil, yet a very general popular belief attributes its origin to a
much later period. The Italian historian, Carlo Sigonio, voices this
belief in his statement that the practice began in the sixth century,
during the pontificate of Gregory the Great. At this period a virulent
pestilence raged in Italy, which proved fatal to those who sneezed. The
Pope, therefore, ordered prayers to be said against it, accompanied by
certain signs of the cross. And the people were wont also to say to those
who sneezed, "God help ye!" a revival of a custom dating back to
prehistoric times.
Again, Jacobus
de Voragine (1230-98) wrote as follows in the "Golden Legend," a popular
religious work of the Middle Ages:--
For a right
grete and grevous maladye: for as the Romayns had in the lenton lyved
sobrely and in contynence, and after at Ester had receyvd theyr Savyour;
after they disordered them in etyng, in drynkyng, in playes, and in
lecherye. And therefore our Lord was meuyed ayenst them and sent them a
grete pestelence, which was called the Botche of impedymye, and that was
cruell and sodayne, and caused peple to dye in goyng by the waye, in
pleying, in leeying atte table, and in spekyng one with another sodeynly
they deyed. In this manere somtyme snesyng they deyed; so that whan any
persone was herd snesyng, anone they that were by said to hym, God helpe
you, or Cryst helpe, and yet endureth the custome. And also whan he
sneseth or gapeth, bhe maketh to fore his face the signe of the crosse and
blessith hym. And yet endureth this custome.
The Icelander,
when he sneezes, says, "God help me!" and to another person who sneezes he
says, "God help you!" In Icelandic tradition the custom dates from a
remote period, when the Black Pest raged virulently in portions of the
country, and the mortality therefrom was great. At length the scourge
reached a certain farm where lived a brother and sister, and they observed
that the members of the household who succumbed to the disease were first
attacked by a violent paroxysm of sneezing; therefore they were wont to
exclaim "God help me!" when they themselves sneezed.
Of all the
inhabitants of that district, these two were the only ones who survived
the pest, and hence the Icelanders, throughout succeeding generations,
have continued the pious custom thus originated.
In mediaeval
German poetry are to be found occasional references to this subject, as in
the following passage quoted in Grimm's "Teutonic Mythology: The pagans
durst not sneeze, even though one should say, 'God help thee.'" And in the
same work allusion is made to a quaint bit of fairy-lore about enchanted
sprites sneezing under a bridge, that some one may call out "God help,"
and undo the spell.
In the year
1542 the Spanish explorer, Hernando de Soto, received a visit in Florida
from a native chief named Guachoya, and during their interview the latter
sneezed. Immediately his attendants arose and saluted him with respectful
gestures, at the same time saying: "May the Sun guard thee, be with thee,
enlighten thee, magnify thee, protect thee, favor thee," and other similar
good wishes. And the Spaniards who were present were impressed by the fact
that, in connection with sneezing, even more elaborate ceremonies were
observed by savage tribes than those which obtained among civilized
nations. And hence they reasoned that such observances were natural and
instinctive with all mankind. We have the testimony of the earliest
English explorers that the custom of salutation after sneezing was common
in the remotest portions of Africa and in the far East. Speke and Grant
were unable to discover any trace of religion among the natives of
equatorial Africa, except in their practice of uttering an Arabic
ejaculation or prayer whenever a person sneezed.
The Portuguese
traveler, Godinho, wrote that whenever the emperor of Monomotapa sneezed,
acclamations were universal throughout his realm; and in Guinea in the
last century, whenever a person of rank sneezed, every one present knelt
down, clapped their hands, and wished him every blessing. The courtiers of
the king of Sennaar in Nubia are wont on the occasion of a royal sneeze to
turn their backs on their sovereign while vigorously slapping the right
hip. Among the Zulu tribes, sneezing is viewed as a favorable symptom in a
sick person, and the natives are accustomed to return thanks after it. In
Madagascar, when a child sneezes, its mother invokes the divine blessing,
conformably to European usage; and in Persia the sneezer is the recipient
of congratulations and good wishes.
In the
"Zend-Avesta," or sacred writings of the Persian religion, is the
injunction: "And whensoever it be that thou hearest a sneeze given by thy
neighbor, thou shalt say unto him, Ahunavar Ashim- Vuhu, and so shall it
be well with thee." In Egypt, if a man sneeze, he says, "Praise be to
God!" and all present, with the exception of servants, rejoin, "God have
mercy upon you!"
The Omahas,
Dakotas, and other Sioux tribes of American Indians attach a peculiar
importance to sneezing. Thus, if one of their number sneeze once, he
believes that his name has been called either by his son, his wife, or
some intimate friend. Hence he at once exclaims, "My son!" But if he
sneeze twice, he says, "My son and his mother!"
In France the
rules of etiquette formerly required that a gentleman who sneezed in the
presence of another should take off his hat, and on the subsidence of the
paroxysm he was expected formally to return the salutes of all present.
The salutation of sneezers by removal of the hat was customary in England
also. Joseph Hall, who was Bishop of Exeter in 1627, wrote that when a
superstitious man sneezed he did not reckon among his friends those
present who failed to uncover.
The Italians
are wont to salute the sneezer with the ejaculation Viva, or Felicitˆ; and
it has been reasoned that the latter expression may have been sometimes
employed under like circumstances by the ancient Romans, because an
advertisement on the walls of Pompeii concludes by wishing the people
Godspeed with the single word Felicitas!
So, too, in
Ireland the sneezer is greeted with fervent benedictions, such as, "The
blessing of God and the holy Mary be upon you!" for such invocations are
thought to counteract the machinations of evil-disposed fairies.
The Siamese
have a unique theory of their own on this subject. They believe that the
Supreme Judge of the spiritual world is continually turning over the pages
of a book containing an account of the life and doings of every human
being; and when he comes to the page relating to any individual, the
latter never fails to sneeze. In this way the Siamese endeavor to give a
plausible reason for the prevalence of sneezing among men, and also for
the accompanying salutation. In Siam and Laos the ordinary expression is,
"May the judgment be favorable to you."
In the
Netherlands a person who sneezes is believed thereby to place himself in
the power of a witch, unless some one invokes a divine blessing; and such
notions afford a plausible explanation of one theory of the origin of this
custom.
Grimm (vol. iv.
p. 1637) refers to a passage in the "Avadanas," or Buddhist parables, in
which the rat is represented as wishing the cat joy when she sneezes. And
in the department of Finistêre in northwest France, when a horse sneezes
or coughs the people say, "May St. Eloy assist you!" St. Eloy was the
guardian of farriers and the tutelar god of horses.
The natives of
the Fiji Islands exclaim after a sneeze, "Mbula," that is, "May you live!"
or "Health to you!" And the sneezer politely responds with "Mole,"
"Thanks." Formerly Fijian etiquette was yet more exacting and required the
sneezer to add, "May you club some one!" or "May your wife have twins!"
A Spanish
writer, Juan Cervera Bachiller, in his book "Creencias y superstitiones,"
Madrid, 1883, says that this widely diffused practice appears to have
originated partly from religious motives and partly from gallantry, and
that it is as obviously a relic of pagan times as are the various omens
which have ever been associated with sneezing.
The apparently
independent origin of the custom of salutation after sneezing among
nations remote from each other, and its prevalence from time immemorial
alike in the most cultured communities and among uncivilized races, have
been thought to furnish striking evidence of the essential similarity of
human minds, whatever their environment.
VI. LEGENDS RELATING TO SNEEZING
In the traditional lore of ancient Picardy is the following legend:--
In the vicinity
of Englebelmer nocturnal wayfarers were often surprised at hearing
repeated sneezes by the roadside, and the young people of the neighboring
villages made frequent attempts to ascertain the origin of the mysterious
sounds, but without avail. The mischievous spirit or lutin took pleasure
in seeing them run about in a vain search while he himself remained
invisible. Finally people became accustomed to hearing these phantom
sneezes, and, as no harm had ever resulted to any one, with the contempt
bred of familiarity they gave little heed to the spiritual manifestations,
and were content with merely crossing themselves devoutly.
One fine
moonlight evening in summer a peasant returning from market heard the
usual Atchi, atchi, but pursued his way with equanimity. However, the
lutin pursued him for about a mile, sneezing repeatedly. At length the
peasant impatiently exclaimed, "May the good Lord bless you and your cold
in the head!" Scarcely had he spoken when there appeared before him the
apparition of a man clad in a long white garment. "Thank you, my friend,"
said he; "you have just released me from the spell under which I have long
rested. In consequence of my sins, God condemned me to wander about this
village sneezing without rest from eve till morn, until some charitable
person should deliver me by saying a benediction. For at least five
hundred years I have thus roamed about, and you are the first one who has
said to me 'God bless you.' Fortunately it occurred to me to follow you,
and thus I have been set free. I thank you. Good-by."
Thereafter the
mysterious sounds were no longer heard; and thus, in the belief of the
peasants of Picardy, arose the custom of salutation after sneezing.
Under a bridge
near the town of Paderborn, in Prussia, there lives a poor soul who does
nothing but sneeze at frequent intervals. If a wagon happens to pass over
the bridge at the moment when a sneeze is heard, and the driver fails to
say "God help thee," the vehicle will surely be overturned, and the driver
will become poor and break his leg.
Tradition says
that a godless fellow who died long ago of incessant sneezing, during an
epidemic of the plague at Wurmlingen in Würtemberg, was condemned on
account of his sins to wander about the neighborhood, still sneezing at
intervals. One day, while one of the villagers was crossing a bridge over
some meadows near the town, he heard some one underneath sneeze twice, and
each time he piously responded, "God help thee!" When, however, he heard a
third sneeze, the villager thought to himself, "That fellow may keep on
sneezing for a long time and make a fool of me." So he cried out angrily,
"May the Devil help you!" Thereupon a voice from under the bridge
exclaimed pitifully, "If you had only said, 'God help thee!' a third time,
I should have been freed from the spell which binds me."
DAYS OF GOOD AND EVIL OMEN
Friday's moon,
Come when it will, it comes too soon.
--Proverb.
1. EGYPTIAN DAYS
THE belief in
lucky and unlucky days appears to have been first taught by the magicians
of ancient Chaldea, and we learn from history that similar notions
affected every detail of primitive Babylonian life, thousands of years
before Christ. Reference to an "unlucky month" is to be found in a list of
deprecatory incantations contained in a document from the library of the
royal palace at Nineveh. This document is written in the Accadian dialect
of the Turanian language, which was akin to that spoken in the region of
the lower Euphrates; a language already obsolete and unintelligible to the
Assyrians of the seventh century B. C. Certain days were called Dies
Egyptiaci, because they were thought to have been pronounced unluck by the
astrologers of ancient Egypt.
In that country
the unlucky days were, however, fewer in number than the fortunate ones,
and they also differed in the degree of their ill-luck. Thus, while some
were markedly ominous, others merely threatened misfortune, and still
others were of mixed augury, partly good and partly evil. There were
certain days upon which absolute idleness was enjoined upon the people,
when they were expected to sit quietly at home, indulging in dolce far
niente.
The poet Hesiod,
who is believed to have flourished about one thousand years B. C., in the
third book of his poem, "Works and Days," which is indeed a kind of
metrical almanac, distinguishes lucky days from others, and gives advice
to farmers regarding the most favorable days for the various operations of
agriculture. Thus he recommends the eleventh of the month as excellent for
reaping corn, and the twelfth for shearing sheep. But the thirteenth was
an unlucky day for sowing, though favorable for planting. The fifth of
each month was an especially unfortunate day, while the thirtieth was the
most propitious of all.
Some of the
most intelligent and learned Greeks were very punctilious in their
observance of Egyptian days. The philosopher Proclus (A.D. 412-480) was
said to be even more scrupulous in this regard than the Egyptians
themselves. And Plotinus (A. D. 204-270), another eminent Grecian
philosopher, believed with the astrologers of a later day, that the
positions of the planets in the heavens exerted an influence over human
affairs.
In an ancient
calendar of the year 334, in the reign of Constantine the Great,
twenty-six Egyptian days were designated. At an early period, however, the
church authorities forbade the superstitious observance of these days.
Some of the
most eminent early writers of the Christian Church, St. Ambrose, St.
Augustine, and St. Chrysostom, were earnest in their denunciation of the
prevalent custom of regulating the affairs of life by reference to the
supposed omens of the calendar. The fourth council of Carthage, in 398,
censured such practices; and the synod of Rouen, in the reign of Clovis,
anathematized those who placed faith in such relics of paganism.
We learn on the
authority of Marco Polo that the Brahmins of the province of Laristan, in
southern Persia, in the thirteenth century, were extremely punctilious in
their choice of suitable days for the performance of any business matters.
This famous traveler wrote that a Brahmin who contemplated making a
purchase, for example, would measure the length of his own shadow in the
early morning sunlight, and if the shadow were of the proper length, as
officially prescribed for that day, he would proceed to make the purchase;
otherwise he would wait until the shadow conformed in length to a
predetermined standard for that day of the week.
The Latin
historian, Rolandino (1200-76), in the third book of his "Chronicle,"
describes an undertaking which resulted disastrously because, as was
alleged, it was rashly begun on an "Egyptian day." There is frequent
mention of these days in many ancient manuscripts in the Ambrosian Library
at Milan.
In a so-called
"Book of Precedents," printed in 1616, fifty-three days are specified as
being "such as the Egyptians noted to be dangerous to begin or take
anything in hand, or to take a journey or any such thing." An ancient
manuscript mentions twenty-eight days in the year "which were revealed by
the Angel Gabriel to good Joseph, which ever have been remarked to be very
fortunayte dayes either to let blood, cure wounds, use marchandizes, sow
seed, build houses, or take journees."
Astrologers
formerly specified particular days when it was dangerous for physicians to
bleed patients; and especially to be avoided were the first Monday in
April, on which day Cain was born and his brother Abel slain; the first
Monday in August, the alleged anniversary of the destruction of Sodom and
Gomorrah; and the last Monday in December, which was the reputed birthday
of Judas Iscariot.
In Mason's
"Anatomic of Sorcerie" (1612), the prevailing notions on this subject were
characterized as vain speculations of the astrologers, having neither
foundation in God's word nor yet natural reason to support them, but being
grounded only upon the superstitious imagination of men. A work of 1620,
entitled "Melton's Astrologaster," says that the Christian faith is
violated when, like a pagan and apostate, any man "doth observe those days
which are called Egyptiaci, or the calends of January, or any month, day,
time, or year, either to travel, marry or do anything in." And the learned
Sir Thomas Browne, in his "Pseudodoxia Epidemica," published in 1658,
declaimed in quaint but forcible language against the frivolity of such
doctrines.
II. ROMAN SUPERSTITION
CONCERNING DAYS
The Romans had
their dies fasti, corresponding to the modern court days in England. On
such days, of which there were thirty-eight in the year, it was lawful for
the praetor to administer justice and to pronounce the three words, Do,
dico, addico, "I give laws, declare right, and adjudge losses."
The days on
which the courts were not held were called nefasti (from ne and fari),
because the three words could not then be legally spoken by the praetor.
But these days came to be regarded as unlucky, a fact rendered evident by
an expression of Horace. The Romans also classed as unfortunate the days
immediately following the calends, nones, and ides of each month. Unlucky
days were termed dies atri, because they were marked in the calendar with
black charcoal, the lucky ones being indicated by means of white chalk.
There were also days which were thought especially favorable for martial
operations, but the anniversary of a national misfortune was considered
very inauspicious. Thus after the defeat of the Romans by the Gauls under
Brennus on the banks of the river Allia, July 16, 390 B. C., that date was
given a prominent place among the black days of the calendar. But not
every general was influenced by such superstitions. Lucullus, when an
attempt was made to dissuade him from attacking Tigranes, king of Armenia
(whom he defeated B. C. 69), because upon that date the Cimbri had
vanquished a Roman army, replied, "I will make it a day of good omen for
the Romans." The Roman ladies, we are told, gave less heed to the unlucky
days of their own calendar than to the works of Egyptian astrologers,
among whom Petosiris was their favorite authority, when they wished to
ascertain the proper day, and even the hour, for the performance of
household and other duties.
Horace (book
ii. ode xiii.) thus apostrophizes a tree, by whose fall he narrowly
escaped being crushed at Sabinum: "Thou cursed tree! whoever he was that
first planted thee did it surely on an unlucky day, and with a
sacrilegious hand."
The Latin
writer, Macrobius, stated that when one of the nundinoe or market days
fell upon New Year's, it was considered very unfortunate. In such an event
the Emperor Augustus, who was very superstitious, adopted the method of
inserting an extra day in the previous year and subtracting one from that
ensuing, thus preserving the regularity of the Julian style of reckoning
time. Ordinarily, however, New Year's Day was deemed auspicious, and on
that day, as now, people were accustomed to wish each other happiness and
good fortune.
III. MEDIEVAL BELIEF IN
DAY-FATALITY
The early
Saxons in England were extremely credulous in regard to the luck or
misfortune of particular days of the month, and derived a legion of
prognostics, both good and evil, from the age of the moon. Thus, they
considered the twelfth day of the lunar month a profitable one for sowing,
getting married, traveling, and blood-letting, but the thirteenth day was
in bad repute among the Saxons, an evil day for undertaking any work. The
fourteenth was good for all purposes, for buying serfs, marrying, and
putting children to school; whereas the sixteenth was profitable for
nothing but thieving. The twenty-second was a proper time for buying
villains, or agricultural bondmen, and a boy born on that day would become
a physician. The twenty-fifth was good for hunting, and a girl then born
would be of a greedy disposition and a "wool-teaser."
In an English
manuscript of the twelfth century mentioned in Chambers's "Book of Days,"
and known as the "Exeter Calendar," New Year's is set down as a Dies mala.
As an illustration of the credulity prevalent in England in the fifteenth
century regarding the influences, meteorological and moral, of the
occurrence of important church festivals on particular days of the week, a
few lines from a manuscript of the Harleian Collection in the British
Museum are here quoted:--
Lordlings all of you I warn,
If the day that Christ was born
Fell upon a Sunday,
The winter shall be good, I say,
But great winds aloft shall be;
The summer shall be fair and dry,
By kind skill and without loss.
Through all lands there shall be peace.
Good time for all things to be done,
But he that stealeth shall be found soon.
What child that day born may be
A great lord he shall live to be.
Not alone in
Britain, but throughout the world, men have esteemed one day above
another. This universal tendency of the human mind is tersely expressed in
a translation by Barnaby Googe of some verses accredited to the Bavarian
theologian, Thomas Kirchmaier (1511-78), whose literary pseudonym was
Naogeorgus:--
And first, betwixt the dayes they make no
little difference,
For all be not of vertue like, nor like preheminence,
But some of them Egyptian are and full of jeopardee,
And some againe, beside the rest, both good and luckie bee,
Like difference of the nights they make, as if the Almightie King,
That made them all, not gracious were to them in everything.
John Gaule, in his "Magastromancer" (1652), remarks that, according to
the teachings of the astrologers,
"Times can give
a certain fortune to our business. The magicians likewise have observed,
and all the antient verse men consent in this, that it is of very great
concernment in what moment of time and disposition of the heavens
everything, whether naturall or artificial, hath received its being in
this world: for they have delivered that the first moment hath so great
power that all the course of fortune dependeth thereon and may be foretold
thereby."
In the dark
ages, and also in early modern times, the false doctrines of astrology, an
inheritance from the ancients, dominated the actions of men. In all
important enterprises, as well as in every-day labors, it was deemed
essential to make a beginning under the influence of a favorable planet.
Nor did these beliefs prevail exclusively among ignorant people, but were
as well a part of the creed of scholars, and of the nobility and gentry.
Modern astronomical discoveries, and especially the Copernican system,
availed to banish a vast amount of superstition regarding the malevolent
character of certain days. But neither science nor religion have yet been
able wholly to eradicate it, as is evident from the ill-repute associated
with the sixth day of the week even at the present time, a subject to be
considered later.
In the "Loseley
Manuscripts," edited by Alfred John Kempe, London, 1836, is to be found a
letter, some extracts from which may serve to illustrate the paramount
influence of astrology in England in the sixteenth century. The letter is
addressed to Mr. George More, at Thorpe:--
As for my
comming to you upon Wensday next . . . I cannot possibly be with you till
Thursday.
On Fryday and
Saterday the signe will be in the heart, on Sunday, Monday and Tuesday in
the stomake, during which tyme it wil be no good dealing wth your ordinary
phisicke until Wensday come Sevenight at the nearest, and from that tyme
forwards for 15 or 16 days passing good. In w'ch time yf it will please
you to let me understand of your convenient opportunity and season, I will
not faill to come along presently with your messenger.
Your Worship's assured
lovinge friend
SIMON TRIPPE, M.D.
WINTON, Septemb. 18. 1581.
The influence
of the position of the moon in determining the proper seasons for surgical
operations, and for the administration of medicines, may be best
illustrated by a few extracts from ancient almanacs.
An antique
illustrated manuscript almanac for the year 1386 contains the following
advice to physicians:
In a new mone
sal not be layting of blode, for yan are mennys bodyes voyed of blode and
humos, and yan by layting of blode sal yay more be anoyded.
And again:--
It es to know
generally, yt ye tyme electe to gyve a medcyn in es whan ye mone and ye
Lord ascendyng ar free from all ille and not let by it, . . . and it es
hyely to be ware to a medcyn whyles ye mone es in ill aspect, wt Satne or
Mars.
An almanac for the year 1568, published by John Securis, London,
contains a list of days in that year favorable or otherwise for the
preservation of man's health.
The second day
of January was therein declared to be wholly propitious. The twelfth was
unfavorable owing to the furious aspect of Mars to the Sun, which was not,
however, likely to cause bodily sickness, but rather to incline the hearts
of some people to imagine evil of their rulers. The fifteenth of April was
especially to be dreaded. On that day, says the writer, "God keep us from
the fury of Mars."
In June evil
passions were to stir men's hearts, anger, hatred, and strife; for in that
month were no less than six quartile aspects of the planets, one to
another.
Many propitious
days are also mentioned, and in conclusion all days are declared to be
favorable to a good man.
"A New
Almanacke and Prognostication for the Yeare of our Lord God 1569" (London)
says that surgical operations must be performed only when "the Moone or
Lorde of the firste house" is in the zodiacal sign governing the
particular member or organ which is to be operated upon.
And in an
English almanac for the year 1571 we find the following passage:--
No part of
man's body ought to be touched with the Chirurgicall instruments, or
cauterie actuall or potencial, when the Sunne or Moone, or the Lord of the
Ascendent, is in the same signe that ruleth that part of man's body.
Also Gemini,
Leo, the last halfe of Libra, and the first 12 degrees of Scorpio: with
Taurus, Virgo, and Capricorne, are not good for the letting of bloud. Two
days before the change of the Moone, and a day after, is yll to let bloud.
. . .
If the same be
for the Pestilence, the Phrensie, the Pluresie, the Squincie, or for a
Continuall headach, proceeding of choler or bloud; or for any burning
Ague, or extreme paine of partes, a man may not so carefully stay for a
chosen day by the Almanack: for that in the meane tyme the pacient perhaps
may dye. For which cause let the skilfull Chirurgeon open a veine, unless
he finde the pacient verie weake, or that the Moone be in the Same Syne
that governeth that part of man's body.
The persistence
of similar beliefs is shown by the following extract from "A Briefe
Prognosticon or rather Diagnosticon for this Year of Grace (1615), by John
Keene, London:--
Seeing that
these inferiour and sublunary mixt bodies are governed of the superiour
and simple bodies, and especially by the motion of our neighbour Planet,
the Moone, diseases vary and differ, and not for that she exceedes the
rest in vertue and power, but because she is neerer us and swifter in
motion; for wee see, the Moone increasing, humours increase; and when she
decreaseth, humours decrease: for the bones in the full of the Moone are
full of marrow, all living creatures both on sea and land, are then
augmented in humiditie, as the Crab, Lobster, Oyster, etc. Also humours in
man's bodie and in Plants are then increased: for when the Sunne and Moone
are in hot signes, heate is increased, in cold signes, cold execedes
heate; therefore have we just cause in purging of humours to consider the
motion of the Moone throagh every signe of the Zodiacke, not only in
purging of humours, but also in curing diseases and in strengthening the
faculties and vertues.
In the
"Dialogue of Dives and Pauper," printed by Richard Pynson in 1493, this
subject is referred to as follows:--
Alle that take
hede to dysmal dayes, or use nyce observances in the newe moone, or in the
newe yeere, as setting of mete or drynke by night on the benche to fede
alholde (or gobelyn).
The French
traveler, Jean Chardin (1643-1713), stated that in the year 1668 Cossacks
invaded the northern provinces of Persia; and when the inhabitants
appealed to the Persian government for aid, they received only the reply
that no assistance could be sent them until the moon had passed out of the
sign of the Scorpion. The Persians formerly divided all the days of the
year into three classes,--preferable or lucky, middling or indifferent,
and unlucky or detested ones; and the Emperor Frederick the Great of
Prussia (1712-86) was governed in his military operations by the advice of
astrologers, and always waited until they had indicated the fortunate
moment for a start.
The "English
Apollo, by Richard Saunders, student in the divine, laudable, and
celestial sciences, London, 1656," in giving advice to mariners, says that
the good or bad position of the planets at the time of sailing has much
influence over the fortunes of a voyage. The ancient sages, moreover,
declared that the chief means of averting evil were, first, the devout
invocation of Providence; and, secondly, the careful choice of a proper
time for sailing by observation of the rules of astrology.
In William
Jones's "Credulities Past and Present" (1525), St. Augustine is quoted as
follows:--
No man shall
observe by the days on what day he travel, or on what he return; because
God created all the seven days which run in the week to the end of this
world. But whithersoever he desires to go, let him sing, and say his
Paternoster, if he know it, and call upon his Lord, and bless himself, and
travel free from care, under the protection of God, without the sorceries
of the Devil.
IV. PREVALENCE OF SIMILAR BELIEFS
IN MODERN TIMES
Among the
Chinese of to-day, as with the inbabitants of ancient Babylon, the days
which are deemed favorable or otherwise for business transactions, farming
operations, or for traveling are still determined by astrologers, and are
indicated in an official almanac published annually at Pekin by the
Imperial Board of Astronomers. The various tribes of the island of
Madagascar also are exceedingly superstitious in regard to the luck or
ill-luck attending certain days, and the lives of children born at an
unlucky time are sometimes sacrificed to save them from anticipated
misfortune.
Natives of the
Gold Coast of West Africa, in their divisions of the year, observe a long
time "consisting of nineteen lucky days, and a short time" of seven
equally propitious days. The seven days intervening between these two
periods are considered unlucky, and during this time they undertake no
voyages nor warlike enterprises. Somewhat similar ideas prevail in Java
and Sumatra, and in many of the smaller islands of the Malay Archipelago.
The Cossacks of western Siberia, the natives of the Baltic provinces of
the Russian Empire, and the Laplanders of the far North, all adapt their
lives to the black and white days of their calendar. The peasantry of West
Sussex in England will not permit their children to go blackberrying on
the tenth day of October, on account of a belief that the Devil goes
afield on that day, and bad luck would surely befall any one rash enough
to eat fruit gathered under such circumstances. The same people believe
that all cats born in the month of May are hypochondriacs, and have an
unpleasant habit of bringing snakes and vipers into the house.
Among the
Moslems of India there are in each month seven evil days, on which no
enterprise is to be undertaken on any consideration. Some of the peculiar
superstitions of these people with regard to traveling on the different
week-days are shown in "Zanoon-E-Islam, or the Customs of the Mussulmans
of India," by Jaffur Shurreef. Thus, if any one proposes journeying on
Saturday, he should eat fish before starting, in order that his plan may
be successfully accomplished, but on Sunday betel-leaf is preferable for
this purpose. In like manner, on Monday he should look into a mirror in
order to obtain wealth. On Tuesday he should eat coriander-seed, and on
Wednesday should partake of curdled milk before starting. On Thursday, if
he eat raw sugar he may confidently anticipate returning with plenty of
merchandise; and on Friday, if he eat dressed meat, he will bring back
pearls and jewels galore.
Some idea of
the beliefs current in the mother country during the last century may be
obtained by a study of the advertisements of astrologers and medical
charlatans in the public press of that period. For example, in the year
1773 one Sylvester Partridge, proprietor and vendor of antidotes, elixirs,
washes for freckles, plumpers for rounding the cheeks, glass eyes, calves
and noses, ivory jaws, and a new receipt for changing the color of the
hair, offered for a consideration to furnish advice as to the proper times
and seasons for letting blood, and to indicate the most favorable aspect
of the moon for drawing teeth and cutting corns. He proffered counsel,
moreover, as to the avoidance of unlucky days for paring the nails, and
the kindest zodiacal sign for grafting, inoculation, and opening of
bee-hives.
In enlightened
England there are still to be found many people who believe that the
relative positions of the sun, moon, and planets are prime factors in
determining the proper times and seasons for undertaking terrestrial
enterprises. Zadkiel's Almanac for 1898 states that natural astrology is
making good progress towards becoming once more a recognized science. To
quote from the preface of this publication:--
As the whole
body of the ocean is not able to keep down one single particle of free
air, which must assuredly force its way to the surface to unite with the
atmosphere, so cannot the combined forces of the prejudice and studied
contempt of all the soi-disant "really scientific men" of the end of the
century prevent the truth of astrologia sana from soaring above their
futile efforts to crush it down, to join the great atmosphere of natural
science, to enlighten the human mind in its onward course and effort,--"to
soar through Nature up to Nature's God."
One example may
suffice to exhibit the character of the predictions given in this same
work. Under the caption, "Voice of the Stars," August, 1898, the writer
says that the stationary positions of Saturn and Uranus are likely to
shake Spain (and perhaps Tuscany) physicilly and politically about the
10th or 11th insts. There will be strained diplomatic relations between
the United States and Spain; for Mars in the sign Gemini, and Saturn in
Sagittarius, must create friction and disturbance, in both countries.
The Jewish
current beliefs in the influence of certain days and seasons appear to
have been mostly derived from the Romans of old. Even nowadays among the
Jews no marriages are solemnized during the interval of fifty days between
the Feast of the Passover and Pentecost; and formerly the favorite wedding
days were those of the new or full moon. In Siam the eighth and fifteenth
days of the moon are observed as sacred, and devoted to worship and rest
from ordinary labor. Sportsmen are forbidden to hunt or fish on these
days. The Siamese astrologers indicate the probable character of any year
by associating it with some animal, upon whose back the New Year is
represented as being mounted.
V. THE SIXTH DAY OF THE WEEK
Let us now
consider the subject of Friday as an alleged dies mala. The seven
week-days were originally named after Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, the Sun,
Mercury, Venus, and the Moon, in the order given, and these names are
found in the early Christian calendars. The Teutonic nations, however,
adopted corresponding names in the Northern mythology,--the Sun and Moon,
Tyr, the Norse God of War, Wodan, Thor, Freyja, and Saturn; and our early
Saxon ancestors worshiped images representing all these deities until
Christianity supplanted paganism in Britain. It has been suggested that
our Friday may have been named after Frigga, the wife of Odin and the
principal goddess of the ancient Scandinavians. But it is much more
probable that the day derives its name from Freyja, the Goddess of Love, a
deity corresponding to the Roman Venus and the Grecian Aphrodite. Freyja,
the most easily propitiated of the goddesses, was wont to listen favorably
to all who invoked her aid, and was especially tender-hearted to
disconsolate lovers. She dwelt in a magnificent palace, and journeyed
about in a car drawn by two cats.
It has been
hinted that Freyja's character was not irreproachable, and that thence
arose Friday's ill-repute, but such an hypothesis is wholly untenable.
From the prose
"Edda" we learn that this goddess was the wife of one Odur, and had a
daughter named Hnossa, who was wonderfully beautiful. Sad to relate,
Freyja was abandoned by her husband, who went away to visit foreign lands,
and she has since spent much time in weeping, her tears being turned into
drops of pure gold.
The fish was an
emblem of Freyja, and as such was offered by the Scandinavians to their
goddess on the sixth day of the week. The fish was also held sacred b the
Babylonians and Assyrians, and by the ancient Romans as a symbol of Venus.
The generally
accepted theory is that the crucifixion of our Lord on Good Friday was the
origin of the widespread superstitions regarding the sixth day of the
week. It is highly probable, however, that these beliefs originated at a
much earlier epoch; for similar ideas are current among the inhabitants of
heathen countries, as in Hindostan, for example. According to an ancient
monkish legend, Adam and Eve partook of the forbidden fruit on a Friday;
and in the Middle Ages many inauspicious occurrences of history or
tradition were thought to have happened on that day.
In a French
manuscript of the year 1285, preserved in the Bibliotheque Nationale in
Paris, entitled "Recommandation du Vendredi, the following events are
alleged to have occurred on a Friday: Adam's creation his sin and
expulsion from Eden, the murder of Abel, Christ's crucifixion, the stoning
of Stephen, the massacre of the Innocents by Herod, the crucifixion of
Peter, the beheading of Paul and that of John the Baptist, and the flight
of the children of Israel through the Red Sea; also the Deluge,, the
Confusion of Tongues at the Tower of Babel, and the infliction of the
Plagues upon the land of Egypt.
The following
extract from a translation of a Saxon manuscript of about the year 1120
may serve to illustrate the credulity of that epoch in England, and the
odium attaching to Friday:
Whoever is born
on Sunday or its night, shall live without anxiety and be handsome. If he
is born on Monday or its night, he shall be killed of men, be he laic or
be he cleric. If on Tuesday or its night, he shall be corrupt in his life,
and sinful and perverse. If he be born on Wednesday or its night, he shall
be very peaceable and easy and shall grow up well and be a lover of good.
. . . If he be born on Friday or its night, he shall be accursed of men,
silly and crafty and loathsome to all men and shall ever be thinking evil
in his heart, and shall be a thief and a great coward, and shall not live
longer than to mid-age. If he is born on Saturday or its night, his deeds
shall be renowned, he shall be an alderman, whether he be man or woman;
many things shall happen unto him, and he shall live long.
Although the
superstitions of the dark ages may seem to us so childish, it may yet be
affirmed with reason that, in proportion to the enlightenment of the
times, the beliefs then current regarding day-fatality were no more absurd
than those of our own era. In the "Reliques of Ancient English Poetry," by
Thomas Percy, D. D., is to be found the following "excellent way to get a
fayrie:"--
First, get a
broad square christall or Venice glasse, in length and breadth three
inches. Then lay that glasse or christall in the blood of a white hen,
three Wednesdayes or three Fridayes. Then take it out and wash it with
holy aq; and fumigate it. Then take three hazle sticks or wands of an
yeare groth; pill them fayre and white; and make them so longe as you
write the spiritt's name, or fayrie's name, which you call three times on
every stick being made flatt on one side. Then bury them under some hill,
whereat you suppose fayries haunt, the Wednesday before you call her; and
the Fridaye followinge take them uppe and at eight, or three or ten of the
clocke which be good planetts and houres for that turne: but when you call
be in cleane life and turn thy face towards the east, and when you have
her bind her in that stone and glasse.
Whiston, the
translator of Josephus, publicly proclaimed in London that the comet of
1712 would be visible on October 14 of that year, and that on the Friday
morning ensuing the world would be destroyed by fire. In the resulting
panic, many people embarked in boats on the Thames, believing the water to
be the safer element, on that particular Friday at least.
Mr. Charles
Godfrey Leland, in his "Etruscan Roman Remains," says that in certain
mediaeval manuscripts the Goddess Venus was represented as the Queen of
Hearts and a dealer of lucky cards. Therefore Friday, the Dies Veneris,
was sometimes considered a lucky day, especially for matrimony. This
opinion finds favor in Glasgow, where a large proportion of marriages take
place on this day; whereas, in the midland counties of England, less than
two per cent of the weddings occur on the sixth day of the week.
References to
the popular sentiment regarding Friday are frequent in the works of
English writers. Sir Thomas Overbury, in his description of "a faire and
happy Milk-mayd," says: "Her dreams are so chaste that shee dare tell
them; only a Fridaie's dream is all her superstition: that she coneeales
for feare of anger." Again, in the play of "Sir John Oldcastle" is this
passage: "Friday, quotha, a dismal day, Candlemas Day this year was
Friday." And in Scott's "Marmion" is the following:--
The Highlander, whose red claymore
The battle turned on Maldas' shore,
Will on a Friday morn look pale
If asked to tell a fairy tale.
He fears the vengeful Elfin King,
Who leaves that day his grassy ring;
Invisible to human ken,
He walks among the sons of men.
As a refreshing
instance of independence of thought in a credulous age, we may quote from
a letter written by Sir Winston Churchill, father of the Duke of
Marlborough, and printed in a tract of 1687. The letter, though
ungrammatical is given verbatim:--
I have made
great experience of the truth of it, and have set down Friday as my own
lucky day, the day on which I was born, christened, married, and which, I
believe, will be the day of my death. The day on which I have had sundry
deliverances from perils by sea and land, perils by false bretbren, perils
of law-suits, etc. I was knighted (by chance unexpected of myself) on the
same day and have several good accidents happened to me on that day; and
am so superstitious in the belief of its good omen, that I choose to begin
any considerable action that concerns me, on the same day. |