SECTION VII
[Some communications respecting the
Neo-Platonic philosophy followed. A spirit with whose features I was
familiar had been photographed, and his dress was something I was unused
to. I inquired, and was told that the conditions under which the partial
materialisation necessary for photography are possible differ from those
in which the spirit presents himself to clairvoyant vision.
The account of the special phase of the
Neo-Platonic teaching was most minute and entirely
new to me. Souffism, the ecstatic meditation that endeavours by
transport to throw off all that is not God, and to attain truth by
transfusion into the Divine, was expounded at length, and
illustrated in the person of one of its professors. I
thus learned much that I have since been
able to trace in operation, and
especially in the teachings of the spirit in question, albeit toned down
and modified by experience.
After this there was a short cessation;
and another evidence of imposture at a circle which I attended caused me
much questioning. I was urged to refrain from attending any circles at
all so long as our own was held; and it was explained that it was of
greatest importance to avoid coming into contact with mediums, or strong
magnetic influence of any kind. I should act as a disturbing element in
other circles, and bring away disturbing influences to our own.
Some remarkable extracts from old poems,
chiefly of Lydgate’s, were now written by a spirit who seemed to delight
in such work, who did nothing else, and who used a very marked
handwriting.
Afterwards, at a séance held
June 13th, 1873, many questions were put on
points of theology, and
a long trance-address was delivered, which was partially
taken down at the time, but many
points were necessarily omitted, or
imperfectly recorded. On the following day, without questioning it was
written by the same communicating spirit who had spoken on the previous
evening:—]
There was much in what was said last night that was imperfectly said, and
hurriedly, and that was not accurately perserved in the record which was
taken at the time. It is of the last importance that, on a subject so
momentous, we should speak with care, and that you should understand
exactly what we wish to convey. We therefore wish to state more clearly
what was said imperfectly to the circle. The conditions of control do
not always enable us to be so precise in speech as we are studious to be
when communicating thus with you. Perfect
isolation commands conditions suitable for precision and accuracy.
We are dealing with the Devine mission which we have in charge. Of the
many difficulties which
beset our path
this is one of the most considerable,
that those who are most congenial to our purpose,
and whose co-operation we most desire, are usually so hampered by
preconceived theological notions, or are so fearful of what seems to
contradict some things which they have learned, that we are unable to
influence them, and grieve sorrowfully to find that which is derived
from God charged on the adversaries, and boldly attributed to an
all-powerful and malignant Devil.
Of all classes of our opponents these are to us the most sad. The
pseudo-scientific man, who will look at nothing save through his own
medium, and on his own terms—who will deal with us only so that he may
be
allowed to prescribe means of demonstrating us to be deluders, liars,
figments of a disordered
brain—he is of little moment to us. His blinded eye cannot see, and his
cloudy intelligence, befogged and cramped with lifelong
prejudice, can be of little service to us. He can at best penetrate but
little into the mysteries
of communion with the spheres; and the foundation of knowledge that he
could acquire, though useful, and valuable even, would be of
SECTION VII
little service to us in our special work. We deal with other issues than
those which would principally engage the attention of those few men of
science who design to notice the phenomenal aspect of our work. The mind
long trained in observation of the phenomena of physics is best devoted
to the elucidation of those facts which come within its province. Our
sphere is different, connected rather with the influence of spirit upon
spirit and the
knowledge of spirit-destiny that we can impart.
And the ignorant and uncultured mind which knows not of what we would
tell, and cannot know until a long course of preliminary training has
prepared the way—this class of mind, though hereafter it may attain to a
plane
of knowledge on which we can work, is of no service now.
To the proud, the arrogant, the wise in their own conceits, the children
of routine and respectability,
we can say very little. The more physical evidence
is necessary to reach them. The story which we are charged with would be
but an idle tale to them.
Is it to the receptive souls who know of God and heavan, and love and
charity, and who desire to know of the hereafter and of the haven to
which they tend, that we turn with earnest longing. But, alas! too often
we find the natural religious instincts, which are God-implanted and
spirit-nurtured, choked or distorted by the cramping
influence of a human theology, the
imperceptible growth of long ages of ignorance and folly.
They are armed at all points against the truth. Do we speak of a
revelation of the Great Father?—they already have a revelation which
they have decided to be complete. Do we tell them of its
inconsistencies, and point out that nowhere pretends to
the finality and infallibility which they would assign it?—they reply to
us with
stray words from the formularies of a Church, or by an opinion borrowed
and adapted from some person whom they have chosen to consider
infallibly
inspired. They apply to us a test drawn from some one of the sacred
records which was given
at
a special time for a
special purpose, and which they imagine to be of universal applications.
Do we point to our credentials, and to the miracles, so called, which
attest the reality of our
mission, even as the attested the mission of those
whom we influenced of old? —they tell us that the age of miracles is
past, and that
only the inspired of the Holy Ghost long centuries ago were permitted to
work such wonders
as evidence of Divine
teaching. They tell us that the Devil,
whom they have imagined for themselves, has the power
to
counterfeit God’s work, and they consign us and our mission to darkness
and outer antagonism to God and goodness. They would be
willing to help us; for, indeed,
we say that which is probable, but that we are of the Devil.
We
must be, because in
the Bible it is said that false and deceiving spirits will come; and so
we must be the deceivers.
It must be so, for did not a holy and elevated
Teacher prophesy of those who should deny the Son of God? And do not we
practically remove Him and His work from the place in which God has
placed it and Him? It must be so; for do we not place human reason above
faith? Do we not preach and teach a seductive Gospel of good works, and
give credit to the doer of them? And is not all this the work of the
arch-fiend transformed into an angel of light, and striving to win souls
to ruin?
It is such arguments, honestly put forward by those whose respect we fain
would win, that are to us a bitter sorrow. They are in many cases
loving, earnest souls, who need but the progressive tendency to make
them bright lights in the world’s gloom. To them we fain would give our
message; but before we can build on the sure foundations which they
already have of knowledge of God and duty, we must perforce clear away
the rubbish which renders further elevation unsafe.
Religion, to be worthy the name, must have it two sides—the one pointing
to God,, the other
to man. What has the received faith, which is called
orthodox by its professors, to say on these points; and wherein do we
differ in
our message; and how far is such difference on our part in accord with
reason? For, at the very
outset, we claim, as the only court to which we can as yet
appeal, the Reason which is implanted in man. We claim it; for it was by
Reason that the sages settled the list of the writings which they
decided to be the exclusive and final revelation of God. To Reason they
appealed for their decision. To Reason we appeal too. Or do our friends
claim that Divine
SECTION VII
guidance prescribed for them what should be for all time the body of
revealed truth? We, too, are the messengers of the Most High, no less
surely sent than the spirits who guided the Hebrew seers, and who
ministered to those whose fiat settled the Divine word.
We are as they: our message as their message, only more advanced; our God
their God, only more clearly revealed, less human, more Divine. Whether
the appeal be to Divine inspiration or not, human Reason (guided doubtless
by spirit agency, but still Reason) sways the final decision. And those
who reject this appeal are out of their own mouths convicted of folly.
Blind faith can be no substitute for reasoning trust. For the faith is
faith that either has grounds for its trust or not. In the former case the
ground is reasonable; in which case Reason again is
the ultimate judge; or it is not, in which case it
would commend itself to none. But if faith
rest on no ground at all,
we
need not further labour to show it baseless and untrustworthy.
To Reason, then, we turn. How far are we
proved reasonably to be of the Devil? How far is our creed an evil
one? In what respect are we chargeable with diabolic tendency? These are
points on which
we
will instruct you.
|